Deriving volume density profiles of filaments from observed surface densities
- 1Université Paris-Saclay, Université Paris Cité, CEA, CNRS, AIM
- 2National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Abstract
An accurate characterization of filamentary structures in star-forming clouds is essential for understanding star formation. Traditional methods fit observed surface density profiles Σ(r) with slope γ and width H using the Plummer function, assuming β = γ + 1 and h ≈ H for the volume density slope and width. These assumptions break down for shallow profiles, with the slope and width relations deviating progressively more for compact and extended filaments, respectively. We present a new fitting method that explicitly accounts for finite cylindrical geometry and establishes self-consistent empirical relationships between the parameters of Σ(r) and those of the volume density profile ρ(r), characterized by slope β and width h. The method was validated on model profiles and applied to selected filaments in the California molecular cloud. The slope difference, δ ≡ β − γ, falls below unity for shallow (β ≲ 2) and compact profiles. Moreover, h and H can differ by over an order of magnitude for extended filaments with shallow slopes. Accurate parameter recovery requires high resolvedness ℛ ≡ H/O ≳ 10 (where O is the beam width). At lower resolvedness, slopes are severely overestimated and filaments remain unresolved even when H ≫ O. The traditional Plummer function yields systematically overestimated slopes. Accurate deconvolution requires a priori knowledge of the true parameters, creating a fundamental circular problem whose only robust solution is obtaining sufficiently high angular resolution. Current far-infrared observations typically lack sufficient resolution, and some previously reported filament properties may require reinterpretation.
Related
- Living near filaments: How environment shapes age profiles in low-mass galaxies
- Linear gas mass density: a unifying descriptor of Cosmic Filaments
- Multilobed Stokes V Profiles of the Fe i 407.17 nm Line Observed by Sunrise iii
- Can third- and fourth-order multipoles plus radial variation of iso-density ellipses explain the observed flux ratios in B1422+231? YES, and a lesson learned from a TNG100 lensing galaxy sample
- A unified stochastic random walk theory for Kolmogorov spectrum, halo mass functions, and halo density profiles
BibTeX
@article{alexander2026deriving,
title = {{Deriving volume density profiles of filaments from observed surface densities}},
author = {Men’shchikov Alexander and Zhang Guo-Yin},
journal = {Astronomy \& Astrophysics},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/202659066},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202659066},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Deriving volume density profiles of filaments from observed surface densities
AU - Men’shchikov Alexander
AU - Zhang Guo-Yin
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/24
JO - Astronomy & Astrophysics
DO - 10.1051/0004-6361/202659066
UR - https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202659066
AB - An accurate characterization of filamentary structures in star-forming clouds is essential for understanding star formation. Traditional methods fit observed surface density profiles Σ(r) with slope γ and width H using the Plummer function, assuming β = γ + 1 and h ≈ H for the volume density slope and width. These assumptions break down for shallow profiles, with the slope and width relations deviating progressively more for compact and extended filaments, respectively. We present a new fitting method that explicitly accounts for finite cylindrical geometry and establishes self-consistent empirical relationships between the parameters of Σ(r) and those of the volume density profile ρ(r), characterized by slope β and width h. The method was validated on model profiles and applied to selected filaments in the California molecular cloud. The slope difference, δ ≡ β − γ, falls below unity for shallow (β ≲ 2) and compact profiles. Moreover, h and H can differ by over an order of magnitude for extended filaments with shallow slopes. Accurate parameter recovery requires high resolvedness ℛ ≡ H/O ≳ 10 (where O is the beam width). At lower resolvedness, slopes are severely overestimated and filaments remain unresolved even when H ≫ O. The traditional Plummer function yields systematically overestimated slopes. Accurate deconvolution requires a priori knowledge of the true parameters, creating a fundamental circular problem whose only robust solution is obtaining sufficiently high angular resolution. Current far-infrared observations typically lack sufficient resolution, and some previously reported filament properties may require reinterpretation.
SN - 0004-6361
SN - 1432-0746
ER -