Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
186,541 studies31 sourcesUpdated 2 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics

Thermotherapy for prevention of perineal pain after vaginal birth: Evaluation of warm compresses and cold packs using a factorial randomized controlled trial

Abstract

Objective: Perineal pain is common after vaginal birth and might affect maternal well-being and mother-infant bonding. We aimed to evaluate the impact of heat or cooling therapy at delivery on postpartum perineal pain. Methods: This pilot open-label, multicenter 2 × 2 factorial randomized controlled trial included all women without history of vaginal birth, randomly (1:1) assigned to receive heat therapy (HT, warm compresses) or standard care (SC) during pushing, and cooling therapy (CT, cold pack) or SC during immediate postpartum. The primary outcome was the mean of repeated measures of perineal pain intensity (0-10 scale) during the first 24 h. Secondary outcomes included perineal healing, additional analgesic use, childbirth experience, and perineal injuries. Analyses were conducted on a complete-case intention-to-treat basis. Results: From May 2022 to December 2023, 115 women were enrolled and 105 randomized (early termination at 50% of the planned inclusions). Pain intensity was not statistically different between groups: HT versus SC (4.0 ± 2.5 vs. 3.6 ± 2.2, mean difference [95% CI] = 0.43 [-0.56, 1.41]; P = 0.39); CT versus SC (4.3 ± 2.5 vs. 3.4 ± 2.2, mean difference = 0.93 [-0.04, 1.91]; P = 0.06). No statistically significant interaction was observed. HT was not associated with any difference in terms of perineal tear (respectively, with and without HT, for first, second, and third degree tear: 49.0 vs. 54.9%, 37.3 vs. 31.4%, and 5.9 vs. 5.9%; P = 0.94). Conclusion: No clear evidence of benefit of heat or cooling therapy for preventing postpartum perineal pain was observed. These non-pharmaceutical methods were generally well accepted by the women and were easy for midwives to implement. Further studies are needed to explore optimal timing, modalities, and target populations. Clinical trial registration: The PERISAFE protocol was registered in the ClinicalTrial database (2021-03-03, No.NCT04778631). The first participant was recruited in May 2022 (2022-05-16).

Related

  1. Perioperative intravenous lidocaine for the prevention of chronic postsurgical pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Wei-Jing Zhu, Ran An, Qian-Yun Pang +1
    Frontiers in medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Comparative Efficacy of Vancomycin and Fidaxomicin Regimens for the Prevention of Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    C. Prosty, G. Butler-Laporte, J. Brophy +18
    medRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textInfectious diseasemedRxiv
  3. Transcutaneous low-level vagus nerve stimulation for the prevention of postoperative atrial fibrillation after cardiac valve surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Lindi Bian, Yuwei Shi, Tieshuai Liu +3
    BMC complementary medicine and therapiesPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textNeurologyEurope PMC
  4. Perioperative transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting after gynecologic laparoscopic surgery: protocol for a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial
    R. Wang, H. Yang, H. Li +5
    medRxivPreprintCC BYFull textSurgery & anaesthesiamedRxiv
  5. USB-powered vs. self-heating warm compresses for meibomian gland dysfunction: A prospective randomized crossover clinical trial
    Ali M. Al Saqr, Moath Faisal Alharbi, Meshary Alrumizan +1
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textClinical trials & evidence synthesisPhysiologyPLOS
BibTeX
@article{blancpetitjean2026thermotherapy,
  title = {{Thermotherapy for prevention of perineal pain after vaginal birth: Evaluation of warm compresses and cold packs using a factorial randomized controlled trial}},
  author = {Pauline Blanc-Petitjean and Clara Rollet and Géraldine Meunier and Laurent Mandelbrot and Camille Le Ray and Anne Alice Chantry},
  journal = {International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics},
  year = {2026},
  month = aug,
  doi = {10.1002/ijgo.71243},
  url = {https://hal.science/hal-05748768v1},
  note = {CC BY-NC 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Thermotherapy for prevention of perineal pain after vaginal birth: Evaluation of warm compresses and cold packs using a factorial randomized controlled trial
AU  - Pauline Blanc-Petitjean
AU  - Clara Rollet
AU  - Géraldine Meunier
AU  - Laurent Mandelbrot
AU  - Camille Le Ray
AU  - Anne Alice Chantry
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/08/03
JO  - International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics
DO  - 10.1002/ijgo.71243
UR  - https://hal.science/hal-05748768v1
AB  - Objective: Perineal pain is common after vaginal birth and might affect maternal well-being and mother-infant bonding. We aimed to evaluate the impact of heat or cooling therapy at delivery on postpartum perineal pain. Methods: This pilot open-label, multicenter 2 × 2 factorial randomized controlled trial included all women without history of vaginal birth, randomly (1:1) assigned to receive heat therapy (HT, warm compresses) or standard care (SC) during pushing, and cooling therapy (CT, cold pack) or SC during immediate postpartum. The primary outcome was the mean of repeated measures of perineal pain intensity (0-10 scale) during the first 24 h. Secondary outcomes included perineal healing, additional analgesic use, childbirth experience, and perineal injuries. Analyses were conducted on a complete-case intention-to-treat basis. Results: From May 2022 to December 2023, 115 women were enrolled and 105 randomized (early termination at 50% of the planned inclusions). Pain intensity was not statistically different between groups: HT versus SC (4.0 ± 2.5 vs. 3.6 ± 2.2, mean difference [95% CI] = 0.43 [-0.56, 1.41]; P = 0.39); CT versus SC (4.3 ± 2.5 vs. 3.4 ± 2.2, mean difference = 0.93 [-0.04, 1.91]; P = 0.06). No statistically significant interaction was observed. HT was not associated with any difference in terms of perineal tear (respectively, with and without HT, for first, second, and third degree tear: 49.0 vs. 54.9%, 37.3 vs. 31.4%, and 5.9 vs. 5.9%; P = 0.94). Conclusion: No clear evidence of benefit of heat or cooling therapy for preventing postpartum perineal pain was observed. These non-pharmaceutical methods were generally well accepted by the women and were easy for midwives to implement. Further studies are needed to explore optimal timing, modalities, and target populations. Clinical trial registration: The PERISAFE protocol was registered in the ClinicalTrial database (2021-03-03, No.NCT04778631). The first participant was recruited in May 2022 (2022-05-16).
SN  - 0020-7292
ER  -