Evidence landscape for surgical site infection prevention strategies in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review of literature for intervention development as part of the IMPRESS study
12 affiliations
- 1Department of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) Bathinda, Bathinda, Punjab, India
- 2Pharmacology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College and Hospital, Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh, India
- 3Pharmacology, AIIMS Rishikesh, Rishikesh, India
- 4Department of Pharmacology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
- 5Pharmacology, Pt BD Sharma Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, ROHTAK, Haryana, India
- 6Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Kerala University of Health Sciences, Thrissur, India
- 7Pharmacology, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India
- 8Clinical Studies and Trials Unit, Division of Development Research, Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), New Delhi, Delhi, India
- 9Faculty of Medical Research, Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India
- 10Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden, Europe
- 11Clinical Studies and Trials Unit, Division of Development Research, Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), New Delhi, India
- 12Faculty of Medical Research, Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), Ghaziabad, India
Abstract
Objectives: Surgical site infections (SSIs) contribute to about 20% of hospital-acquired infections, with an 8–30% incidence in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Hospitals in LMIC settings face limited resources, overcrowding, staff shortages and poor infection control. Evaluating effective, feasible and evidence-based multipronged interventions implementable in LMICs is crucial to guide sustainable SSI prevention strategies and improve outcomes. This scoping review addressed the question: “Which SSI prevention interventions have been evaluated in LMICs?”
Design: The review was reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR).
Data sources: The comprehensive literature search was conducted using three databases: PubMed (National Library of Medicine), Scopus (Elsevier) and Embase (Ovid) during August–September 2024.
Eligibility criteria: Peer-reviewed interventional studies evaluating one or more SSI prevention interventions or intervention bundles were included.
Data extraction and synthesis: Title and abstract screening was performed by two independent reviewers in Rayaan according to pre-defined inclusion–exclusion criteria, followed by full-text screening from January to March 2025. Data were extracted from the included studies using a standardised Excel sheet, including absolute reductions in SSI rates.
Results: Of the 8368 studies identified, 5577 remained after de-duplication and underwent title and abstract screening, 245 full-text articles were assessed for full-text review and 186 studies were included in the review. Among the included studies, 101/186 (54.3%) were published between 2020 and 2024, 144/186 (77.4%) were randomised controlled trials and 88 (47.3%) were conducted in India. Overall, 64 SSI prevention interventions were identified, including 13 pre-operative (20.3%), 35 intra-operative (54.7%) and 16 post-operative (25.0%) interventions. The most frequently evaluated interventions were single-dose surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) for clean/clean-contaminated surgery (32 studies, 17.2%), post-operative restriction of SAP to <24 hours (22, 11.8%), appropriate antibiotic selection (13, 7%) and timing of SAP within 60 min of surgical incision (12, 6.5%), chlorhexidine skin preparation (11, 5.9%) and WHO Surgical Safety Checklist implementation (10, 5.4%). Across the studies, the most consistent reduction in SSI was observed with guideline-concordant perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis, alcohol-based chlorhexidine skin preparation, surgeon hand preparation, limiting operating theatre traffic, negative pressure wound therapy, early postoperative bathing, sterile wound care, patient education and SSI surveillance.
Conclusions: The review suggests that the evidence from LMICs supports optimisation of perioperative antimicrobial therapy alongside implementation of simple, evidence-based infection prevention practices rather than reliance on prolonged post-operative antibiotic use. Developing context-specific SAP policies and strengthening SSI surveillance and staff education are essential for sustainable improvement. There remains a critical need to design and implement multipronged interventions that are scalable and feasible in LMIC settings.
Related
- Development and content validation of a risk-stratified nursing intervention programme for the prevention of healthcare-associated infections
- Study protocol for the development of reporting guidelines for intervention adaptation studies: Transparent Reporting of Adaptations, Context and Effects (TRACE) – a multimethod approach using literature review, Delphi, crowdsourcing, webinar and usability testing
- A Family-Inclusive, Visually Supported Sexual Abuse Prevention Intervention for Children with Moderate Intellectual Disabilities
- Emerging information technologies across the autism service and prevention continuum: a narrative review of screening, diagnosis, intervention, and health equity
- Improving the implementation of an adolescent obesity prevention intervention in under-resourced schools
BibTeX
@article{rohilla2026evidence,
title = {{Evidence landscape for surgical site infection prevention strategies in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review of literature for intervention development as part of the IMPRESS study}},
author = {Rachna Rohilla and Muskan Gupta and Syed Shariq Naeem and Mayank Gupta and Ashish Kakkar and Niti Mittal and Thekkumkara Surendran Anish and Sandeep Kaushal and Jerin Jose Cherian and Sowparnika Treasa Sabu and Aparna Mukherjee},
journal = {BMJ Open},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1136/bmjopen-2026-117116},
url = {https://bmjopen.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-117116},
note = {CC BY-NC 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Evidence landscape for surgical site infection prevention strategies in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review of literature for intervention development as part of the IMPRESS study
AU - Rachna Rohilla
AU - Muskan Gupta
AU - Syed Shariq Naeem
AU - Mayank Gupta
AU - Ashish Kakkar
AU - Niti Mittal
AU - Thekkumkara Surendran Anish
AU - Sandeep Kaushal
AU - Jerin Jose Cherian
AU - Sowparnika Treasa Sabu
AU - Aparna Mukherjee
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/27
JO - BMJ Open
DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2026-117116
UR - https://bmjopen.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-117116
AB - Objectives: Surgical site infections (SSIs) contribute to about 20% of hospital-acquired infections, with an 8–30% incidence in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Hospitals in LMIC settings face limited resources, overcrowding, staff shortages and poor infection control. Evaluating effective, feasible and evidence-based multipronged interventions implementable in LMICs is crucial to guide sustainable SSI prevention strategies and improve outcomes. This scoping review addressed the question: “Which SSI prevention interventions have been evaluated in LMICs?” Design: The review was reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Data sources: The comprehensive literature search was conducted using three databases: PubMed (National Library of Medicine), Scopus (Elsevier) and Embase (Ovid) during August–September 2024. Eligibility criteria: Peer-reviewed interventional studies evaluating one or more SSI prevention interventions or intervention bundles were included. Data extraction and synthesis: Title and abstract screening was performed by two independent reviewers in Rayaan according to pre-defined inclusion–exclusion criteria, followed by full-text screening from January to March 2025. Data were extracted from the included studies using a standardised Excel sheet, including absolute reductions in SSI rates. Results: Of the 8368 studies identified, 5577 remained after de-duplication and underwent title and abstract screening, 245 full-text articles were assessed for full-text review and 186 studies were included in the review. Among the included studies, 101/186 (54.3%) were published between 2020 and 2024, 144/186 (77.4%) were randomised controlled trials and 88 (47.3%) were conducted in India. Overall, 64 SSI prevention interventions were identified, including 13 pre-operative (20.3%), 35 intra-operative (54.7%) and 16 post-operative (25.0%) interventions. The most frequently evaluated interventions were single-dose surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) for clean/clean-contaminated surgery (32 studies, 17.2%), post-operative restriction of SAP to <24 hours (22, 11.8%), appropriate antibiotic selection (13, 7%) and timing of SAP within 60 min of surgical incision (12, 6.5%), chlorhexidine skin preparation (11, 5.9%) and WHO Surgical Safety Checklist implementation (10, 5.4%). Across the studies, the most consistent reduction in SSI was observed with guideline-concordant perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis, alcohol-based chlorhexidine skin preparation, surgeon hand preparation, limiting operating theatre traffic, negative pressure wound therapy, early postoperative bathing, sterile wound care, patient education and SSI surveillance. Conclusions: The review suggests that the evidence from LMICs supports optimisation of perioperative antimicrobial therapy alongside implementation of simple, evidence-based infection prevention practices rather than reliance on prolonged post-operative antibiotic use. Developing context-specific SAP policies and strengthening SSI surveillance and staff education are essential for sustainable improvement. There remains a critical need to design and implement multipronged interventions that are scalable and feasible in LMIC settings.
SN - 2044-6055
SN - 2044-6055
ER -