Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 45 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NC-NDmedRxiv

Balancing optimization and standardization in multisite fMRI data analyses to address site-specific parameters

  1. 1Heinrich Heine University

Abstract

Multisite functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) studies are rapidly becoming the norm to allow the acquisition of large samples required to perform advanced statistical techniques, e.g. machine learning. However, acquiring data at multiple sites includes methodological and technical challenges due to the difference in the facilities of each site, such as scanner manufacturer and model. These new challenges add to the already well-known challenges of fMRI data, including scanner-related noise, participant movement, and physiological confounds. To ensure the optimal quality of data, a balance needs to be achieved between standardizing data preprocessing across sites and optimizing within-site data preprocessing. To define the optimal preprocessing pipeline including standard steps and additional denoising technique for our multisite dataset, we first tested 3 commonly used preprocessing pipelines, i.e. fMRIPrep, FSL, and CONN. These pipelines all include standard steps, e.g. motion correction, temporal filter, etc. In a second step, to further improve signal quality, we tested the efficiency of 3 additional denoising techniques on the output of the data preprocessed with the previously defined pipeline. These techniques included aCompCor, FSL FIX and ICA-AROMA. Signal quality was quantified as temporal signal-to-noise ratio (tSNR) across and within sites. Our results show that the performance of the preprocessing pipeline and denoising technique varies between sites. FSL yielded the highest tSNR at two sites and fMRIPrep at the third, revealing a significant site x pipeline interaction. An FSL-based pipeline with minimal adjustment to accommodate site-specific parameters and followed by denoising using a single FSL FIX classifier, which was custom-trained across sites, achieved the highest quality of signal in our data and yielded the greatest consistency in improved data quality across sites. Because of the potential of this pipeline to adequately identify and address site-specific noise, while remaining constant across sites, we selected it as optimal preprocessing pipeline for our dataset.

Related

  1. Circadian syndrome and incident multisite pain among middle-aged and older Chinese adults: component-specific and longitudinal analyses from CHARLS
    Qile Deng
    BMC Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0PhysiologyCrossref
  2. Standardization of shotgun metagenomics parameters for pks-positive enterobacteria detection in human fecal samples: Receiver operating characteristic analysis using polymerase chain reaction as reference standard
    Yusei Tataka, Hitoshi Kawashima, Hinako Nanri +5
    BMC MicrobiologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textEndocrinology & metabolismPMC
  3. Standardization of the Monocyte Monolayer Assay: Lessons Learned From Laboratory Optimization and Literature Review.
    Shamee Shastry, Kavya Babu, Deepika Chenna +2
    Journal of clinical laboratory analysisPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Balancing energy efficiency and functional demand via bimodal coupling optimization in biological rhythms
    Jiajun Zhang, Jing Han, Liang-Liang Xie
    Communications BiologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textPhysiologyCrossref
  5. Balancing safety and efficacy in photodynamic therapy for facial port-wine stains in children aged 2-7 years: a prospective controlled study of light-intensity optimization
    Jiawen Qin, Xiaoxi Lin, Yue Han +6
    Journal of Dermatological TreatmentPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineDOAJ
BibTeX
@misc{hoeppli2026balancing,
  title = {{Balancing optimization and standardization in multisite fMRI data analyses to address site-specific parameters}},
  author = {M.-E. Hoeppli and S. Pascual-Diaz and E. E. Biggs and L. E. Simons and R. C. Coghill and M. Lopez-Sola and C. King and N. Aghaeepour and M. Angst and B. L. J. Gaudilliere and J. N. Stinson and M. Moayedi},
  howpublished = {medRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.09.04.26362236},
  url = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.04.26362236v1},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Balancing optimization and standardization in multisite fMRI data analyses to address site-specific parameters
AU  - M.-E. Hoeppli
AU  - S. Pascual-Diaz
AU  - E. E. Biggs
AU  - L. E. Simons
AU  - R. C. Coghill
AU  - M. Lopez-Sola
AU  - C. King
AU  - N. Aghaeepour
AU  - M. Angst
AU  - B. L. J. Gaudilliere
AU  - J. N. Stinson
AU  - M. Moayedi
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/04
PB  - medRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.09.04.26362236
UR  - https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.04.26362236v1
AB  - Multisite functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) studies are rapidly becoming the norm to allow the acquisition of large samples required to perform advanced statistical techniques, e.g. machine learning. However, acquiring data at multiple sites includes methodological and technical challenges due to the difference in the facilities of each site, such as scanner manufacturer and model. These new challenges add to the already well-known challenges of fMRI data, including scanner-related noise, participant movement, and physiological confounds. To ensure the optimal quality of data, a balance needs to be achieved between standardizing data preprocessing across sites and optimizing within-site data preprocessing. To define the optimal preprocessing pipeline including standard steps and additional denoising technique for our multisite dataset, we first tested 3 commonly used preprocessing pipelines, i.e. fMRIPrep, FSL, and CONN. These pipelines all include standard steps, e.g. motion correction, temporal filter, etc. In a second step, to further improve signal quality, we tested the efficiency of 3 additional denoising techniques on the output of the data preprocessed with the previously defined pipeline. These techniques included aCompCor, FSL FIX and ICA-AROMA. Signal quality was quantified as temporal signal-to-noise ratio (tSNR) across and within sites. Our results show that the performance of the preprocessing pipeline and denoising technique varies between sites. FSL yielded the highest tSNR at two sites and fMRIPrep at the third, revealing a significant site x pipeline interaction. An FSL-based pipeline with minimal adjustment to accommodate site-specific parameters and followed by denoising using a single FSL FIX classifier, which was custom-trained across sites, achieved the highest quality of signal in our data and yielded the greatest consistency in improved data quality across sites. Because of the potential of this pipeline to adequately identify and address site-specific noise, while remaining constant across sites, we selected it as optimal preprocessing pipeline for our dataset.
ER  -