Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,761 studies31 sourcesUpdated 7 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

A Counterexample to Two Compactness Conjectures of Brudnyi

Abstract

We construct a quasi-Banach function lattice X on ℝ whose quasi-norm is order continuous and invariant under every translation. Nevertheless, X contains a bounded sequence with common compact support which is equicontinuous in X and has no norm-convergent subsequence. This provides a counterexample to Conjectures 2.5 and 2.11 proposed by Brudnyi in \cite{Brudnyi2015}.

Related

  1. A Counterexample to Three Conjectures of Luo
    Qilong Guo
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGeometry & topologyarXiv
  2. A Counterexample to the Weak Gibbs and Regularity Conjectures
    Marius Wesle
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textMathematical physicsQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  3. Compactness via Consistency Properties
    Edgar Valenzuela
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textLogic & foundationsarXiv
  4. Compactness for almost projective modules
    Filippo Calderoni, Esmé Yanowitz
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textLogic & foundationsarXiv
  5. A remark on the compactness of manifolds with non-negative Ricci curvature and uniformly convex boundary
    Yasuaki Fujitani
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textGeometry & topologyarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{huang2026counterexample,
  title = {{A Counterexample to Two Compactness Conjectures of Brudnyi}},
  author = {Jinghao Huang and Ran Xu},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.11066},
  eprint = {2610.11066},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.11066},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - A Counterexample to Two Compactness Conjectures of Brudnyi
AU  - Jinghao Huang
AU  - Ran Xu
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/08
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.11066
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.11066
AB  - We construct a quasi-Banach function lattice X on ℝ whose quasi-norm is order continuous and invariant under every translation. Nevertheless, X contains a bounded sequence with common compact support which is equicontinuous in X and has no norm-convergent subsequence. This provides a counterexample to Conjectures 2.5 and 2.11 proposed by Brudnyi in \cite{Brudnyi2015}.
ER  -