Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 50 min ago
PreprintCC BYbioRxiv

Testing for Shared Molecular-Evolutionary Signatures of Diurnality and Nocturnality in Mammalian Circadian Clock Genes

  1. 1University of Padua

Abstract

Following an ancestral nocturnal phase, diurnality evolved independently in multiple mammalian lineages after the Cretaceous-Palaeogene boundary. Whether these recurrent temporal-niche transitions drove convergent molecular evolution in the circadian oscillator remains largely untested. We analyzed 18 core clock genes and direct regulators across 60 diurnal and nocturnal mammals, identifying 10 independent gains of diurnality and 5 reversals to nocturnality on a fixed supertree topology. Using six complementary evolutionary frameworks (spanning substitution counts, profile shifts, selective regimes, and evolutionary rates) we tested for shared molecular adaptations. To ensure that our negative findings reflected biological reality rather than methodological insensitivity, we planted 90 synthetic convergent residues into the empirical alignments. While this benchmark demonstrated high power to detect broadly shared convergence (e.g., PCOC recovered 35 of 36 planted sites across ten lineages without false positives), empirical alignments showed no credible signal. Same-residue convergence occurred at expected background levels (0.310 observed vs. 0.337 null), and no gene displayed activity-dependent shifts in selective pressure or evolutionary rate. These results indicate that repeated transitions in mammalian activity patterns were not driven by a common set of detectable amino-acid changes in the core circadian machinery.

Related

  1. Integration of Nascent Transcriptomes and Cross-Species Atlases Reveals Evolutionary Barriers in Transcriptional Kinetics During Mammalian Hibernation.
    Zhuopeng Hu, Shidi Gao, Yilin Wu +3
    Veterinary sciencesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEcologyEurope PMC
  2. Molecular basis for cold and menthol sensing by mammalian TRPM8
    Hyuk-Joon Lee, Cheon-Gyu Park, Justin G. Fedor +3
    Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND7 citedNeuroscienceOpenAlex
  3. Multi-scale haplotype signatures distinguish among evolutionary processes
    Mohammad Khan, Sandipan Paul Arnab, Md Ruhul Amin +2
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textGenetics & genomicsbioRxivPMC
  4. From Genes to Brains: Molecular Evolution and Mammalian Brain Cellular Diversity
    A. Solovyov, M. A. Kazanskii, A. Suraganov +1
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textEvolutionary biologybioRxiv
  5. Early-life bovine respiratory virome analysis reveals phage-driven adaptation and cross-host evolutionary signatures
    Yue Wang, Hanbeen Kim, Nilusha Malmuthuge +7
    Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEcologyCrossrefPMC
BibTeX
@misc{selcukoglu2026testing,
  title = {{Testing for Shared Molecular-Evolutionary Signatures of Diurnality and Nocturnality in Mammalian Circadian Clock Genes}},
  author = {A. K. Selcukoglu and A. K. Koc},
  howpublished = {bioRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.09.17.752369},
  url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.17.752369v1},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Testing for Shared Molecular-Evolutionary Signatures of Diurnality and Nocturnality in Mammalian Circadian Clock Genes
AU  - A. K. Selcukoglu
AU  - A. K. Koc
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/17
PB  - bioRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.09.17.752369
UR  - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.17.752369v1
AB  - Following an ancestral nocturnal phase, diurnality evolved independently in multiple mammalian lineages after the Cretaceous-Palaeogene boundary. Whether these recurrent temporal-niche transitions drove convergent molecular evolution in the circadian oscillator remains largely untested. We analyzed 18 core clock genes and direct regulators across 60 diurnal and nocturnal mammals, identifying 10 independent gains of diurnality and 5 reversals to nocturnality on a fixed supertree topology. Using six complementary evolutionary frameworks (spanning substitution counts, profile shifts, selective regimes, and evolutionary rates) we tested for shared molecular adaptations. To ensure that our negative findings reflected biological reality rather than methodological insensitivity, we planted 90 synthetic convergent residues into the empirical alignments. While this benchmark demonstrated high power to detect broadly shared convergence (e.g., PCOC recovered 35 of 36 planted sites across ten lineages without false positives), empirical alignments showed no credible signal. Same-residue convergence occurred at expected background levels (0.310 observed vs. 0.337 null), and no gene displayed activity-dependent shifts in selective pressure or evolutionary rate. These results indicate that repeated transitions in mammalian activity patterns were not driven by a common set of detectable amino-acid changes in the core circadian machinery.
ER  -