Waiting time for scheduled outpatient specialist consultations by access pathway in public hospitals in Ecuador
- 1School of Dentistry, Universidad Espíritu Santo, Samborondón, Ecuador
- 2Pvalor SAS, Portoviejo, Ecuador
Abstract
Objective: To quantify waiting time in days for scheduled outpatient specialist consultations and to compare waiting time between standardized and non-standardized access pathways in Ecuadorian public hospitals. Methods: We analyzed hospital-based survey data from Ecuadorian public hospitals, restricted to adults attending a scheduled outpatient specialist consultation (n = 4,436). Emergency care, unscheduled urgent visits, procedures, and follow-up visits were excluded by design. Access pathway was classified from participants’ self-report as standardized (institutional or system-based) or non-standardized (informal or non-system-based). Waiting time, defined as the number of days between obtaining the appointment and attending the consultation, was compared using the Mann–Whitney U test. Sociodemographic correlates of non-standardized access were examined using adjusted logistic regression, and adjusted median differences were estimated using quantile regression (τ = 0.50). Effect modification by specialty referral requirement was assessed in a single median regression model using an interaction between access pathway and referral-requirement stratum. Results: Non-standardized access was associated with shorter waiting times than standardized access. In median regression adjusted for sociodemographic covariates, specialty, and hospital, with hospital-clustered inference, non-standardized access was associated with a 3.6-day shorter conditional median waiting time (95% CI −6.2 to −1.0). Adjusted stratum-specific contrasts were −7.9 days (95% CI −13.7 to −2.1) in direct-access specialties and −3.1 days (95% CI −5.9 to −0.2) in referral-required specialties; however, the interaction between access pathway and referral-requirement stratum was not statistically significant (p = 0.136). Conclusion: Among patients who attended a scheduled outpatient specialist consultation in Ecuadorian public hospitals, non-standardized access was associated with shorter waiting times. Although the adjusted point estimate was larger in direct-access specialties, the formal interaction test did not provide clear evidence that the association differed according to specialty referral requirement.
Related
- A Fuzzy Gain-Scheduled Time Base Generator for Fixed-Time Leader-Following Tracking Consensus of Feedforward Nonlinear Multi-Agent Systems
- Gain-Scheduled H∞ Attitude Control of a 6U CubeSat Under Inertia Uncertainty and Actuator Constraints
- Modeling inhomogeneous spatial point configurations with applications to replicated patterns in real-life waiting crowds
- Adjusting for Social Groups in Spatial Point Process Models for Waiting Pedestrian Configurations
- How Much Does Submitting a Burst of Jobs Impact Waiting Time? An Analysis of the Jean Zay Workload Trace
BibTeX
@article{briones2026waiting,
title = {{Waiting time for scheduled outpatient specialist consultations by access pathway in public hospitals in Ecuador}},
author = {Marcelo Armijos Briones and Emilia Diaz Cercado and Oscar Marcillo-Toala and Patricia Estefanía Ayala Aguirre and Pablo Lenin Benitez Sellan and Antonio Lanata-Flores and Nicole Armijos Bazurto},
journal = {PLOS One},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0349550},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0349550},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Waiting time for scheduled outpatient specialist consultations by access pathway in public hospitals in Ecuador
AU - Marcelo Armijos Briones
AU - Emilia Diaz Cercado
AU - Oscar Marcillo-Toala
AU - Patricia Estefanía Ayala Aguirre
AU - Pablo Lenin Benitez Sellan
AU - Antonio Lanata-Flores
AU - Nicole Armijos Bazurto
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/17
JO - PLOS One
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0349550
UR - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0349550
AB - Objective: To quantify waiting time in days for scheduled outpatient specialist consultations and to compare waiting time between standardized and non-standardized access pathways in Ecuadorian public hospitals. Methods: We analyzed hospital-based survey data from Ecuadorian public hospitals, restricted to adults attending a scheduled outpatient specialist consultation (n = 4,436). Emergency care, unscheduled urgent visits, procedures, and follow-up visits were excluded by design. Access pathway was classified from participants’ self-report as standardized (institutional or system-based) or non-standardized (informal or non-system-based). Waiting time, defined as the number of days between obtaining the appointment and attending the consultation, was compared using the Mann–Whitney U test. Sociodemographic correlates of non-standardized access were examined using adjusted logistic regression, and adjusted median differences were estimated using quantile regression (τ = 0.50). Effect modification by specialty referral requirement was assessed in a single median regression model using an interaction between access pathway and referral-requirement stratum. Results: Non-standardized access was associated with shorter waiting times than standardized access. In median regression adjusted for sociodemographic covariates, specialty, and hospital, with hospital-clustered inference, non-standardized access was associated with a 3.6-day shorter conditional median waiting time (95% CI −6.2 to −1.0). Adjusted stratum-specific contrasts were −7.9 days (95% CI −13.7 to −2.1) in direct-access specialties and −3.1 days (95% CI −5.9 to −0.2) in referral-required specialties; however, the interaction between access pathway and referral-requirement stratum was not statistically significant (p = 0.136). Conclusion: Among patients who attended a scheduled outpatient specialist consultation in Ecuadorian public hospitals, non-standardized access was associated with shorter waiting times. Although the adjusted point estimate was larger in direct-access specialties, the formal interaction test did not provide clear evidence that the association differed according to specialty referral requirement.
SN - 1932-6203
ER -