Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 53 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

Citizen science data as a tool for monitoring moss diversity in Poland: potential and limitations

  1. 1Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, Department of Geobotany and Plant Ecology, University of Lodz, ul. Banacha 12/16, Lodz, Poland
  2. 2Institute of Biology, University of Opole, ul. Kominka 6/6a, Opole, 45-032 Poland

Abstract

In this study, the potential and limitations of iNaturalist for monitoring mosses in Poland (2019–2025) were assessed using 17,451 verified “Research Grade” records. Rarefaction enabled diversity pattern analysis while accounting for sampling effort differences. Observational activity peaked in early-spring (March) and autumn (October). Analysis revealed extreme asymmetry in research effort (Gusers = 0.89): the 12 most active users contributed 65.5% of national records, creating a “super-user effect.” Rarefaction corrected this bias, identifying the Pomeranian Voivodeship as having the highest standardized diversity (Srar = 80.9). Citizen science effectively supports specific moss monitoring aspects. Observers documented 151 unique records of the alien moss Campylopus introflexus, representing over 60% of sites recorded during 30 years of traditional floristic research. Despite the “microscope barrier” restricting the database largely to visually identifiable bryophytes (e.g., reducing nearly the entire genus Hypnum to H. cupressiforme; Gtaxa = 0.76), iNaturalist serves as a crucial early-warning system. Ultimately, large-scale citizen scientists datasets provide valuable guidance for identifying priority areas for future bryological research.

Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-026-16092-5.

Related

  1. Five Decades of Citizen Science Reveal Erosion of Hotspots of Multifaceted Plant Diversity
    Viktoria Ferenc, Cornelia Krause, Jörn Pagel +5
    Global Change BiologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEcologyPMC
  2. Who Eats Whom? A global food web derived from citizen science
    Bradley C. Allf, Aditi Mallavarapu, David W. Kikuchi +2
    PLOS BiologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEcologyNutritionPLOS
  3. Americans’ multidimensional relationship with science: Is citizen science a path forward?
    Brooklynn N. Joyner, Lincoln R. Larson, Caren B. Cooper +2
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeurosciencePLOS
  4. The training–discovery paradox: Evidence from citizen science
    Shawn Ogunseye, Jeffrey Parsons, Roman Lukyanenko +1
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textNeuroscienceZoology & animal behaviourPLOSEurope PMCPMC
  5. Nationwide citizen science reveals core and rare osmotolerant yeast communities in Swedish honey
    K. Persson, M. Martindale, L. Winnicki +2
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textMicrobiologybioRxiv
BibTeX
@article{latoszewski2026citizen,
  title = {{Citizen science data as a tool for monitoring moss diversity in Poland: potential and limitations}},
  author = {Mikołaj Latoszewski and Paweł Świsłowski and Małgorzata Rajfur and Grzegorz J. Wolski},
  journal = {Environmental Monitoring and Assessment},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1007/s10661-026-16092-5},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-026-16092-5},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Citizen science data as a tool for monitoring moss diversity in Poland: potential and limitations
AU  - Mikołaj Latoszewski
AU  - Paweł Świsłowski
AU  - Małgorzata Rajfur
AU  - Grzegorz J. Wolski
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/26
JO  - Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
DO  - 10.1007/s10661-026-16092-5
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-026-16092-5
AB  - In this study, the potential and limitations of iNaturalist for monitoring mosses in Poland (2019–2025) were assessed using 17,451 verified “Research Grade” records. Rarefaction enabled diversity pattern analysis while accounting for sampling effort differences. Observational activity peaked in early-spring (March) and autumn (October). Analysis revealed extreme asymmetry in research effort (Gusers = 0.89): the 12 most active users contributed 65.5% of national records, creating a “super-user effect.” Rarefaction corrected this bias, identifying the Pomeranian Voivodeship as having the highest standardized diversity (Srar = 80.9). Citizen science effectively supports specific moss monitoring aspects. Observers documented 151 unique records of the alien moss Campylopus introflexus, representing over 60% of sites recorded during 30 years of traditional floristic research. Despite the “microscope barrier” restricting the database largely to visually identifiable bryophytes (e.g., reducing nearly the entire genus Hypnum to H. cupressiforme; Gtaxa = 0.76), iNaturalist serves as a crucial early-warning system. Ultimately, large-scale citizen scientists datasets provide valuable guidance for identifying priority areas for future bryological research.  Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-026-16092-5.
SN  - 0167-6369
SN  - 1573-2959
ER  -