Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 10 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0PLOS One

Talca no es Santiago: Moral geography, rurality, and infrastructure of possibility in LGBTIQA+ violence and survival

  1. 1Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Talca, Chile

Abstract

Background: Violence against LGBTIQA+ individuals is not limited to discrete acts of aggression. It also constitutes a territorial ecology that unevenly distributes habitability, safety, and recognition. This study examines how the statement “Talca is not Santiago” works as more than a comment on city size: it names a moral geography where reputation, social surveillance, and uneven access to infrastructure produce distinct thresholds of visibility, risk, and agency. Methods: We used Reflexive Thematic Analysis (RTA) following Braun and Clarke to analyze a subcorpus of seven individual interviews and one focus group (n = 7) conducted in Talca and one focus group (n = 5) conducted in Santiago, drawn from a broader research project according to predefined criteria (density of territorial references and representation of both study sites). Reporting follows COREQ guidelines (S1 Checklist). We recruited participants through LGBTIQA+ organizations and social networks; participants self-identified with non-hegemonic sexual-gender identities, were over 18, and reported subjective experiences of violence. The analytical sample is composed predominantly of young (19–35 years) university-educated participants, with representation of cisgender, transmasculine, and non-binary identities and no trans women. We calibrate the scope of our conclusions accordingly. Results: We constructed three themes: (1) Infrastructure of possibility—LGBTIQA+ life becomes practicable or precarious depending on available circuits of information, networks, and spaces; (2) Surveillance and reputation—in medium-sized cities and rural environments, social legibility intensifies daily control and shrinks the margin to maneuver, which also affects the possibility of leaving violent relationships; (3) Mobility and education as partial territorial rupture—moving for studies and traveling through urban circuits reconfigures future horizons without erasing access asymmetries. Conclusions: Within the scope of a young, predominantly cisgender, university-educated sample, territorial scale operates as a constitutive condition of violence and survival, not as a backdrop. Interventions on LGBTIQA+ violence therefore need to address territorial conditions: connectivity, information circulation, community spaces, and confidentiality safeguards adapted to medium-sized cities and ruralities.

Related

  1. Behavioural Profile of Agility Dogs Using the Mini‐CBARQ in Santiago de Chile
    Sofia Torres, Paola Mujica, Hernan Cañon Jones
    Veterinary Medicine InternationalPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGenetics & genomicsPMCEurope PMC
  2. Beyond elevation: climate, geography, and the diversification of Himalayan Rhododendrons. A commentary on ‘Phenotypic and genetic variation among Rhododendron arboreum species complex widely distributed throughout the Himalayas suggests an obscure geographic origin of the clade’
    Dinesh Thakur, Manish Kumar Sharma, Nikita Rathore
    Annals of BotanyPeer-reviewedPublisher termsFull textEvolutionary biologyPMC
  3. The nature of science in Chinese senior secondary geography textbooks under the context of sustainable development: Identifying the gaps and seeking reform
    Weirui Zhang, Xiangdong Wang, Changhong Wu +1
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeurosciencePLOS
  4. Genomic variation in Sydowia polyspora in relation to geography and host symptom severity
    Temitope Folorunso, Gabriel Silva, Rabiu Olatinwo +2
    EcoEvoRxivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGenetics & genomicsEcoEvoRxiv
  5. Who reads the Earth's archives? Geography, Income, and the Uneven Evidence Base for a Shared Planet
    Lingli Fan, Yiming Lei, Yufei Chen +7
    EcoEvoRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textEcologyEcoEvoRxiv
BibTeX
@article{fuentes2026talca,
  title = {{Talca no es Santiago: Moral geography, rurality, and infrastructure of possibility in LGBTIQA+ violence and survival}},
  author = {Wilson Orlando Albornoz Fuentes and Cecilia Del Pilar Valenzuela Gajardo and Thiare Anaís Cid Ramírez},
  journal = {PLOS One},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0360622},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0360622},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Talca no es Santiago: Moral geography, rurality, and infrastructure of possibility in LGBTIQA+ violence and survival
AU  - Wilson Orlando Albornoz Fuentes
AU  - Cecilia Del Pilar Valenzuela Gajardo
AU  - Thiare Anaís Cid Ramírez
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/14
JO  - PLOS One
DO  - 10.1371/journal.pone.0360622
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0360622
AB  - Background: Violence against LGBTIQA+ individuals is not limited to discrete acts of aggression. It also constitutes a territorial ecology that unevenly distributes habitability, safety, and recognition. This study examines how the statement “Talca is not Santiago” works as more than a comment on city size: it names a moral geography where reputation, social surveillance, and uneven access to infrastructure produce distinct thresholds of visibility, risk, and agency. Methods: We used Reflexive Thematic Analysis (RTA) following Braun and Clarke to analyze a subcorpus of seven individual interviews and one focus group (n = 7) conducted in Talca and one focus group (n = 5) conducted in Santiago, drawn from a broader research project according to predefined criteria (density of territorial references and representation of both study sites). Reporting follows COREQ guidelines (S1 Checklist). We recruited participants through LGBTIQA+ organizations and social networks; participants self-identified with non-hegemonic sexual-gender identities, were over 18, and reported subjective experiences of violence. The analytical sample is composed predominantly of young (19–35 years) university-educated participants, with representation of cisgender, transmasculine, and non-binary identities and no trans women. We calibrate the scope of our conclusions accordingly. Results: We constructed three themes: (1) Infrastructure of possibility—LGBTIQA+ life becomes practicable or precarious depending on available circuits of information, networks, and spaces; (2) Surveillance and reputation—in medium-sized cities and rural environments, social legibility intensifies daily control and shrinks the margin to maneuver, which also affects the possibility of leaving violent relationships; (3) Mobility and education as partial territorial rupture—moving for studies and traveling through urban circuits reconfigures future horizons without erasing access asymmetries. Conclusions: Within the scope of a young, predominantly cisgender, university-educated sample, territorial scale operates as a constitutive condition of violence and survival, not as a backdrop. Interventions on LGBTIQA+ violence therefore need to address territorial conditions: connectivity, information circulation, community spaces, and confidentiality safeguards adapted to medium-sized cities and ruralities.
SN  - 1932-6203
ER  -