Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 19 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Medvedev logic is undecidable

Abstract

We show that Medvedev's logic of finite problems, a well-known superintuitionistic logic, is undecidable. The key method is a reduction from the periodic tiling problem to non-theoremhood in Medvedev's logic. This settles a longstanding open problem. Using similar techniques, but reducing instead to the ordinary tiling problem, we likewise obtain undecidability of Skvortsov's logic of infinite problems, and the fact that the two logics are distinct -- in fact, they are separated by any aperiodic tiling of the plane. Due to the fact that Medvedev's logic figures in so many different areas, these results have implications for several fields -- for example, the study of schematic fragments of logics such as propositional dependence logic, or the study of internal logics of toposes. The core idea and technical work of the undecidability proof were obtained using ChatGPT Sol 5.6, and formally verified in Lean by Claude Opus 5. A detailed methodology section outlines how such results were obtained.

Related

  1. Medvedev Logic is Not Decidable. It is π01 -complete. Who Would Have Guessed?
    Pawel Pawlowski
    arXivPreprintCC0Full textLogic & foundationsarXiv
  2. Medvedev degrees of SFTs on cocompact Fuchsian groups
    Sebastián Barbieri, Nicanor Carrasco-Vargas, Paul Toussaint
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAlgebra & number theoryDynamical systemsarXiv
  3. On the complexity of Medvedev reducibility
    Remi Pallen
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textLogic & foundationsarXiv
  4. An undecidable problem in dynamics
    Jason Bell
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAlgebra & number theoryDynamical systemsarXiv
  5. The Global Asymptotic Stability Problem for Linear MPC Is Undecidable
    Johan Löfberg
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textOptimisation & controlarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{almeida2026medvedev,
  title = {{Medvedev logic is undecidable}},
  author = {Rodrigo Nicolau Almeida and Søren Brinck Knudstorp},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.13359},
  eprint = {2609.13359},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.13359},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Medvedev logic is undecidable
AU  - Rodrigo Nicolau Almeida
AU  - Søren Brinck Knudstorp
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/11
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.13359
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.13359
AB  - We show that Medvedev's logic of finite problems, a well-known superintuitionistic logic, is undecidable. The key method is a reduction from the periodic tiling problem to non-theoremhood in Medvedev's logic. This settles a longstanding open problem. Using similar techniques, but reducing instead to the ordinary tiling problem, we likewise obtain undecidability of Skvortsov's logic of infinite problems, and the fact that the two logics are distinct -- in fact, they are separated by any aperiodic tiling of the plane. Due to the fact that Medvedev's logic figures in so many different areas, these results have implications for several fields -- for example, the study of schematic fragments of logics such as propositional dependence logic, or the study of internal logics of toposes. The core idea and technical work of the undecidability proof were obtained using ChatGPT Sol 5.6, and formally verified in Lean by Claude Opus 5. A detailed methodology section outlines how such results were obtained.
ER  -