Biomechanical and Neuromuscular Comparison of Horizontal and Vertical Squat Jumps
Abstract
Trama, S, Macchi, R, Pâris, B, Bertin, D, Regnaud, J, Nicol, C, and Hays, A. Biomechanical and neuromuscular comparison of horizontal and vertical squat jumps. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000–000, 2026—Compared with the vertical squat jump (VSJ), the horizontal squat jump (HSJ) offers a safer alternative, as the jumper performs it while lying down, which also eliminates landing impact. The aim of this study was to investigate the mechanical outputs from each test, with the potential to guide future applications in training and rehabilitation programs. Sixteen male athletes performed VSJ at body mass (BM) and HSJ on a frictionless sled at 0, 20, 40, 60, 80, and 100% BM. Force plates and linear encoders were used to measure peak force /BM , mean force /BM , mean net force, net impulse, rate of force development (RFD/BM ), time to peak force, velocity at takeoff (Vto), mean linear velocity (Vmean ), peak power /BM , and push-off distance (Hpo). Hip, knee, and ankle angular velocities were recorded in parallel with the surface electromyographic (EMG) activity of 7 lower-limb muscles. All HSJ conditions showed lower Vto, V mean , and peak power /BM than VSJ ( p < 0.001), mainly due to a shorter Hpo ( p < 0.001). In terms of force production, HSJ had higher values for mean net force, RFD /BM , F max/BM (40–100% BM), and F mean/BM (80–100% BM) than VSJ ( p < 0.05). Regardless of the load, the slope of EMG activity of all lower-limb extensors increased more sharply in the HSJ than in the VSJ, particularly for the gluteus maximus (GMax). In rehabilitation or training contexts, the HSJ should be prioritized to enhance explosive strength and motor unit recruitment, whereas the VSJ may be more suitable for improving force production at higher velocities than in the HSJ. In addition, the HSJ appears to be a promising exercise for activating the GMax.
Related
- Refining Home-Based Squat Training: The Role of Hip Adduction in Improving Neuromuscular Control for Clinically Diagnosed Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome.
- Goldfish keratocyte migration dynamics differ among horizontal, vertical, and clinorotation conditions
- The impact of ESG peer pressure on corporate green transformation under dual horizontal and vertical networks
- Modeling the effects of horizontal and vertical road geometries on traffic crashes in rural roads
- Bilateral Comparison of Passive Shoulder Horizontal Adduction Range of Motion in Elite Tennis Players
BibTeX
@article{trama2026biomechanical,
title = {{Biomechanical and Neuromuscular Comparison of Horizontal and Vertical Squat Jumps}},
author = {Samuel Trama and Robin Macchi and Benjamin Pâris and Denis Bertin and Justin Regnaud and Caroline Nicol and Arnaud Hays},
journal = {Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.1519/jsc.0000000000005658},
url = {https://hal.science/hal-05737081v1},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Biomechanical and Neuromuscular Comparison of Horizontal and Vertical Squat Jumps
AU - Samuel Trama
AU - Robin Macchi
AU - Benjamin Pâris
AU - Denis Bertin
AU - Justin Regnaud
AU - Caroline Nicol
AU - Arnaud Hays
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/01
JO - Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
DO - 10.1519/jsc.0000000000005658
UR - https://hal.science/hal-05737081v1
AB - Trama, S, Macchi, R, Pâris, B, Bertin, D, Regnaud, J, Nicol, C, and Hays, A. Biomechanical and neuromuscular comparison of horizontal and vertical squat jumps. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000–000, 2026—Compared with the vertical squat jump (VSJ), the horizontal squat jump (HSJ) offers a safer alternative, as the jumper performs it while lying down, which also eliminates landing impact. The aim of this study was to investigate the mechanical outputs from each test, with the potential to guide future applications in training and rehabilitation programs. Sixteen male athletes performed VSJ at body mass (BM) and HSJ on a frictionless sled at 0, 20, 40, 60, 80, and 100% BM. Force plates and linear encoders were used to measure peak force /BM , mean force /BM , mean net force, net impulse, rate of force development (RFD/BM ), time to peak force, velocity at takeoff (Vto), mean linear velocity (Vmean ), peak power /BM , and push-off distance (Hpo). Hip, knee, and ankle angular velocities were recorded in parallel with the surface electromyographic (EMG) activity of 7 lower-limb muscles. All HSJ conditions showed lower Vto, V mean , and peak power /BM than VSJ ( p < 0.001), mainly due to a shorter Hpo ( p < 0.001). In terms of force production, HSJ had higher values for mean net force, RFD /BM , F max/BM (40–100% BM), and F mean/BM (80–100% BM) than VSJ ( p < 0.05). Regardless of the load, the slope of EMG activity of all lower-limb extensors increased more sharply in the HSJ than in the VSJ, particularly for the gluteus maximus (GMax). In rehabilitation or training contexts, the HSJ should be prioritized to enhance explosive strength and motor unit recruitment, whereas the VSJ may be more suitable for improving force production at higher velocities than in the HSJ. In addition, the HSJ appears to be a promising exercise for activating the GMax.
SN - 1064-8011
SN - 1533-4287
ER -