Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 14 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-SAJournal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry

Comparative evaluation of a novel dual sensory stimulation technique for reducing dental anxiety and improving behavior in pediatric patients: A randomized controlled trial

Abstract

Background and Aim: Dental anxiety can compromise children’s cooperation during dental treatment. Although distraction is widely used for behavior guidance, evidence comparing dual-sensory distraction techniques with conventional management remains limited. This study evaluated the effectiveness of audiovisual and visual-olfactory dual-sensory stimulation for reducing dental anxiety and improving behavior in pediatric patients. Materials and Methods: This randomized controlled trial included 138 healthy pediatric patients aged 4–7 years who were allocated equally to audiovisual distraction, visual-olfactory distraction using jasmine oil, or tell-show-do management. Anxiety and behavior were assessed before and after treatment using the Chhota Bheem–Chutki Scale and Venham’s Picture Test. Pulse rate and oxygen saturation (SpO2) were also recorded. Data were analyzed using a paired t-test, one-way analysis of variance, and Kruskal–Wallis test, with significance set at P < 0.05. Results: Both dual-sensory distraction techniques significantly reduced anxiety and improved cooperative behavior. Compared with Tell-Show-Do, both interventions produced better post-treatment behavioral outcomes; audiovisual distraction additionally showed a significant improvement in SpO2. Pulse-rate reduction was comparable among groups. Conclusion: Dual-sensory distraction is an effective non-pharmacological strategy for managing anxiety and improving behavior in pediatric dental patients, with audiovisual distraction showing greater effectiveness.

Related

  1. Comparative outcomes of conventional follitropin delta 15 µg/day versus follitropin alfa 225 IU/day for ovarian stimulation: results from an exploratory post hoc analysis of Spanish participants from the ADAPT-1 randomized controlled trial
    Marta García Sánchez, Andrea Bernabeu, Ana Hernández Cesteros +7
    Frontiers in reproductive healthPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Comparative evaluation of the antipyretic and analgesic efficacy and safety of a fast-release paracetamol 650 mg formulation vs. conventional paracetamol formulations in adults with acute febrile or febrile-pain conditions: a multicenter randomized controlled trial
    Susobhan Mondal, S. K. Ashik Ikbal, Sumit Agrawal +11
    Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Comparative evaluation of mineral trioxide aggregate, diode and erbium, chromium-doped yttrium, scandium, gallium, and garnet laser-assisted mineral trioxide aggregate pulpotomy in primary molars – A randomized controlled trial
    Vishal Vishal, Gyanendra Kumar, Mridula Goswami +2
    Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive DentistryPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-SAFull textGeneral medicineDOAJ
  4. Comparative Evaluation of Two Commercially Available Topical Gels As Adjuncts to Scaling and Root Planing for Gingival Inflammation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Abhishek Sharma, Ajay Mahajan, Kanwarjit Singh Asi
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Closed Versus Open Vent Port Techniques and the Disconnection Technique for Optimizing Lung Collapse With Bronchial Blockers in Video‐Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Juan Yao, Ya‐Jing Chen, Fang‐Ming Shen +6
    The clinical respiratory journalPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{puri2026comparative,
  title = {{Comparative evaluation of a novel dual sensory stimulation technique for reducing dental anxiety and improving behavior in pediatric patients: A randomized controlled trial}},
  author = {Namrata Puri and Gauri Kalra and Madhulika Srivastava and Tanu Nangia and Carrolene Langpoklakpam and Sonvita Debnath},
  journal = {Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.4103/jisppd.jisppd_344_26},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.4103/jisppd.jisppd_344_26},
  note = {CC BY-NC-SA},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Comparative evaluation of a novel dual sensory stimulation technique for reducing dental anxiety and improving behavior in pediatric patients: A randomized controlled trial
AU  - Namrata Puri
AU  - Gauri Kalra
AU  - Madhulika Srivastava
AU  - Tanu Nangia
AU  - Carrolene Langpoklakpam
AU  - Sonvita Debnath
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/01
JO  - Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry
DO  - 10.4103/jisppd.jisppd_344_26
UR  - https://doi.org/10.4103/jisppd.jisppd_344_26
AB  - Background and Aim: Dental anxiety can compromise children’s cooperation during dental treatment. Although distraction is widely used for behavior guidance, evidence comparing dual-sensory distraction techniques with conventional management remains limited. This study evaluated the effectiveness of audiovisual and visual-olfactory dual-sensory stimulation for reducing dental anxiety and improving behavior in pediatric patients. Materials and Methods: This randomized controlled trial included 138 healthy pediatric patients aged 4–7 years who were allocated equally to audiovisual distraction, visual-olfactory distraction using jasmine oil, or tell-show-do management. Anxiety and behavior were assessed before and after treatment using the Chhota Bheem–Chutki Scale and Venham’s Picture Test. Pulse rate and oxygen saturation (SpO2) were also recorded. Data were analyzed using a paired t-test, one-way analysis of variance, and Kruskal–Wallis test, with significance set at P < 0.05. Results: Both dual-sensory distraction techniques significantly reduced anxiety and improved cooperative behavior. Compared with Tell-Show-Do, both interventions produced better post-treatment behavioral outcomes; audiovisual distraction additionally showed a significant improvement in SpO2. Pulse-rate reduction was comparable among groups. Conclusion: Dual-sensory distraction is an effective non-pharmacological strategy for managing anxiety and improving behavior in pediatric dental patients, with audiovisual distraction showing greater effectiveness.
SN  - 0970-4388
SN  - 1998-3905
ER  -