Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 29 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Representation Redundancy and Structural Complexity in Finite-Field Inversion

Abstract

The representation chosen for a mathematical operation can affect both its algebraic form and its empirical learning difficulty. We study this phenomenon for inversion over 𝔽2n, with field elements expressed in varying ordered 𝔽2-bases. We prove that two ordered bases induce the same coordinate inversion map if and only if they belong to the same Galois orbit. Since every orbit has size n, the correspondence between ordered bases and distinct inversion maps is exactly n-to-one. We then analyze three Boolean formulations of inversion. The reference formulation has algebraic degree nβˆ’1 and joint ANF leap 1, the mixed representation formulation has degree 2(nβˆ’1) and joint ANF leap 2, and the complete raw formulation has degree at most 3(nβˆ’1) and joint ANF leap at least n. Exhaustive computations agree with the theoretical results and bounds in the cases considered. Controlled experiments with multilayer perceptrons show the same ordering in learning difficulty, while Galois orbit redundancy provides only a limited generalization benefit under the tested conditions. These results show that exact redundancy among representations can coexist with changes in Boolean structure and learning behavior when the representation is exposed as part of the input.

Related

  1. Representation Redundancy and Algebraic Complexity in Finite-Field Inversion
    Zheng Zhang, Na Zhang
    MathematicsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0General mathematicsCrossref
  2. Iterating the Lehmer code on inversion sequences: Catalan fixed points and finite stabilization
    Julian Allagan, Shanzhen Gao, Benjamin Testart
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsarXiv
  3. Latent Inversion of Material Coefficients from Boundary Data via Finite Tests and Neural Surrogates
    Erik Burman, Mats G. Larson, Karl Larsson +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textNumerical analysis & scientific computingarXiv
  4. Finite Normal Forms and Causal Inversion for Fractional Operator Algebras
    Adel Kassaian
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textGeneral mathematicsarXiv
  5. Representation zeta functions of wreath products with finite groups
    Laurent Bartholdi, Pierre de La Harpe
    Groups, Geometry, and DynamicsPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text5 citedAlgebra & number theoryHAL
BibTeX
@misc{zhang2026representation,
  title = {{Representation Redundancy and Structural Complexity in Finite-Field Inversion}},
  author = {Zheng Zhang and Na Zhang},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.04583},
  eprint = {2609.04583},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.04583},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Representation Redundancy and Structural Complexity in Finite-Field Inversion
AU  - Zheng Zhang
AU  - Na Zhang
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/04
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.04583
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.04583
AB  - The representation chosen for a mathematical operation can affect both its algebraic form and its empirical learning difficulty. We study this phenomenon for inversion over 𝔽_2^n, with field elements expressed in varying ordered 𝔽_2-bases. We prove that two ordered bases induce the same coordinate inversion map if and only if they belong to the same Galois orbit. Since every orbit has size n, the correspondence between ordered bases and distinct inversion maps is exactly n-to-one. We then analyze three Boolean formulations of inversion. The reference formulation has algebraic degree nβˆ’1 and joint ANF leap 1, the mixed representation formulation has degree 2(nβˆ’1) and joint ANF leap 2, and the complete raw formulation has degree at most 3(nβˆ’1) and joint ANF leap at least n. Exhaustive computations agree with the theoretical results and bounds in the cases considered. Controlled experiments with multilayer perceptrons show the same ordering in learning difficulty, while Galois orbit redundancy provides only a limited generalization benefit under the tested conditions. These results show that exact redundancy among representations can coexist with changes in Boolean structure and learning behavior when the representation is exposed as part of the input.
ER  -