Development of a hybrid artificial intelligence framework for pharmacotherapy optimization
6 affiliations
- 1Institute of Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Biology and Clinical Pharmacy, Paracelsus Medical University, Strubergasse 15, 5020 Salzburg, Austria
- 2Center of Public Health and Health Services Research, Paracelsus Medical University, Strubergasse 21, 5020 Salzburg, Austria
- 3Vorarlberg Institute for Vascular Investigation and Treatment (VIVIT), Carinagasse 47, 6800 Feldkirch, Austria
- 4Institute for Process Management and Digital Transformation (IPD), FH Münster, Corrensstraße 25, 48149 Münster, Germany
- 5University of Applied Sciences of Upper Austria, Softwarepark 11, 4232 Hagenberg, Austria
- 6Faculty of Medicine, Division of Pharmacy, University of Pristina, Str. Bulevardi I Dëshmorëve, 10000 Prishtina, Republic of Kosovo
Abstract
Introduction: Pharmacotherapy optimization in multimorbid patients is increasingly complex due to polypharmacy, fragmented data, expanding electronic health records, and workforce constraints. Conventional clinical decision support systems remain largely rule-based and often fail to adequately incorporate patient-specific context. While artificial intelligence offers new opportunities, stand-alone models remain insufficiently reliable for high-risk pharmacotherapy decision support.
Aim: To develop a relevance-driven, clinician-supervised hybrid AI framework for pharmacotherapy optimization.
Method: Using a design science-informed approach, an interdisciplinary research group developed a conceptual framework for AI-supported pharmacotherapy optimization. Framework development was informed by prior feasibility work, published literature, clinical practice requirements, and iterative interdisciplinary discussions. Hybrid AI was defined as the combination of retrieval-augmented generation, deterministic safety rules, and large language model reasoning.
Results: Seven design principles were identified, including decomposition of clinical activities, relevance-based prioritization, hybrid reasoning under clinician oversight, integration of patient goals, transparency of evidence sources, longitudinal optimization within a governed closed loop, and evaluation as a design requirement. These principles informed a conceptual architecture integrating structured clinical data, patient preferences, longitudinal patient information, and evidence retrieval within a clinician-governed decision-support framework.
Conclusion: The proposed framework conceptualizes AI as a relevance-structuring, clinician-governed decision-support layer rather than an autonomous decision-maker. By combining hybrid reasoning, patient-specific context, and professional oversight, it provides a conceptual foundation for future development, implementation, and evaluation of AI-supported pharmacotherapy systems.
Related
- An intelligent internet of things-based artificial intelligence framework for adaptive mechanical process control and real-time performance optimization
- Artificial Intelligence‐Assisted Automated Optical Coherence Tomography Analysis for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Planning: From Plaque Analysis to Precision Lesion Preparation and Stent Optimization
- An Artificial Intelligence Supervision Program to Improve Video-Observed Therapy for Managing Tuberculosis Treatment: Development and Validation Study
- Development and validation of an artificial intelligence model for basal cell carcinoma detection and section completeness assessment in Mohs micrographic surgery in an Asian cohort
- Wetter’s Digital Twin: A Patient-Specific Framework for Artificial Intelligence and Healthcare
BibTeX
@article{rose2026development,
title = {{Development of a hybrid artificial intelligence framework for pharmacotherapy optimization}},
author = {Olaf Rose and Stephanie Clemens and Andreas Leiherer and Michael Bücker and Finn Petersson and Gerald Lirk and Christopher Mosch and Johanna Pachmayr and Kreshnik Hoti},
journal = {International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy},
year = {2026},
month = aug,
doi = {10.1007/s11096-026-02205-0},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-026-02205-0},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Development of a hybrid artificial intelligence framework for pharmacotherapy optimization
AU - Olaf Rose
AU - Stephanie Clemens
AU - Andreas Leiherer
AU - Michael Bücker
AU - Finn Petersson
AU - Gerald Lirk
AU - Christopher Mosch
AU - Johanna Pachmayr
AU - Kreshnik Hoti
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/08/21
JO - International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
DO - 10.1007/s11096-026-02205-0
UR - https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-026-02205-0
AB - Introduction: Pharmacotherapy optimization in multimorbid patients is increasingly complex due to polypharmacy, fragmented data, expanding electronic health records, and workforce constraints. Conventional clinical decision support systems remain largely rule-based and often fail to adequately incorporate patient-specific context. While artificial intelligence offers new opportunities, stand-alone models remain insufficiently reliable for high-risk pharmacotherapy decision support. Aim: To develop a relevance-driven, clinician-supervised hybrid AI framework for pharmacotherapy optimization. Method: Using a design science-informed approach, an interdisciplinary research group developed a conceptual framework for AI-supported pharmacotherapy optimization. Framework development was informed by prior feasibility work, published literature, clinical practice requirements, and iterative interdisciplinary discussions. Hybrid AI was defined as the combination of retrieval-augmented generation, deterministic safety rules, and large language model reasoning. Results: Seven design principles were identified, including decomposition of clinical activities, relevance-based prioritization, hybrid reasoning under clinician oversight, integration of patient goals, transparency of evidence sources, longitudinal optimization within a governed closed loop, and evaluation as a design requirement. These principles informed a conceptual architecture integrating structured clinical data, patient preferences, longitudinal patient information, and evidence retrieval within a clinician-governed decision-support framework. Conclusion: The proposed framework conceptualizes AI as a relevance-structuring, clinician-governed decision-support layer rather than an autonomous decision-maker. By combining hybrid reasoning, patient-specific context, and professional oversight, it provides a conceptual foundation for future development, implementation, and evaluation of AI-supported pharmacotherapy systems.
SN - 2210-7703
SN - 2210-7711
ER -