Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,818 studies31 sourcesUpdated 33 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Physical Therapy

Sustained three-year impact of a physical therapy quality improvement project in the medical intensive care unit

Abstract

Importance: Early rehabilitation and mobility are components of care bundles and clinical practice guidelines for patients who are critically ill. Improved delivery of physical therapy is associated with decreased intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS). Barriers exist to optimizing the delivery of physical therapy. Analyses of quality improvement (QI) are often narrow in scope. Care improvements may not persist. Opportunities remain to improve physical therapy delivery to patients in the medical ICU (MICU) while analyzing care delivery and ICU LOS.

Objective: The objective was to determine whether a QI initiative sustained improvement in physical therapy delivery and associations with ICU LOS in the MICU.

Design: This was a before–during–after comparative design.

Setting: The study took place in the MICU at a quaternary, academic medical center.

Participants: The study included 13,058 MICU admissions.

Intervention(s): The intervention was a multifaceted physical therapy program including multidisciplinary education, physical therapists integrated into multidisciplinary rounds, automatic physical therapist consult orders, electronic health record hard stop for bedrest orders, and increased physical therapy staffing including a program coordinator physical therapist.

Main Outcome(s): Our primary outcomes were delivery, timing, and frequency of physical therapy, as well as ICU LOS.

Measure(s): Main outcomes were assessed by (1) odds of receiving physical therapy while in the MICU and (2) time from MICU admission to first physical therapist session and (3) ICU LOS.

Results: During the intervention, an increased proportion of admits received physical therapy with a nearly 4-fold increase in the odds of receiving physical therapy. Time to first physical therapist session was decreased while the proportion of days with physical therapy in the ICU was increased. In adjusted analysis, ICU LOS decreased modestly. Findings were similar for 3 years post-QI.

Conclusions: Despite variable resources and increased illness severity in the post-intervention period, durable improvements in the percentage of patients receiving physical therapy, odds of receiving physical therapy, time to physical therapy, and proportion of days with physical therapy occurred for 3 years post-QI. Secondarily, the during and post periods were associated with modest reductions in ICU LOS.

Relevance: This work is applicable to the fields of: critical care rehabilitation, quality improvement, ICU mobility, and health care delivery.

Related

  1. A Behavior-Based Quality Improvement Initiative for Intensive Care Unit Calmness: A Single-Center Before-After Evaluation
    Dhivahar Ganesan, Raghunath Doraiswamy, Athira Rajkumar
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Failed quality improvement project to improve adherence to CAM-ICU and RASS documentation in a tertiary intensive care unit: a cautionary tale.
    Yu Shen Chong, Anna Batho, Annalisa Miller +1
    BMJ open qualityPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Restrictive Potassium Supplementation Strategy in a General Intensive Care Unit: A Before-and-After Quality Improvement Audit in a Mixed Critical Care Population
    Deveshwar Bhalla, Rasi Mizori, Waqas Akhtar +6
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Sustained pain improvement and IL-12-related biomarker changes in rheumatoid arthritis patients initiating baricitinib or TNF inhibitor therapy
    Christine Behrendt, Khetam Ghannam, Monika Brunner-Weinzierl +4
    EULAR Rheumatology OpenPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral medicinePMCEurope PMC
  5. Incidence and prevention of postprocedural bacteraemia and complications following water vapour therapy of the prostate: a retrospective review and quality improvement initiative at a tertiary care centre
    Elias Tannous, Waleed Hassan, Jeffrey Chapman +6
    Infection prevention in practicePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{watson2026sustained,
  title = {{Sustained three-year impact of a physical therapy quality improvement project in the medical intensive care unit}},
  author = {Megan A Watson and Ryan Peterson and Sarah E Jolley and William Niehaus and Kyle J Ridgeway},
  journal = {Physical Therapy},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.1093/ptj/pzag100},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzag100},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Sustained three-year impact of a physical therapy quality improvement project in the medical intensive care unit
AU  - Megan A Watson
AU  - Ryan Peterson
AU  - Sarah E Jolley
AU  - William Niehaus
AU  - Kyle J Ridgeway
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/21
JO  - Physical Therapy
DO  - 10.1093/ptj/pzag100
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzag100
AB  - Importance: Early rehabilitation and mobility are components of care bundles and clinical practice guidelines for patients who are critically ill. Improved delivery of physical therapy is associated with decreased intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS). Barriers exist to optimizing the delivery of physical therapy. Analyses of quality improvement (QI) are often narrow in scope. Care improvements may not persist. Opportunities remain to improve physical therapy delivery to patients in the medical ICU (MICU) while analyzing care delivery and ICU LOS.  Objective: The objective was to determine whether a QI initiative sustained improvement in physical therapy delivery and associations with ICU LOS in the MICU.  Design: This was a before–during–after comparative design.  Setting: The study took place in the MICU at a quaternary, academic medical center.  Participants: The study included 13,058 MICU admissions.  Intervention(s): The intervention was a multifaceted physical therapy program including multidisciplinary education, physical therapists integrated into multidisciplinary rounds, automatic physical therapist consult orders, electronic health record hard stop for bedrest orders, and increased physical therapy staffing including a program coordinator physical therapist.  Main Outcome(s): Our primary outcomes were delivery, timing, and frequency of physical therapy, as well as ICU LOS.  Measure(s): Main outcomes were assessed by (1) odds of receiving physical therapy while in the MICU and (2) time from MICU admission to first physical therapist session and (3) ICU LOS.  Results: During the intervention, an increased proportion of admits received physical therapy with a nearly 4-fold increase in the odds of receiving physical therapy. Time to first physical therapist session was decreased while the proportion of days with physical therapy in the ICU was increased. In adjusted analysis, ICU LOS decreased modestly. Findings were similar for 3 years post-QI.  Conclusions: Despite variable resources and increased illness severity in the post-intervention period, durable improvements in the percentage of patients receiving physical therapy, odds of receiving physical therapy, time to physical therapy, and proportion of days with physical therapy occurred for 3 years post-QI. Secondarily, the during and post periods were associated with modest reductions in ICU LOS.  Relevance: This work is applicable to the fields of: critical care rehabilitation, quality improvement, ICU mobility, and health care delivery.
SN  - 0031-9023
SN  - 1538-6724
ER  -