The pervasive socio-economic and psychological burden of onchocerciasis in endemic communities of Bo District, Sierra Leone: an explanatory sequential mixed-methods study.
4 affiliations
- 1Department of Public Health, School of Medical Health Sciences, Njala University, Bo Campus, Bo, Sierra Leone. [email protected].
- 2Department of Public Health, School of Community Health Sciences, Njala University, Bo Campus, Bo, Sierra Leone. [email protected].
- 3Ernest Bai Koroma University of Science and Technology, Port Loko Campus, Port Loko, Sierra Leone.
- 4School of Medical Health Sciences, Njala University, Bo Campus, Bo, Sierra Leone.
Abstract
Background
Onchocerciasis (river blindness) persists in Bo District, Sierra Leone, despite decades of ivermectin-based mass drug administration (MDA). Programmatic efforts have prioritized parasitological and ocular outcomes, so the socio-economic and psychological burden of the disease within affected communities remains poorly quantified. We aimed to determine the magnitude, structure and distribution of this non-clinical burden.Methods
We used an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design (QUAN → qual). In the quantitative phase, 1,500 adults across five endemic chiefdoms of Bo District (Bagbwe, Baoma, Gbo, Selenga, Tikonko) were surveyed using multistage cluster sampling. Socio-economic impact (range 0-2) and psychological impact (range 0-3) were each measured with a formative composite index summing binary items on economic hardship, education/employment obstacles, emotional well-being, social stigma, and self-esteem. Instruments were forward- and back-translated into Mende, pilot-tested (Cronbach's α = 0.76-0.81), and administered on Android tablets using ODK Collect. We used chi-square tests, one-way ANOVA, independent-samples t-tests and Spearman correlation in JASP (v0.18). Eleven key informant interviews and eight focus group discussions (five participants each, n = 40) were analysed thematically to explain the quantitative findings. Ethical approval was granted by the Njala University Institutional Review Board (NUIRB) on 14 April 2024.Results
The burden was extensive: 71.7% (95% CI 69.4-74.0) of respondents reported economic hardship and 95.8% (95% CI 94.7-96.7) scored at least one psychological impact. The socio-economic and psychological indices were statistically independent (ρ = .026, p = .311) and did not differ significantly across chiefdoms (F(4,1495) = 1.91, p = .106), sexes (t(1498) = 0.26, p = .796), or age groups (F(2,1497) = 0.80, p = .451). Qualitative themes described a productivity-poverty cycle, stigma experienced as "social death," and an unrecognized gendered caregiving load.Conclusions
Onchocerciasis imposes a pervasive, uniformly distributed dual burden in Bo District that is invisible to parasitological surveillance. Morbidity-management, stigma-reduction and psychosocial support should be delivered population-wide and integrated into primary healthcare and MDA delivery rather than targeted narrowly at demographic risk groups.
Related
- Compassion fatigue impacted by traumatic birth and psychological resilience among midwives in mainland China: an explanatory sequential mixed-methods.
- Perceived factors influencing healthcare professionals’ adherence to the ABCDE approach: an exploratory explanatory sequential mixed-methods study
- Knowledge, perceptions, and associated factors of marburg virus disease in selected towns and districts of the South Ethiopia Region: an explanatory sequential mixed-methods study
- Understanding Black Women’s Lived Experiences of Medical Mistrust and Trust in the Reproductive Care Setting: a nested sequential explanatory mixed methods study
- Community Health Nurses’ Perceptions of Emerging Artificial Intelligence and its Impact on Nursing Practice: An Explanatory Sequential Mixed Methods Study
BibTeX
@article{moseray2026pervasive,
title = {{The pervasive socio-economic and psychological burden of onchocerciasis in endemic communities of Bo District, Sierra Leone: an explanatory sequential mixed-methods study.}},
author = {Augustine Bob Moseray and Alhaji Brima Gogra and Rashid Ansumana},
journal = {BMC public health},
year = {2026},
month = jul,
doi = {10.1186/s12889-026-28720-3},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42907833},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - The pervasive socio-economic and psychological burden of onchocerciasis in endemic communities of Bo District, Sierra Leone: an explanatory sequential mixed-methods study.
AU - Augustine Bob Moseray
AU - Alhaji Brima Gogra
AU - Rashid Ansumana
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/07/01
JO - BMC public health
DO - 10.1186/s12889-026-28720-3
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42907833
AB - Background Onchocerciasis (river blindness) persists in Bo District, Sierra Leone, despite decades of ivermectin-based mass drug administration (MDA). Programmatic efforts have prioritized parasitological and ocular outcomes, so the socio-economic and psychological burden of the disease within affected communities remains poorly quantified. We aimed to determine the magnitude, structure and distribution of this non-clinical burden.Methods We used an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design (QUAN → qual). In the quantitative phase, 1,500 adults across five endemic chiefdoms of Bo District (Bagbwe, Baoma, Gbo, Selenga, Tikonko) were surveyed using multistage cluster sampling. Socio-economic impact (range 0-2) and psychological impact (range 0-3) were each measured with a formative composite index summing binary items on economic hardship, education/employment obstacles, emotional well-being, social stigma, and self-esteem. Instruments were forward- and back-translated into Mende, pilot-tested (Cronbach's α = 0.76-0.81), and administered on Android tablets using ODK Collect. We used chi-square tests, one-way ANOVA, independent-samples t-tests and Spearman correlation in JASP (v0.18). Eleven key informant interviews and eight focus group discussions (five participants each, n = 40) were analysed thematically to explain the quantitative findings. Ethical approval was granted by the Njala University Institutional Review Board (NUIRB) on 14 April 2024.Results The burden was extensive: 71.7% (95% CI 69.4-74.0) of respondents reported economic hardship and 95.8% (95% CI 94.7-96.7) scored at least one psychological impact. The socio-economic and psychological indices were statistically independent (ρ = .026, p = .311) and did not differ significantly across chiefdoms (F(4,1495) = 1.91, p = .106), sexes (t(1498) = 0.26, p = .796), or age groups (F(2,1497) = 0.80, p = .451). Qualitative themes described a productivity-poverty cycle, stigma experienced as "social death," and an unrecognized gendered caregiving load.Conclusions Onchocerciasis imposes a pervasive, uniformly distributed dual burden in Bo District that is invisible to parasitological surveillance. Morbidity-management, stigma-reduction and psychosocial support should be delivered population-wide and integrated into primary healthcare and MDA delivery rather than targeted narrowly at demographic risk groups.
SN - 1471-2458
ER -