Testing and Diagnosing Parameter Miscalibration in Probabilistic Error Cancellation via Direct Fidelity Estimation
Abstract
Probabilistic Error Cancellation (PEC) is a standard technique for mitigating noise in quantum computations, but its unbiasedness relies on accurate knowledge of the underlying noise parameters. In practice, these parameters are inferred from experimental data and may be inaccurate. We introduce a protocol that tests PEC parameter consistency on hardware by applying Direct Fidelity Estimation (DFE) to the effective mitigated state. The resulting DFE overlap serves not only as a witness of parameter miscalibration but, under appropriate conditions, also reveals whether the PEC parameters have been overestimated or underestimated. We establish this behavior for arbitrary circuits under global depolarizing noise and for Clifford circuits under general Pauli-stochastic noise. For arbitrary circuits subject to Pauli-stochastic noise, the underestimation result holds generally, while the corresponding overestimation result is established perturbatively for sufficiently small consistent miscalibrations under an additional nondegeneracy condition. We further show that the purity of the effective mitigated operator provides a more general diagnostic, allowing the miscalibration direction to be identified for arbitrary circuits and arbitrary parameter deviations. Finally, we describe a two-copy PEC procedure for measuring this quantity and show that, together with the DFE overlap, it determines the Hilbert-Schmidt distance from the ideal state. The sampling overhead incurred by our protocol is the same as that of PEC, and we discuss strategies to improve it.
Related
- Probabilistic Error Cancellation for Single-Mode Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill Codes
- Zeno-Enhanced Probabilistic Error Cancellation with Quantum Error Detection Codes
- Gauge-parameter cancellation and finite form factors in one-loop quark scattering in the refined Gribov-Zwanziger framework
- Parameter Estimation for Eccentric Supermassive Black Hole Binaries with Pulsar Timing Arrays
- Selecting movements for muscle parameter estimation: insights from gradient analysis in trajectory optimization
BibTeX
@misc{sabater2026testing,
title = {{Testing and Diagnosing Parameter Miscalibration in Probabilistic Error Cancellation via Direct Fidelity Estimation}},
author = {Francesc Sabater and Tristan Kraft and Carlos A. Riofrío and Barbara Kraus},
howpublished = {arXiv},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.12802},
eprint = {2609.12802},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.12802},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Testing and Diagnosing Parameter Miscalibration in Probabilistic Error Cancellation via Direct Fidelity Estimation
AU - Francesc Sabater
AU - Tristan Kraft
AU - Carlos A. Riofrío
AU - Barbara Kraus
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/11
PB - arXiv
DO - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.12802
UR - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.12802
AB - Probabilistic Error Cancellation (PEC) is a standard technique for mitigating noise in quantum computations, but its unbiasedness relies on accurate knowledge of the underlying noise parameters. In practice, these parameters are inferred from experimental data and may be inaccurate. We introduce a protocol that tests PEC parameter consistency on hardware by applying Direct Fidelity Estimation (DFE) to the effective mitigated state. The resulting DFE overlap serves not only as a witness of parameter miscalibration but, under appropriate conditions, also reveals whether the PEC parameters have been overestimated or underestimated. We establish this behavior for arbitrary circuits under global depolarizing noise and for Clifford circuits under general Pauli-stochastic noise. For arbitrary circuits subject to Pauli-stochastic noise, the underestimation result holds generally, while the corresponding overestimation result is established perturbatively for sufficiently small consistent miscalibrations under an additional nondegeneracy condition. We further show that the purity of the effective mitigated operator provides a more general diagnostic, allowing the miscalibration direction to be identified for arbitrary circuits and arbitrary parameter deviations. Finally, we describe a two-copy PEC procedure for measuring this quantity and show that, together with the DFE overlap, it determines the Hilbert-Schmidt distance from the ideal state. The sampling overhead incurred by our protocol is the same as that of PEC, and we discuss strategies to improve it.
ER -