Comparative Effects of Different Carbohydrate–Protein Formulations on Resistance Training Adaptations in Healthy Young Men
5 affiliations
- 1China Basketball College, Beijing Sport University, Beijing 100084, China
- 2Department of Exercise Biochemistry, Exercise Science School, Beijing Sport University, Beijing 100084, China
- 3Beijing Competitor Sports Nutrition Research Institute, Beijing 100029, China
- 4School of Education, Beijing Sport University, Beijing 100084, China
- 5Beijing Sports Nutrition Engineering Research Center, Beijing 100084, China
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Evidence is limited on whether carbohydrate formulations enhance resistance training adaptations when protein intake is relatively adequate. This study compared two carbohydrate–protein formulations in healthy young men. Methods: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 36 untrained men aged 18–25 years were assigned to a maltodextrin-based carbohydrate control group (PLA), low-molecular-weight carbohydrate plus protein (LMW-CHO+PRO), or high-molecular-weight carbohydrate plus protein (HMW-CHO+PRO). Thirty-three participants completed 8 weeks of supervised resistance training three times weekly and daily supplementation (50 g). Body composition, muscle circumference and thickness, strength, and serum testosterone, cortisol, and testosterone-to-cortisol ratio were assessed before and after intervention. The trial was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2500110509). Results: Body mass, total muscle mass, muscle circumference and thickness, and strength improved in all groups. Both supplementation groups showed greater improvements than PLA across several muscular adaptation measures. Time × group interactions were significant for body mass and total muscle mass, but not fat mass. HMW-CHO+PRO produced greater increases in body mass and total muscle mass than LMW-CHO+PRO; however, no consistent differences between formulations were observed in regional muscle circumference, muscle thickness, strength, or blood biomarkers. Conclusions: Under conditions of relatively adequate protein intake, combined carbohydrate and protein supplementation may provide additional support for resistance training adaptations. These findings do not establish an overall advantage of either formulation, nor can the observed differences be attributed specifically to carbohydrate molecular weight.
Related
- Cross-species transcriptomic plasticity and root architectural adaptations in Brachypodium (Brachypodium distachyon) and barley (Hordeum vulgare) genotypes under different ammonium and nitrate availability
- Plant-oil-based adhesive formulations induce plant stress responses and enhance resistance of Chrysanthemum to western flower thrips.
- Bat genomes illuminate adaptations to viral tolerance and disease resistance
- Comparative assessment of phytoplankton community using different filtration methods based on environmental DNA metabarcoding—a case study of Caohai Wetland
- Distribution of target-site resistance mechanisms to nicosulfuron and glyphosate in Amaranthus palmeri accessions from two different regions of Turkiye
BibTeX
@article{liang2026comparative,
title = {{Comparative Effects of Different Carbohydrate–Protein Formulations on Resistance Training Adaptations in Healthy Young Men}},
author = {Wanyuan Liang and Xiang Wang and Congyu Sun and Yan Chen and Ye Sun and Dong Wang and Jingyi Zhang and Chengnan Zhang and Bing Wei and Junqiang Qiu},
journal = {Nutrients},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3390/nu18213513},
url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/18/21/3513},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Comparative Effects of Different Carbohydrate–Protein Formulations on Resistance Training Adaptations in Healthy Young Men
AU - Wanyuan Liang
AU - Xiang Wang
AU - Congyu Sun
AU - Yan Chen
AU - Ye Sun
AU - Dong Wang
AU - Jingyi Zhang
AU - Chengnan Zhang
AU - Bing Wei
AU - Junqiang Qiu
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/25
JO - Nutrients
DO - 10.3390/nu18213513
UR - https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/18/21/3513
AB - Background/Objectives: Evidence is limited on whether carbohydrate formulations enhance resistance training adaptations when protein intake is relatively adequate. This study compared two carbohydrate–protein formulations in healthy young men. Methods: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 36 untrained men aged 18–25 years were assigned to a maltodextrin-based carbohydrate control group (PLA), low-molecular-weight carbohydrate plus protein (LMW-CHO+PRO), or high-molecular-weight carbohydrate plus protein (HMW-CHO+PRO). Thirty-three participants completed 8 weeks of supervised resistance training three times weekly and daily supplementation (50 g). Body composition, muscle circumference and thickness, strength, and serum testosterone, cortisol, and testosterone-to-cortisol ratio were assessed before and after intervention. The trial was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2500110509). Results: Body mass, total muscle mass, muscle circumference and thickness, and strength improved in all groups. Both supplementation groups showed greater improvements than PLA across several muscular adaptation measures. Time × group interactions were significant for body mass and total muscle mass, but not fat mass. HMW-CHO+PRO produced greater increases in body mass and total muscle mass than LMW-CHO+PRO; however, no consistent differences between formulations were observed in regional muscle circumference, muscle thickness, strength, or blood biomarkers. Conclusions: Under conditions of relatively adequate protein intake, combined carbohydrate and protein supplementation may provide additional support for resistance training adaptations. These findings do not establish an overall advantage of either formulation, nor can the observed differences be attributed specifically to carbohydrate molecular weight.
SN - 2072-6643
ER -