Simple Extensions of Single-Objective Acquisition Functions and Hedge Strategies for Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimization
Abstract
Multi-objective Bayesian optimization (MOBO) is commonly approached through specialized acquisition functions or scalarization schemes designed to explicitly account for trade-offs among non-preferential objectives. In this work, we show that such complexity might be unnecessary. We propose a framework that extends standard single-objective acquisition functions directly to the multi-objective setting through a hypervolume-based transformation. We further extend hedge strategies for acquisition functions, which are typically used only in single-objective optimization, to the multi-objective regime. Our approach requires minimal modification to existing Bayesian optimization pipelines and avoids the need for bespoke multi-objective formulations. We demonstrate how a broad class of commonly used single-objective acquisition functions and hedge strategies can be adapted in a principled manner to handle multiple objectives, while preserving their intuitive interpretation and computational efficiency. Empirically, we evaluate the proposed methods across a range of synthetic and real-world multi-objective benchmarks. Despite their simplicity, our extensions consistently match or outperform more complex state-of-the-art MOBO methods in terms of optimization performance and sample efficiency. These results suggest that effective multi-objective Bayesian optimization can be achieved by reusing and carefully extending well-established single-objective acquisition strategies, offering a simpler and more flexible alternative to existing approaches.
Related
- A sequential quadratic programming method for optimization with expectation objective functions, deterministic inequality constraints and robust subproblems
- Synthesis of the Transient Behaviour of Optimization Algorithms for Strongly Convex Objective Functions
- Outperformance Inverse Optimization: Learning Objective Functions that Outperform Agent Decisions
- JAREX: An Acquisition Function for Multi-Objective Algorithmic Process Characterization
- A property of boundary extensions of atomic singular inner functions
BibTeX
@misc{sheikh2026simple,
title = {{Simple Extensions of Single-Objective Acquisition Functions and Hedge Strategies for Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimization}},
author = {Haris Moazam Sheikh},
howpublished = {arXiv},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.31940},
eprint = {2609.31940},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.31940},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Simple Extensions of Single-Objective Acquisition Functions and Hedge Strategies for Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimization
AU - Haris Moazam Sheikh
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/25
PB - arXiv
DO - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.31940
UR - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.31940
AB - Multi-objective Bayesian optimization (MOBO) is commonly approached through specialized acquisition functions or scalarization schemes designed to explicitly account for trade-offs among non-preferential objectives. In this work, we show that such complexity might be unnecessary. We propose a framework that extends standard single-objective acquisition functions directly to the multi-objective setting through a hypervolume-based transformation. We further extend hedge strategies for acquisition functions, which are typically used only in single-objective optimization, to the multi-objective regime. Our approach requires minimal modification to existing Bayesian optimization pipelines and avoids the need for bespoke multi-objective formulations. We demonstrate how a broad class of commonly used single-objective acquisition functions and hedge strategies can be adapted in a principled manner to handle multiple objectives, while preserving their intuitive interpretation and computational efficiency. Empirically, we evaluate the proposed methods across a range of synthetic and real-world multi-objective benchmarks. Despite their simplicity, our extensions consistently match or outperform more complex state-of-the-art MOBO methods in terms of optimization performance and sample efficiency. These results suggest that effective multi-objective Bayesian optimization can be achieved by reusing and carefully extending well-established single-objective acquisition strategies, offering a simpler and more flexible alternative to existing approaches.
ER -