Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 47 min ago
PreprintCC BYChemRxiv

Observation-Guided Computation: Sequential Reobservation for Robust Chromatographic Peak Detection

  1. 1Nanyang Technological University
  2. 2Shimadzu Asia Pacific
  3. 3ChemoPower Technology Pte Ltd

Abstract

Chromatographic peak detection is the bottom-most step of the data-processing chain, yet almost every classical detector defines its decision variables in units of signal amplitude, so those variables co-vary with baseline drift, injection amount, and detector gain, and a single-pass decision is made once against an unchanged trace. We reframe detection not as a better criterion but as a change in the computational organization of observation, and we do so in three ordered layers. Layer 1 — Observation-Guided Computation (OGC) is a sequential computational framework — an analytical data-interpretation principle rather than a new peak detector — built around the Observation Deviation (OD) measure established in our companion work13. OGC does not introduce another peak criterion or redefine OD; it embeds OD as an observation measure into an observe–detect–reconstruct–flatten–reobserve loop, so the observation condition is updated after each detected structure. Within a working window the trace is normalized to a unitless observation space, scored by OD against a single dimensionless threshold, and all final boundaries are re-anchored on the raw signal. OGC is deliberately independent of any particular candidate generator: it can be composed from any apex finder, and six heterogeneous engines all converge to a common performance plateau. Under one frozen configuration OGC reaches interval-coverage F1 = 1.000 on three of four synthetic benchmark sets with zero false positives, converts six heterogeneous apex-finder engines into region locators that all converge to F1 ≈ 1.000 (lifting bare derivative and moving-average detectors, unusable at F1 ≤ 0.090, by up to +0.967), is invariant to four orders of magnitude of dynamic range, and identifies high-confidence observable structures on two real GC–MS chromatograms where no global prominence fraction could serve both. Layer 2 — OGC-Net asks whether the representation of chemical observation can itself be learned: it algorithm-unrolls OGC's recursive loop into a differentiable K = 5-round network of 160,516 parameters. It runs a 150-point segment in 13.9 ms (batch 1) to 0.92 ms (batch 128) on CPU and, evaluated under the identical matching protocol, beats the frozen deterministic OGC by +0.116 peak-level F1 precisely on the harder, deployment-identical windowed distribution (0.6944 vs 0.5782). Layer 3 — OGC-Web delivers OGC-Net as a single offline, zero-backend HTML file whose forward pass is a pure-JavaScript port with base64-embedded weights, reproducing the peak-level agreement with the OGC reference client-side. Our central message is that chromatographic observation can be quantified and computationally organized as a sequential process, and that learning the framework — not fitting output labels — is the stronger objective when a deterministic gold-standard algorithm already exists.

Related

  1. A Luminescent Pt-NCN Complex Anchored onto a Polyethylene Film for Sequential Detection of Iodide and Mercury
    Josue Valdes-García, Mireille Vonlanthen, Fabián Cuétara-Guadarrama +7
    ACS omegaPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral chemistryEurope PMC
  2. Extraction of some pesticides from grape juice samples using an amide-based polymer as a sorbent followed by gas chromatographic determination
    Fatemeh Ershad, Mir Ali Farajzadeh, Sina Mohammad Mehri +1
    RSC advancesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral chemistryEurope PMC
  3. Guiding chromatographic purification through data-driven condition recommendations
    Yuki Murakami, Nobuo Cho, Kosei Egami +8
    ChemRxivPreprintCC BYFull textMaterials & polymersChemRxiv
  4. Application of Hansen Solubility Parameters for Green Solvent Extraction of Flavonoids from Oroxylum indicum (L.) Kurz and Chromatographic Profiling Across Plant Organs
    Prommin Suphanakron, Rutchaphol Sookjitt, Wullapa Jittachai +2
    MoleculesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Analytical chemistryCrossref
  5. Chromatographic Peak Shape beyond the High-Péclet Approximation: Analytic Time-Domain Expression and Derivatives
    Hernán R. Sánchez
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textPhysical chemistryarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{xi2026observationguided,
  title = {{Observation-Guided Computation: Sequential Reobservation for Robust Chromatographic Peak Detection}},
  author = {Zhang Zhi Xi and Chua Chun Kiang and Hua-Jun Zhang},
  howpublished = {ChemRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.26434/chemrxiv.15008492/v1},
  url = {https://chemrxiv.org/doi/full/10.26434/chemrxiv.15008492/v1},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Observation-Guided Computation: Sequential Reobservation for Robust Chromatographic Peak Detection
AU  - Zhang Zhi Xi
AU  - Chua Chun Kiang
AU  - Hua-Jun Zhang
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/08
PB  - ChemRxiv
DO  - 10.26434/chemrxiv.15008492/v1
UR  - https://chemrxiv.org/doi/full/10.26434/chemrxiv.15008492/v1
AB  - Chromatographic peak detection is the bottom-most step of the data-processing chain, yet almost every classical detector defines its decision variables in units of signal amplitude, so those variables co-vary with baseline drift, injection amount, and detector gain, and a single-pass decision is made once against an unchanged trace. We reframe detection not as a better criterion but as a change in the computational organization of observation, and we do so in three ordered layers. Layer 1 — Observation-Guided Computation (OGC) is a sequential computational framework — an analytical data-interpretation principle rather than a new peak detector — built around the Observation Deviation (OD) measure established in our companion work13. OGC does not introduce another peak criterion or redefine OD; it embeds OD as an observation measure into an observe–detect–reconstruct–flatten–reobserve loop, so the observation condition is updated after each detected structure. Within a working window the trace is normalized to a unitless observation space, scored by OD against a single dimensionless threshold, and all final boundaries are re-anchored on the raw signal. OGC is deliberately independent of any particular candidate generator: it can be composed from any apex finder, and six heterogeneous engines all converge to a common performance plateau. Under one frozen configuration OGC reaches interval-coverage F1 = 1.000 on three of four synthetic benchmark sets with zero false positives, converts six heterogeneous apex-finder engines into region locators that all converge to F1 ≈ 1.000 (lifting bare derivative and moving-average detectors, unusable at F1 ≤ 0.090, by up to +0.967), is invariant to four orders of magnitude of dynamic range, and identifies high-confidence observable structures on two real GC–MS chromatograms where no global prominence fraction could serve both. Layer 2 — OGC-Net asks whether the representation of chemical observation can itself be learned: it algorithm-unrolls OGC's recursive loop into a differentiable K = 5-round network of 160,516 parameters. It runs a 150-point segment in 13.9 ms (batch 1) to 0.92 ms (batch 128) on CPU and, evaluated under the identical matching protocol, beats the frozen deterministic OGC by +0.116 peak-level F1 precisely on the harder, deployment-identical windowed distribution (0.6944 vs 0.5782). Layer 3 — OGC-Web delivers OGC-Net as a single offline, zero-backend HTML file whose forward pass is a pure-JavaScript port with base64-embedded weights, reproducing the peak-level agreement with the OGC reference client-side. Our central message is that chromatographic observation can be quantified and computationally organized as a sequential process, and that learning the framework — not fitting output labels — is the stronger objective when a deterministic gold-standard algorithm already exists.
ER  -