Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 35 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Joint Mass-Radius and Magnetic-Geometry Inference of PSR J0740+6620

Abstract

X-ray pulse-profile modeling can measure neutron-star radii, but its physical interpretation remains limited by the largely phenomenological description of the surface hotspots. Here we connect the X-ray hotspots directly to the pulsar magnetospheric structure and jointly infer the mass, radius, and magnetic geometry of the massive millisecond pulsar PSR J0740+6620 from \emph{NICER} and \emph{XMM-Newton} observations. Using a GPU-accelerated implementation, we compare two low-dimensional magnetic configurations that can produce non-antipodal emission: a centered axisymmetric dipole--quadrupole and a shifted dipole. The shifted-dipole model is decisively favored under the adopted priors, with Δln Z=5.65 (Bayes factor ∼285), and yields M=2.059+0.068−0.069 M⊙ and R=13.28+1.47−1.07 km, broadly consistent with previous phenomenological analyses, while requiring nearly symmetric heating of the two polar caps. Both the marginalized shifted-dipole posterior and the timing-compatible representative require an effective X-ray-emitting footprint much smaller than the nominal force-free polar cap calibrated for a centered dipole. This compact footprint is not reproduced by our exploratory photon-conversion estimates and instead points to missing physics in the mapping from magnetospheric currents to observable X-ray emission. Our results show that physically motivated hotspots can preserve the mass--radius inference while turning hotspot morphology into a probe of pulsar magnetospheric structure and emission physics.

Related

  1. Systematic Effects of Hydrogen and Helium Atmosphere Mismatch on Radius Inference in PSR J0740+6620–like Synthetic NICER Data
    Isiah M. Holt, M. Coleman Miller, Alexander J. Dittmann +1
    The Astrophysical JournalPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textHigh-energy astrophysicsCrossref
  2. Systematic Effects of Hydrogen and Helium Atmosphere Mismatch on Radius Inference in PSR~J0740+6620-like Synthetic NICER Data
    Isiah M. Holt, M. Coleman Miller, Alexander J. Dittmann +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textHigh-energy astrophysicsInstrumentation & methodsarXiv
  3. A Missing Latent, Not a Missing Simulator: Radius-Augmented Inference for Real JWST Retrieval
    Angshuman Chakravertty, P V V Raj
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textInstrumentation & methodsPlanetary science & exoplanetsarXiv
  4. Dark Energy Constraints and Joint Cosmological Inference from Mutually Inconsistent Observations
    Charles L Steinhardt, Preston Phillips, Radoslaw Wojtak
    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textCosmologyCrossref
  5. Hierarchical Inference of the Supermassive Black Hole Binary Merger Rates from Joint Searches using Pulsar Timing Arrays
    Sharon Mary Tomson, Rutger van Haasteren, Boris Goncharov
    arXivPreprintCC0Full textHigh-energy astrophysicsInstrumentation & methodsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{huang2026joint,
  title = {{Joint Mass-Radius and Magnetic-Geometry Inference of PSR J0740+6620}},
  author = {Chun Huang and Tuomo Salmi and Alexander Y. Chen},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.37928},
  eprint = {2609.37928},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.37928},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Joint Mass-Radius and Magnetic-Geometry Inference of PSR J0740+6620
AU  - Chun Huang
AU  - Tuomo Salmi
AU  - Alexander Y. Chen
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/29
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.37928
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.37928
AB  - X-ray pulse-profile modeling can measure neutron-star radii, but its physical interpretation remains limited by the largely phenomenological description of the surface hotspots. Here we connect the X-ray hotspots directly to the pulsar magnetospheric structure and jointly infer the mass, radius, and magnetic geometry of the massive millisecond pulsar PSR J0740+6620 from \emph{NICER} and \emph{XMM-Newton} observations. Using a GPU-accelerated implementation, we compare two low-dimensional magnetic configurations that can produce non-antipodal emission: a centered axisymmetric dipole--quadrupole and a shifted dipole. The shifted-dipole model is decisively favored under the adopted priors, with Δln Z=5.65 (Bayes factor ∼285), and yields M=2.059^+0.068_−0.069 M_⊙ and R=13.28^+1.47_−1.07 km, broadly consistent with previous phenomenological analyses, while requiring nearly symmetric heating of the two polar caps. Both the marginalized shifted-dipole posterior and the timing-compatible representative require an effective X-ray-emitting footprint much smaller than the nominal force-free polar cap calibrated for a centered dipole. This compact footprint is not reproduced by our exploratory photon-conversion estimates and instead points to missing physics in the mapping from magnetospheric currents to observable X-ray emission. Our results show that physically motivated hotspots can preserve the mass--radius inference while turning hotspot morphology into a probe of pulsar magnetospheric structure and emission physics.
ER  -