Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,761 studies31 sourcesUpdated 10 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Mathematics

PAIR: Conditional Support Repair of Square-Root Allocations Under Fixed Data Budgets

  1. 1The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Türkiye (TÜBİTAK), Informatics and Information Security Research Center (BİLGEM), 41470 Gebze, Kocaeli, Türkiye
  2. 2Software Engineering Department, Kocaeli University, Umuttepe, 41001 Izmit, Kocaeli, Türkiye

Abstract

Downsampling an imbalanced training set to a fixed data budget requires deciding how many observations each class retains. Under aggressive compression, even Square-Root allocation can leave rare classes with only a few training observations. We introduce PAIR (Pair-Capacity Adaptive Intervention and Repair), a conditional support-repair operator that keeps capacity-aware Square-Root allocation as the parent solution. PAIR raises a structural-tail quota only when it falls below a K-dependent floor, optionally strengthened by a training-only representation criterion, and then restores the exact budget by minimum-divergence repair; otherwise, it returns the Square-Root quotas and sampled rows exactly. On NF-ToN-IoT, UNSW-NB15, and CICIDS2017 with budgets of 1000–5000, PAIR is active in four of nine settings and identical to Square-Root in the other five. Held-out Macro-F1 rises from 0.5227 to 0.5466 on NF-ToN-IoT at B=1000, where fixed Power is higher (0.5519), and from 0.6363, 0.6788, and 0.7626 to 0.6714, 0.7726, and 0.7945 on CICIDS2017, the highest of seven compared methods. PAIR exceeds Square-Root in 39 of 40 active repeated development-split comparisons, and a synthetic study confirms the closed-form activation condition. The CICIDS2017 gains concentrate in classes with two to seven held-out observations, while Accuracy and Weighted-F1 change by less than 0.002, indicating rare-event recovery.

Related

  1. Optimal support and condensation in random allocations
    Andrea Ottolini
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textProbabilityarXiv
  2. A prime plus a square: A conditional 11/20 upper bound
    János Pintz, Ingo Althöfer
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAlgebra & number theoryarXiv
  3. Envy-Free Allocations for Random Non-Additive Valuations
    Pasin Manurangsi
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsarXiv
  4. Monotone Allocations without Single-Crossing: When to Bunch and When to Jump
    Aloisio Araujo, Carolina Parra, Sergei Vieira
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  5. Probability of Quota Violations in Divisor Apportionment Methods with Nonzero Allocations
    Tyler C. Wunder, Joseph Cutrone
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textProbabilityarXiv
BibTeX
@article{kul2026pair,
  title = {{PAIR: Conditional Support Repair of Square-Root Allocations Under Fixed Data Budgets}},
  author = {Seda Kul and Mehmet Zeki Konyar and Kaplan Kaplan and Kerem Küçük},
  journal = {Mathematics},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.3390/math14213988},
  url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/14/21/3988},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - PAIR: Conditional Support Repair of Square-Root Allocations Under Fixed Data Budgets
AU  - Seda Kul
AU  - Mehmet Zeki Konyar
AU  - Kaplan Kaplan
AU  - Kerem Küçük
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/02
JO  - Mathematics
DO  - 10.3390/math14213988
UR  - https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/14/21/3988
AB  - Downsampling an imbalanced training set to a fixed data budget requires deciding how many observations each class retains. Under aggressive compression, even Square-Root allocation can leave rare classes with only a few training observations. We introduce PAIR (Pair-Capacity Adaptive Intervention and Repair), a conditional support-repair operator that keeps capacity-aware Square-Root allocation as the parent solution. PAIR raises a structural-tail quota only when it falls below a K-dependent floor, optionally strengthened by a training-only representation criterion, and then restores the exact budget by minimum-divergence repair; otherwise, it returns the Square-Root quotas and sampled rows exactly. On NF-ToN-IoT, UNSW-NB15, and CICIDS2017 with budgets of 1000–5000, PAIR is active in four of nine settings and identical to Square-Root in the other five. Held-out Macro-F1 rises from 0.5227 to 0.5466 on NF-ToN-IoT at B=1000, where fixed Power is higher (0.5519), and from 0.6363, 0.6788, and 0.7626 to 0.6714, 0.7726, and 0.7945 on CICIDS2017, the highest of seven compared methods. PAIR exceeds Square-Root in 39 of 40 active repeated development-split comparisons, and a synthetic study confirms the closed-form activation condition. The CICIDS2017 gains concentrate in classes with two to seven held-out observations, while Accuracy and Weighted-F1 change by less than 0.002, indicating rare-event recovery.
SN  - 2227-7390
ER  -