Low-Redshift Interlopers in the SDSS DR16 z > 5 Quasar Catalogue

Abstract

High-redshift quasars (z>5) are crucial for studying early black hole growth and reionisation. SDSS Data Release 16 catalogues 655 such sources with multiple redshift estimators. We systematically examined this subsample and found 480 sources (73.2\%) where pipeline redshift (Z\_DR16Q) disagrees with the derived estimate (Z\_FIT) significantly. Visual inspection confirms that 125 of these (19.1\% of the total) are actually low-redshift active galactic nuclei. In 114 cases, broad Mg\,{\sc ii} with C\,{\sc iii} and C\,{\sc iv} was misidentified as Lyα; in 11 cases, Hα was misidentified as Lyα. This error is immediately revealed by the absence of Gunn--Peterson trough blueward of Lyα. Crucially, Z\_FIT recovers correct redshift in the affected sources where emission lines are prominent, indicating the algorithm is sound; the issue lies in community preference for Z\_DR16Q or Z\_SPEC. We urge caution against uncritical use of pipeline redshifts for z>5 DR16Q sources and recommend Z\_FIT as the preferred estimator.

Ghostly DLAs in SDSS DR16
Patrick Petitjean
arXiv15 Aug 2026PreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGalaxiesarXiv
An Exploratory Analysis of New Large Gaia-informed Quasar Samples in SDSS-V
Shir Aviram, Benny Trakhtenbrot, Tom Dwelly +22
The Astrophysical Journal19 Oct 2026Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGalaxiesCrossref
A tidal disruption event in a quasar at redshift 7.19
S. Fujimoto, Q. Fei, G. B. Brammer +41
arXiv24 Sep 2026PreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGalaxies High-energy astrophysicsarXiv
JWST lensed quasar dark matter survey. IV. Stringent warm dark matter constraints from the joint reconstruction of extended lensed arcs and quasar flux ratios
Daniel Gilman, Anna M Nierenberg, Tommaso Treu +23
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.2 Jun 2026Peer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text23 citedGalaxiesOpenAlex
The quasar main sequence of highly accreting NLSy1 galaxies
Alberto Domínguez, Suvendu Rakshit, Vaidehi S. Paliya +2
Astronomy & Astrophysics5 Nov 2026Peer-reviewedPublisher termsSolar & stellar physicsCrossref

Cite

BibTeX RIS

BibTeX

@misc{jha2026lowredshift,
  title = {{Low-Redshift Interlopers in the SDSS DR16 $z > 5$ Quasar Catalogue}},
  author = {Vivek Kumar Jha and Harikumar N and Yogesh Wadadekar},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.08290},
  eprint = {2609.08290},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.08290},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}

RIS

TY  - UNPB
TI  - Low-Redshift Interlopers in the SDSS DR16 z > 5 Quasar Catalogue
AU  - Vivek Kumar Jha
AU  - Harikumar N
AU  - Yogesh Wadadekar
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/08
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.08290
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.08290
AB  - High-redshift quasars (z>5) are crucial for studying early black hole growth and reionisation. SDSS Data Release 16 catalogues 655 such sources with multiple redshift estimators. We systematically examined this subsample and found 480 sources (73.2\%) where pipeline redshift (Z\_DR16Q) disagrees with the derived estimate (Z\_FIT) significantly. Visual inspection confirms that 125 of these (19.1\% of the total) are actually low-redshift active galactic nuclei. In 114 cases, broad Mg\,{\sc ii} with C\,{\sc iii} and C\,{\sc iv} was misidentified as Lyα; in 11 cases, Hα was misidentified as Lyα. This error is immediately revealed by the absence of Gunn--Peterson trough blueward of Lyα. Crucially, Z\_FIT recovers correct redshift in the affected sources where emission lines are prominent, indicating the algorithm is sound; the issue lies in community preference for Z\_DR16Q or Z\_SPEC. We urge caution against uncritical use of pipeline redshifts for z>5 DR16Q sources and recommend Z\_FIT as the preferred estimator.
ER  -

Abstract

Related

Cite