Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
190,851 studies31 sourcesUpdated 4 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYWaste Management Bulletin

Circular economy for municipal solid waste: A systematic review on resource management, recycling, and recovery

  1. 1Division of Energy Systems, Department of Energy Technology, School of Industrial Engineering and Management, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Brinellvägen 68, SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden

Abstract

Municipal solid waste management (MSWM) is a central urban sustainability challenge, particularly in lower-income contexts where increasing waste volumes coincide with limited infrastructure, environmental pressures, public health risks, and social constraints. Yet municipal solid waste (MSW) is also a resource stream. Through thermal, hydrothermal, and biological treatment, MSW can be converted into energy, nutrients, and value-added materials while reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and diverting waste from landfills. Resource recovery and recycling extend the function of MSWM beyond collection and disposal, enabling materials, energy, and nutrients to be recaptured in line with circular economy (CE) principles and the sustainable development goals (SDGs). However, selecting suitable treatment options remains difficult because assessments often apply inconsistent criteria and insufficiently account for feedstock variability, local management conditions, and environmental, economic, and social trade-offs. This review synthesizes global advances in MSW-to-resource technologies and develops an integrated comparison of thermal, hydrothermal, and biological processes. The assessment links process suitability and technology readiness with MSW characteristics, economic viability, environmental impact, air pollution risks, and social acceptance. Advanced thermal processes can achieve electricity recovery of 544–816 kWh per tonne of MSW and reduce waste mass by 80–90%. Biological processes may offer stronger economic and environmental benefits, higher community acceptance, and greater technology readiness where organic waste streams are suitable. Together, these findings identify source segregation, revenue generation, public-private partnerships, public awareness and education, and carbon capture and storage as key enablers for aligning MSWM technology choices with CE objectives and local implementation conditions.

Related

  1. From process simulation to circular value: environmental-economic assessment of advanced recycling for end-of-life photovoltaics
    Shiyu Wang, Yi Peng, Y J Zhao +8
    Sustainable Production and ConsumptionPeer-reviewedLicence not stated5 citedEnvironmental science & pollutionOpenAlex
  2. Assessing the impacts of solid waste management in the context of corporate social responsibility and the circular economy
    Sobia Iqbal, Manzoor Ahmed Sanjrani, Kamran Khan +3
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textEnvironmental science & pollutionCrossref
  3. Water management and the circular economy: a critical analysis of the emergence of a dominant paradigm
    Noémie Neverre, Nassim Ait-Mouheb, Jean-Christophe Maréchal +2
    International Journal of Water Resources DevelopmentPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textHydrology & soilsHAL
  4. Comparative evaluation of four household food‑waste composting systems for decentralized circular waste management.
    Stanislava Voběrková, Eva Jansová, Martina Vršanská +7
    Environmental science and pollution research internationalPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textHydrology & soilsEurope PMC
  5. Towards a circular business ecosystem 4.0 in the cosmetics industry: Findings from a bibliometric analysis and systematic literature review
    André Nana, Ransome Bawack, Gwenola Yannou-Le Bris +1
    Journal of Cleaner ProductionPeer-reviewedPublisher termsFull text7 citedEnvironmental science & pollutionHAL
BibTeX
@article{gajera2026circular,
  title = {{Circular economy for municipal solid waste: A systematic review on resource management, recycling, and recovery}},
  author = {Rutuben Gajera and Maryna Henrysson and Dilip Khatiwada},
  journal = {Waste Management Bulletin},
  year = {2026},
  month = jun,
  doi = {10.1016/j.wmb.2026.100333},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wmb.2026.100333},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Circular economy for municipal solid waste: A systematic review on resource management, recycling, and recovery
AU  - Rutuben Gajera
AU  - Maryna Henrysson
AU  - Dilip Khatiwada
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/06/22
JO  - Waste Management Bulletin
DO  - 10.1016/j.wmb.2026.100333
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wmb.2026.100333
AB  - Municipal solid waste management (MSWM) is a central urban sustainability challenge, particularly in lower-income contexts where increasing waste volumes coincide with limited infrastructure, environmental pressures, public health risks, and social constraints. Yet municipal solid waste (MSW) is also a resource stream. Through thermal, hydrothermal, and biological treatment, MSW can be converted into energy, nutrients, and value-added materials while reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and diverting waste from landfills. Resource recovery and recycling extend the function of MSWM beyond collection and disposal, enabling materials, energy, and nutrients to be recaptured in line with circular economy (CE) principles and the sustainable development goals (SDGs). However, selecting suitable treatment options remains difficult because assessments often apply inconsistent criteria and insufficiently account for feedstock variability, local management conditions, and environmental, economic, and social trade-offs. This review synthesizes global advances in MSW-to-resource technologies and develops an integrated comparison of thermal, hydrothermal, and biological processes. The assessment links process suitability and technology readiness with MSW characteristics, economic viability, environmental impact, air pollution risks, and social acceptance. Advanced thermal processes can achieve electricity recovery of 544–816 kWh per tonne of MSW and reduce waste mass by 80–90%. Biological processes may offer stronger economic and environmental benefits, higher community acceptance, and greater technology readiness where organic waste streams are suitable. Together, these findings identify source segregation, revenue generation, public-private partnerships, public awareness and education, and carbon capture and storage as key enablers for aligning MSWM technology choices with CE objectives and local implementation conditions.
SN  - 2949-7507
ER  -