Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
220,430 studies31 sourcesUpdated 46 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Frontiers in Psychiatry

Longitudinal interaction between emotional regulation difficulties and psychological distress in stroke patients and their spouses during rehabilitation and nursing implications

  1. 1Neurosurgery, Shaoxing People’s Hospital

Abstract

Objective: This longitudinal study examined the dynamic interaction between emotion regulation difficulties and psychological distress in stroke rehabilitation patients and their spouses using the Actor-Partner Interdependence Model (APIM).

Methods: Between June 2023 and June 2025, 394 patient-spouse dyads were recruited from the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine at Shaoxing People’s Hospital using cluster sampling. A six-month longitudinal investigation was conducted across three phases: pre-rehabilitation (T1), early rehabilitation (T2), and rehabilitation maintenance (T3). The Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale and Distress Thermometer were administered at each timepoint. Statistical analyses included measurement invariance testing and cross-lagged APIM analysis.

Results: Of 394 eligible couples, 386 completed all three surveys. Measurement invariance was established across timepoints (ΔCFI ≤ 0.01). Significant actor effects revealed bidirectional within-individual relationships: patients’ and spouses’ emotion dysregulation positively predicted their subsequent psychological distress (T1→T2: β = 0.19–0.21; T2→T3: β = 0.17–0.18; all p < 0.01). Conversely, psychological distress in both partners predicted later emotion dysregulation (T1→T2: β = 0.21–0.24, p < 0.001; T2→T3: β = 0.19–0.20, p < 0.01). Significant partner effects indicated inter-dyad transmission of psychological distress over time.

Conclusion: These findings demonstrate reciprocal longitudinal associations between emotion dysregulation and psychological distress within individuals and between partners. Healthcare providers should prioritize simultaneous dyadic screening, and future studies should test whether family-centered interventions can interrupt these reciprocal patterns and reduce distress in both patients and caregivers.

Related

  1. A longitudinal study on the developmental trajectory and interaction between learned helplessness and adherence with rehabilitation exercises in hemiplegic patients following a stroke
    Xiaoyan Sheng, Li Feng, Zheng Jiang +1
    Frontiers in NeurologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0NeurologyCrossref
  2. Maternal bonding difficulties and postpartum depression in pediatric clinical practice: a longitudinal study in a Japanese cohort
    Tomomi Yasaka, Takashi X. Fujisawa, Akemi Tomoda
    Frontiers in psychiatryPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textPsychiatry & mental healthEurope PMC
  3. Emotion Regulation Difficulties and Rumination as Serial Mediators in the Relationship Between Psychological Resilience and Loneliness
    Zeynep Erdoğan Yıldırım
    Psikiyatride Güncel YaklaşımlarPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textPsychiatry & mental healthDOAJ
  4. The Combined Efficacy of Adjunctive Psychological Interventions and Pulmonary Rehabilitation in People With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Chi-Ching Cheung, Gar-Lee Ng, Tsz-Shan Li +8
    Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases: Journal of the COPD FoundationPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textGeneral medicinePMC
  5. Joint trajectories of episodic memory and mobility difficulties in older adults in China and the United States: a longitudinal cohort study
    Ying Liu, Shao Yin, Yusheng Li +1
    Frontiers in Aging NeurosciencePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineDOAJ
BibTeX
@article{li2026longitudinal,
  title = {{Longitudinal interaction between emotional regulation difficulties and psychological distress in stroke patients and their spouses during rehabilitation and nursing implications}},
  author = {Fei Li and Yadi Mao and Chunmin Huang},
  journal = {Frontiers in Psychiatry},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1967501},
  url = {https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1967501/full},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Longitudinal interaction between emotional regulation difficulties and psychological distress in stroke patients and their spouses during rehabilitation and nursing implications
AU  - Fei Li
AU  - Yadi Mao
AU  - Chunmin Huang
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/11
JO  - Frontiers in Psychiatry
DO  - 10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1967501
UR  - https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1967501/full
AB  - Objective: This longitudinal study examined the dynamic interaction between emotion regulation difficulties and psychological distress in stroke rehabilitation patients and their spouses using the Actor-Partner Interdependence Model (APIM).  Methods: Between June 2023 and June 2025, 394 patient-spouse dyads were recruited from the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine at Shaoxing People’s Hospital using cluster sampling. A six-month longitudinal investigation was conducted across three phases: pre-rehabilitation (T1), early rehabilitation (T2), and rehabilitation maintenance (T3). The Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale and Distress Thermometer were administered at each timepoint. Statistical analyses included measurement invariance testing and cross-lagged APIM analysis.  Results: Of 394 eligible couples, 386 completed all three surveys. Measurement invariance was established across timepoints (ΔCFI ≤ 0.01). Significant actor effects revealed bidirectional within-individual relationships: patients’ and spouses’ emotion dysregulation positively predicted their subsequent psychological distress (T1→T2: β = 0.19–0.21; T2→T3: β = 0.17–0.18; all p < 0.01). Conversely, psychological distress in both partners predicted later emotion dysregulation (T1→T2: β = 0.21–0.24, p < 0.001; T2→T3: β = 0.19–0.20, p < 0.01). Significant partner effects indicated inter-dyad transmission of psychological distress over time.  Conclusion: These findings demonstrate reciprocal longitudinal associations between emotion dysregulation and psychological distress within individuals and between partners. Healthcare providers should prioritize simultaneous dyadic screening, and future studies should test whether family-centered interventions can interrupt these reciprocal patterns and reduce distress in both patients and caregivers.
SN  - 1664-0640
ER  -