Feedstock-Informed Technology Selection for Chemical Recycling of Plastic Rejects: An Integrated Physicochemical Characterization and Multi-Criteria Decision Framework
- 1Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Ardhi University, Dar es Salaam P.O. Box 35176, Tanzania
- 2Institute of Human Settlements Studies, Ardhi University, Dar es Salaam P.O. Box 35176, Tanzania
- 3Libe Green Innovation, Dar es Salaam P.O. Box 13027, Tanzania
Abstract
Rapid urbanization in the Global South has intensified plastic waste management challenges, and limited empirical data on plastic waste characteristics continue to hinder the adoption of appropriate recovery technologies in Africa. This study characterized non-recyclable plastic rejects from the Libegreen Innovation Material Recovery Facility (MRF) in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, and evaluated suitable chemical recycling pathways. An integrated analytical approach combining material flow analysis, Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), proximate and ultimate analysis, calorific value determination, X-ray fluorescence (XRF), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was used to determine the physicochemical and thermal properties. A hybrid Analytic Hierarchy Process and Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (AHP-TOPSIS) multi-criteria decision framework was used to compare pyrolysis, gasification, and depolymerization technologies. The results showed that the Material Recovery Facility achieved a high material recovery efficiency of 95.5%, with only 4.5% (181 tons/year) rejected, resulted in an estimated annual economic loss of USD 34,774–62,632. The rejects were dominated by polypropylene (51.58%), polyethylene terephthalate (28.42%), and polyvinyl chloride (20%). Polypropylene exhibited the highest energy recovery potential (28.82 MJ/kg HHV), whereas polyvinyl chloride presented processing challenges due to high chlorine content (36.7 wt%) and dehydrochlorination at approximately 280 °C. AHP-TOPSIS ranked gasification as the most suitable pathway (Ri = 0.718), followed by pyrolysis (Ri = 0.517) and then depolymerization (Ri = 0.196). These findings provide empirical evidence for advancing chemical recycling strategies and transforming plastic rejects into valuable resources within emerging circular economies.
Related
- Integrated media filtration and membrane bioreactor technology for sustainable domestic wastewater treatment
- Microstructural and physicochemical characterization, mechanical and durability performance with statistical evaluation of montmorillonite-impregnated burnt red soil bricks incorporating pyrolyzed coffee and tobacco biochars
- Conditional Climate–Cost Trade-Offs and Transport Break-Even Conditions for Waste Flexible-Film Recycling Under Feedstock Quality Constraints
- A multivariate integrated drought characterization framework using GNSS-GRACE terrestrial water storage and precipitation
- A novel integrated workflow for deep geothermal reservoir characterization using core data, optimized coupled petrophysical–seismic modeling, and machine learning: A case study from the SW Paris Basin, France
BibTeX
@article{mtabazi2026feedstockinformed,
title = {{Feedstock-Informed Technology Selection for Chemical Recycling of Plastic Rejects: An Integrated Physicochemical Characterization and Multi-Criteria Decision Framework}},
author = {Joseph F. Mtabazi and Jacob M. Kihila and Minza I. Selele and Liberatha Kawamala},
journal = {Polymers},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3390/polym18212628},
url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/18/21/2628},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Feedstock-Informed Technology Selection for Chemical Recycling of Plastic Rejects: An Integrated Physicochemical Characterization and Multi-Criteria Decision Framework
AU - Joseph F. Mtabazi
AU - Jacob M. Kihila
AU - Minza I. Selele
AU - Liberatha Kawamala
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/23
JO - Polymers
DO - 10.3390/polym18212628
UR - https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/18/21/2628
AB - Rapid urbanization in the Global South has intensified plastic waste management challenges, and limited empirical data on plastic waste characteristics continue to hinder the adoption of appropriate recovery technologies in Africa. This study characterized non-recyclable plastic rejects from the Libegreen Innovation Material Recovery Facility (MRF) in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, and evaluated suitable chemical recycling pathways. An integrated analytical approach combining material flow analysis, Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), proximate and ultimate analysis, calorific value determination, X-ray fluorescence (XRF), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was used to determine the physicochemical and thermal properties. A hybrid Analytic Hierarchy Process and Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (AHP-TOPSIS) multi-criteria decision framework was used to compare pyrolysis, gasification, and depolymerization technologies. The results showed that the Material Recovery Facility achieved a high material recovery efficiency of 95.5%, with only 4.5% (181 tons/year) rejected, resulted in an estimated annual economic loss of USD 34,774–62,632. The rejects were dominated by polypropylene (51.58%), polyethylene terephthalate (28.42%), and polyvinyl chloride (20%). Polypropylene exhibited the highest energy recovery potential (28.82 MJ/kg HHV), whereas polyvinyl chloride presented processing challenges due to high chlorine content (36.7 wt%) and dehydrochlorination at approximately 280 °C. AHP-TOPSIS ranked gasification as the most suitable pathway (Ri = 0.718), followed by pyrolysis (Ri = 0.517) and then depolymerization (Ri = 0.196). These findings provide empirical evidence for advancing chemical recycling strategies and transforming plastic rejects into valuable resources within emerging circular economies.
SN - 2073-4360
ER -