Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
182,549 studies31 sourcesUpdated 25 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Biogeosciences

Variations in Arctic aerosol iron solubility in relation to leaching methodology, air mass characteristics, and seasonality

  1. 1University of Delaware (Newark, United States of America)
  2. 2Skidaway Institute of Oceanography (Savannah, United States of America)

Abstract

Atmospheric deposition of the essential micronutrient, iron (Fe), can have an important influence on primary production and marine biogeochemistry. In the Arctic Ocean, the ongoing shift towards seasonal ice coverage means that summertime atmospheric deposition increasingly takes place directly to the surface ocean, rather than onto sea ice. As a result, atmospheric deposition of material emitted from natural and anthropogenic sources may become a more relevant Fe input to the region. As part of the U.S. GEOTRACES GN01 section, aerosols and precipitation samples were collected to quantify the atmospheric delivery of Fe and other trace elements to the Arctic Ocean. Aerosol Fe solubility was assessed using three different leaching approaches. The readily soluble fraction, determined by rapid exposure leaches with ultrapure water (UPW) and filtered seawater (SW) was low throughout GN01, averaging 0.7 % and 1.6 %, respectively. Solubility determined using a more aggressive acetic acid (HAc) leach as an upper limit estimate of post-deposition aerosol Fe bioavailability averaged 44 %. Comparison to Fe UPW-solubility data from winter (median 6.5 %) and springtime (median 1.9 %) aerosol samples collected during the MOSAiC expedition suggests a strong seasonality to Arctic aerosol Fe solubility, potentially associated with winter/springtime Arctic haze. Summertime bulk deposition fluxes, calculated by applying the beryllium-7 method to GN01 data, were estimated at 0.9 ± 1.3 nmolm-2d-1 UPW-soluble Fe, 2.4 ± 1.9 nmolm-2d-1 SW-soluble Fe, and 46 ± 48 nmolm-2d-1 HAc-soluble Fe. Thus, the UPW-soluble Fe flux during GN01 was around an order of magnitude lower than that measured during the winter months despite bulk deposition velocity being almost twice as fast during the summer.

Versions

Related

  1. Hydrologic response to changes in land use and variations of physical catchment characteristics
    Iyasu Zewde, Hayelom Belay, Awet Arefe +1
    Water SciencePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textHydrology & soilsDOAJ
  2. Characteristics of seasonal snow cover variations and their effects on soil moisture and vegetation dynamics in Xinjiang
    Xiaoyan Qiu, Zhenxia Mu, Rongqin Yang +2
    Ecological IndicatorsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textAtmospheric science & meteorologyDOAJ
  3. Spatial structuring dominates over seasonality in tropical coastal microbiomes: Insights from New Caledonia's Indo‐Pacific lagoon
    Pierre‐louis Stenger, Clarisse Majorel, Lysa Valette +4
    Journal of Environmental QualityPeer-reviewedPublisher termsFull textEcologyMicrobiologyHAL
  4. Surface temperatures drive strong seasonality in urban reactive carbon emissions
    Michael P. Vermeuel, Dylan B. Millet, Róisín Commane +7
    Science AdvancesPeer-reviewedLicence not statedAtmospheric science & meteorologyCrossref
  5. Microbial community structure and pathogen persistence in tropical drinking water distribution systems: the role of seasonality and treatment
    Youri Vingataramin, Isaure Quétel, Nina Allouch +1
    Total Environment MicrobiologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full text2 citedEnvironmental science & pollutionHAL
BibTeX
@article{marsay2026variations,
  title = {{Variations in Arctic aerosol iron solubility in relation to leaching methodology, air mass characteristics, and seasonality}},
  author = {Chris M. Marsay and Alina M. Ebling and Peter L. Morton and William M. Landing and Clifton S. Buck},
  journal = {Biogeosciences},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.5194/bg-23-6857-2026},
  url = {https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/23/6857/2026/},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Variations in Arctic aerosol iron solubility in relation to leaching methodology, air mass characteristics, and seasonality
AU  - Chris M. Marsay
AU  - Alina M. Ebling
AU  - Peter L. Morton
AU  - William M. Landing
AU  - Clifton S. Buck
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/05
JO  - Biogeosciences
DO  - 10.5194/bg-23-6857-2026
UR  - https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/23/6857/2026/
AB  - Atmospheric deposition of the essential micronutrient, iron (Fe), can have an important influence on primary production and marine biogeochemistry. In the Arctic Ocean, the ongoing shift towards seasonal ice coverage means that summertime atmospheric deposition increasingly takes place directly to the surface ocean, rather than onto sea ice. As a result, atmospheric deposition of material emitted from natural and anthropogenic sources may become a more relevant Fe input to the region. As part of the U.S. GEOTRACES GN01 section, aerosols and precipitation samples were collected to quantify the atmospheric delivery of Fe and other trace elements to the Arctic Ocean. Aerosol Fe solubility was assessed using three different leaching approaches. The readily soluble fraction, determined by rapid exposure leaches with ultrapure water (UPW) and filtered seawater (SW) was low throughout GN01, averaging 0.7 % and 1.6 %, respectively. Solubility determined using a more aggressive acetic acid (HAc) leach as an upper limit estimate of post-deposition aerosol Fe bioavailability averaged 44 %. Comparison to Fe UPW-solubility data from winter (median 6.5 %) and springtime (median 1.9 %) aerosol samples collected during the MOSAiC expedition suggests a strong seasonality to Arctic aerosol Fe solubility, potentially associated with winter/springtime Arctic haze. Summertime bulk deposition fluxes, calculated by applying the beryllium-7 method to GN01 data, were estimated at 0.9 ± 1.3 nmolm-2d-1 UPW-soluble Fe, 2.4 ± 1.9 nmolm-2d-1 SW-soluble Fe, and 46 ± 48 nmolm-2d-1 HAc-soluble Fe. Thus, the UPW-soluble Fe flux during GN01 was around an order of magnitude lower than that measured during the winter months despite bulk deposition velocity being almost twice as fast during the summer.
SN  - 1726-4189
ER  -