Analysis of the influence of gradual changes in matrix sentence similarity on neural envelope tracking
- 1Carl von Ossietzky Universitaet Oldenburg
Abstract
Neural tracking of speech is a well-established phenomenon in neuroscience. However, for speech signals with a fixed structure, significant correlations between speech envelopes and neurophysiological representations occur even for unheard sentences. We exploit a structured speech-in-noise matrix hearing test (Oldenburger Sentence Test, OLSA) to systematically quantify the relationship between acoustic sentence similarity and neural tracking. Simultaneous magnetoencephalography (MEG) and 76-channel electroencephalography (EEG) data, including 16 channels positioned directly around the ears (ear-EEG), were recorded from 21 young adults with normal hearing during the presentation of clean-speech audiobooks and OLSA sentences at six signal-to-noise ratios. A linear decoder trained on audiobooks reconstructed OLSA sentence envelopes. Reconstruction accuracies were compared using a linear mixed model across heard (matched) and unheard (mismatched) sentences of varying acoustic similarity. Significant reconstruction accuracies were achieved across MEG, EEG, and ear-EEG for both matched and mismatched sentences. For mismatched sentences, these accuracies gradually increased with their acoustic similarity to the heard speech data. The high similarity between sentences, which is especially prominent in matrix tests, can cause significant spurious tracking for mismatched stimuli. This effect can reach levels comparable to those of matched sentences and can be mistaken for true neural tracking. Robust neural tracking across modalities further supported the established viability of ear-EEG compared to whole-head systems.
Related
- RDEmbed: A Sentence-Embedding Framework for Rare Disease Phenotype Representation and Phenotypic Similarity Analysis
- Speech Tracking in fMRI Reveals a Distinct Response to Sentence Boundaries During Comprehension
- Gradual evolution of multiplexed spatial coding within a conserved hippocampal scaffold
- Expression patterns of CD24 and CD27 resolve the origins and gradual differentiation of CD11c+ atypical memory B-cells after malaria infection
- Gradual Extinction via US Intensity Reduction: a Translational Test of Fear Memory Updating in Humans
BibTeX
@misc{habersetzer2026analysis,
title = {{Analysis of the influence of gradual changes in matrix sentence similarity on neural envelope tracking}},
author = {T. Habersetzer and B. T. Meyer and A. Radeloff},
howpublished = {bioRxiv},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.64898/2026.09.21.752993},
url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.21.752993v1},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Analysis of the influence of gradual changes in matrix sentence similarity on neural envelope tracking
AU - T. Habersetzer
AU - B. T. Meyer
AU - A. Radeloff
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/21
PB - bioRxiv
DO - 10.64898/2026.09.21.752993
UR - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.21.752993v1
AB - Neural tracking of speech is a well-established phenomenon in neuroscience. However, for speech signals with a fixed structure, significant correlations between speech envelopes and neurophysiological representations occur even for unheard sentences. We exploit a structured speech-in-noise matrix hearing test (Oldenburger Sentence Test, OLSA) to systematically quantify the relationship between acoustic sentence similarity and neural tracking. Simultaneous magnetoencephalography (MEG) and 76-channel electroencephalography (EEG) data, including 16 channels positioned directly around the ears (ear-EEG), were recorded from 21 young adults with normal hearing during the presentation of clean-speech audiobooks and OLSA sentences at six signal-to-noise ratios. A linear decoder trained on audiobooks reconstructed OLSA sentence envelopes. Reconstruction accuracies were compared using a linear mixed model across heard (matched) and unheard (mismatched) sentences of varying acoustic similarity. Significant reconstruction accuracies were achieved across MEG, EEG, and ear-EEG for both matched and mismatched sentences. For mismatched sentences, these accuracies gradually increased with their acoustic similarity to the heard speech data. The high similarity between sentences, which is especially prominent in matrix tests, can cause significant spurious tracking for mismatched stimuli. This effect can reach levels comparable to those of matched sentences and can be mistaken for true neural tracking. Robust neural tracking across modalities further supported the established viability of ear-EEG compared to whole-head systems.
ER -