Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 22 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Frontiers in Oncology

A pretreatment TNM-metabolic vulnerability score with EBV DNA adjustment for risk stratification in non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma

4 affiliations
  1. 1Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University
  2. 2The First Clinical Medical College, Gannan Medical University
  3. 3Department of Oncology, Ma’anshan 17th Metallurgical Hospital
  4. 4Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University

Abstract

Background: TNM stage and pretreatment plasma Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA are central to risk assessment in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), but they do not fully capture host metabolic reserve.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 160 patients with non-metastatic NPC treated from 2013 to 2022. The integrated metabolic vulnerability score (IMVS; range, 0-3) assigned 1 point each for stage IVA, triglyceride-to-HDL cholesterol ratio <1.217, and body mass index <23.79 kg/m2. Cox regression and bootstrap internal validation evaluated progression-free survival (PFS), with EBV DNA included as an adjustment variable. A broader 271-patient cohort from the same institution was used only for internal sensitivity analysis.

Results: Thirty-three PFS events occurred in the modeling cohort. Five-year PFS was 100.0%, 91.9%, 72.1%, and 50.0% for IMVS scores 0, 1, 2, and 3, respectively. IMVS remained associated with PFS after adjustment for EBV DNA status (HR, 2.74; bootstrap percentile 95% CI, 1.89-4.75; P<0.001), although EBV DNA status itself was not independently significant in this cohort. The optimism-corrected AUC was 0.715 for stage IVA, THR, and BMI and 0.727 after adding EBV DNA. In the broader same-institution cohort, the association persisted but was attenuated (HR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.14-2.10; P = 0.005).

Conclusion: IMVS is an exploratory, low-cost risk-stratification tool that may complement, rather than replace, TNM stage and plasma EBV DNA. Prospective external validation and recalibration of the data-derived thresholds are required before clinical use.

Related

  1. Postdiagnostic pretreatment risk stratification for chondrosarcoma survival using routinely available registry variables: a SEER-based temporal validation study
    Qiong Wang, Junhu Wang, Jie Wang +2
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textGeneral medicineCrossref
  2. Pretreatment AMH–AFC stratification of poor-ovarian-response risk in young women with diminished ovarian reserve: a multicentre retrospective cohort study
    Yanning Lv, Jiahao Fang, Haiyan Yang +3
    Frontiers in endocrinologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEndocrinology & metabolismEurope PMC
  3. Multi-task deep learning integrating pretreatment MRI and whole slide images predicts induction chemotherapy response and survival in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma
    Jing Hou, Xiaochun Yi, Congrui Li +4
    PLOS Digital HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textMedical imaging & radiologyOncologyPLOS
  4. Artesunate Exploits Glutathione-Dependent Redox Vulnerability in Metastatic Lung Adenocarcinoma
    P. Munteanu, S. Neuhaus, P. Feldt +6
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textOncologybioRxiv
  5. Recursive partitioning analysis model based on ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT metabolic parameters for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with PD-1 inhibitors and chemotherapy.
    Huan Zhang, Ting Shen, Rongqin Fan +10
    Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging SocietyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textMedical imaging & radiologyEurope PMCPMC
BibTeX
@article{zhong2026pretreatment,
  title = {{A pretreatment TNM-metabolic vulnerability score with EBV DNA adjustment for risk stratification in non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma}},
  author = {Jinghua Zhong and Chunyan Zhou and Qiang Yi and Kui Zhong and Zheng Chen and Xinting Ouyang and Changyong Xu and Jiahua Liao and Weifeng Chen and Xiaojun Zhang},
  journal = {Frontiers in Oncology},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3389/fonc.2026.1914286},
  url = {https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2026.1914286/full},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - A pretreatment TNM-metabolic vulnerability score with EBV DNA adjustment for risk stratification in non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma
AU  - Jinghua Zhong
AU  - Chunyan Zhou
AU  - Qiang Yi
AU  - Kui Zhong
AU  - Zheng Chen
AU  - Xinting Ouyang
AU  - Changyong Xu
AU  - Jiahua Liao
AU  - Weifeng Chen
AU  - Xiaojun Zhang
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/30
JO  - Frontiers in Oncology
DO  - 10.3389/fonc.2026.1914286
UR  - https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2026.1914286/full
AB  - Background: TNM stage and pretreatment plasma Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA are central to risk assessment in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), but they do not fully capture host metabolic reserve.  Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 160 patients with non-metastatic NPC treated from 2013 to 2022. The integrated metabolic vulnerability score (IMVS; range, 0-3) assigned 1 point each for stage IVA, triglyceride-to-HDL cholesterol ratio <1.217, and body mass index <23.79 kg/m2. Cox regression and bootstrap internal validation evaluated progression-free survival (PFS), with EBV DNA included as an adjustment variable. A broader 271-patient cohort from the same institution was used only for internal sensitivity analysis.  Results: Thirty-three PFS events occurred in the modeling cohort. Five-year PFS was 100.0%, 91.9%, 72.1%, and 50.0% for IMVS scores 0, 1, 2, and 3, respectively. IMVS remained associated with PFS after adjustment for EBV DNA status (HR, 2.74; bootstrap percentile 95% CI, 1.89-4.75; P<0.001), although EBV DNA status itself was not independently significant in this cohort. The optimism-corrected AUC was 0.715 for stage IVA, THR, and BMI and 0.727 after adding EBV DNA. In the broader same-institution cohort, the association persisted but was attenuated (HR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.14-2.10; P = 0.005).  Conclusion: IMVS is an exploratory, low-cost risk-stratification tool that may complement, rather than replace, TNM stage and plasma EBV DNA. Prospective external validation and recalibration of the data-derived thresholds are required before clinical use.
SN  - 2234-943X
ER  -