Sustained neurosurgical decision support through remote multidisciplinary case conferencing: A six-year LMIC-HIC collaboration.
4 affiliations
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
- 2Department of Clinical Institute 1, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, Norway.
- 3Medical Museum and Telemedicine Unit, Teaching Hospital Jaffna, Sri Lanka.
- 4Teaching Hospital Jaffna, Sri Lanka.
Abstract
Introduction
Global disparities in neurosurgical care remain substantial in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where limited access to specialist expertise and supporting services can restrict timely treatment. Remote multidisciplinary case conferencing may provide specialist decision support using existing digital infrastructure, but longitudinal descriptions remain limited.Research question
Can a low-cost, clinician-led remote case-conference model provide sustained neurosurgical decision support in a resource-constrained setting?Methods
We conducted a descriptive implementation case study of a collaboration between Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, and Teaching Hospital Jaffna, Sri Lanka, from September 2019 to December 2025. Routine meeting logs were reviewed for meeting activity, case-discussion volume, imaging review, participants, workflow, and decision-support functions. The model combined asynchronous review of imaging and clinical information with synchronous multidisciplinary videoconferencing; direct remote patient examination was not routine.Results
Across 150 meetings, 1258 case-discussion episodes were recorded, involving review of more than 2700 CT and MRI studies. Some patients were discussed more than once, and the number of unique patients could not be reliably reconstructed. Discussions addressed diagnostic clarification, operative and non-operative management, surgical prioritization, additional investigation, follow-up, and referral or escalation. The model used existing digital infrastructure and professional time without dedicated project funding. Final clinical responsibility remained with the Sri Lankan treating team.Conclusion
This cross-border model was maintained for more than six years and demonstrates the feasibility of longitudinal neurosurgical decision support in a resource-constrained setting. Effects on clinical outcomes, professional development, implementation sustainability, and local capacity require prospective evaluation.
Related
- Implementation of a Multidisciplinary Rounding Tool in a Medical Intensive Care Unit and Its Association with Rounding Efficiency and Multidisciplinary Collaboration.
- Giant intracranial neurocysticercosis mimicking brain tumors: Two illustrative cases with a practical neurosurgical decision-making algorithm.
- Human–artificial intelligence collaboration in emergency medical services: from diagnostic algorithms to shared decision support
- Large Language Models as Decision Support in Breast Cancer Management: A Comparison with Multidisciplinary Team Decision-Making
- Impact of a Virtual Multidisciplinary Lymphoma Tumor Board on Clinical Decision-Making
BibTeX
@article{mahesparan2026sustained,
title = {{Sustained neurosurgical decision support through remote multidisciplinary case conferencing: A six-year LMIC-HIC collaboration.}},
author = {Rupavathana Mahesparan and B Dhuvarahan and S P Athiththan},
journal = {Brain \& spine},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1016/j.bas.2026.107473},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42904092},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Sustained neurosurgical decision support through remote multidisciplinary case conferencing: A six-year LMIC-HIC collaboration.
AU - Rupavathana Mahesparan
AU - B Dhuvarahan
AU - S P Athiththan
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/12
JO - Brain & spine
DO - 10.1016/j.bas.2026.107473
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42904092
AB - Introduction Global disparities in neurosurgical care remain substantial in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where limited access to specialist expertise and supporting services can restrict timely treatment. Remote multidisciplinary case conferencing may provide specialist decision support using existing digital infrastructure, but longitudinal descriptions remain limited.Research question Can a low-cost, clinician-led remote case-conference model provide sustained neurosurgical decision support in a resource-constrained setting?Methods We conducted a descriptive implementation case study of a collaboration between Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, and Teaching Hospital Jaffna, Sri Lanka, from September 2019 to December 2025. Routine meeting logs were reviewed for meeting activity, case-discussion volume, imaging review, participants, workflow, and decision-support functions. The model combined asynchronous review of imaging and clinical information with synchronous multidisciplinary videoconferencing; direct remote patient examination was not routine.Results Across 150 meetings, 1258 case-discussion episodes were recorded, involving review of more than 2700 CT and MRI studies. Some patients were discussed more than once, and the number of unique patients could not be reliably reconstructed. Discussions addressed diagnostic clarification, operative and non-operative management, surgical prioritization, additional investigation, follow-up, and referral or escalation. The model used existing digital infrastructure and professional time without dedicated project funding. Final clinical responsibility remained with the Sri Lankan treating team.Conclusion This cross-border model was maintained for more than six years and demonstrates the feasibility of longitudinal neurosurgical decision support in a resource-constrained setting. Effects on clinical outcomes, professional development, implementation sustainability, and local capacity require prospective evaluation.
SN - 2772-5294
ER -