Clustering without clusters: the meta-criterion and centroid reliability mistake continuous dynamics for discrete states
Abstract
Microstate analysis starts with clustering and the meta-criterion is a heuristic to find an optimum cluster number. We address the following questions: (i) what number is found for non-cluster-forming dynamical systems, (ii) do centroids fall in random attractor regions, (iii) do EEG topographies form clusters or a single connected structure in sensor space? We find that (i) the meta-criterion suggests spurious optimal cluster numbers (4-8) with high confidence on different attractor geometries, (ii) cluster centroids reliably fall in the same attractor regions, (iii) topological analysis of dynamical systems and resting-state EEG suggests that all form a single connected structure in their respective phase space, not clusters. We conclude that the meta-criterion should be used with caution and its results should not be taken as representing a ground truth. Cluster numbers deviating from the meta-criterion should not be discarded. A more far-reaching implication is that evidence for the existence of clusters in resting-state EEG data is still lacking. Microstate clustering may correspond to the partitioning of a single connected structure.
Related
- hpci improves reproducibility of computational biology research by integrating Continuous Integration with High Performance Computing clusters.
- Accurate stock movement prediction via centroid-based randomness smoothing
- Apparent sequential effects due to trial-to-trial fluctuations in decision criterion
- Benchmarking interface confidence as a selection criterion for computational nanobody design against survivin's BIR-domain groove
- A split-control criterion for few-shot adaptation in single-cell perturbation prediction
BibTeX
@misc{wegner2026clustering,
title = {{Clustering without clusters: the meta-criterion and centroid reliability mistake continuous dynamics for discrete states}},
author = {Frederic von Wegner and Gesine Hermann},
howpublished = {arXiv},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.02220},
eprint = {2610.02220},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.02220},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Clustering without clusters: the meta-criterion and centroid reliability mistake continuous dynamics for discrete states
AU - Frederic von Wegner
AU - Gesine Hermann
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/01
PB - arXiv
DO - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.02220
UR - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.02220
AB - Microstate analysis starts with clustering and the meta-criterion is a heuristic to find an optimum cluster number. We address the following questions: (i) what number is found for non-cluster-forming dynamical systems, (ii) do centroids fall in random attractor regions, (iii) do EEG topographies form clusters or a single connected structure in sensor space? We find that (i) the meta-criterion suggests spurious optimal cluster numbers (4-8) with high confidence on different attractor geometries, (ii) cluster centroids reliably fall in the same attractor regions, (iii) topological analysis of dynamical systems and resting-state EEG suggests that all form a single connected structure in their respective phase space, not clusters. We conclude that the meta-criterion should be used with caution and its results should not be taken as representing a ground truth. Cluster numbers deviating from the meta-criterion should not be discarded. A more far-reaching implication is that evidence for the existence of clusters in resting-state EEG data is still lacking. Microstate clustering may correspond to the partitioning of a single connected structure.
ER -