Mapping drivers of sexual and reproductive health injustices among adolescent girls in Kenya, Ghana, and Zambia: a scoping review
- 1Department of Bioethics and Health Humanities, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- 2Amref International University, Nairobi, Kenya
- 3Utrecht University School of Law, Institute of Human Rights, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Abstract
Background: Violation of adolescent girls’ sexual reproductive health rights (SRHR) leads to injustices that impact their well-being with potentially fatal and life-long consequences. These injustices often arise due to early marriage, and in 2022, approximately 12 million girls were married before the age of 18, globally. Adolescent girls’ SRHR is especially problematic in Africa, with the highest levels being from West and Central Africa (40%), followed by East and Southern Africa (32%). To address the problem of adolescent girls’ SRHR violations, interventions have included formulating laws and policies to protect the rights and welfare of girls in national legislation, as well as in regional and international human rights instruments. Despite these efforts, the literature that explicitly focuses on SRHR lacks mapping related to drivers of adolescent girls’ SRH injustices to inform programming and policies. Therefore, a scoping review was necessary to map and understand what drives these injustices of adolescent girls’ SRHR in Africa.
Methods: We conducted a scoping review of papers using a SRHR lens to identify the drivers of adolescent girls’ SRHR injustices in Kenya, Ghana, and Zambia, drawing on multidisciplinary papers. We utilised the Web of Science, PubMed, HeinOnline, JSTOR, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and HINARI databases. Drivers of adolescent girls’ SRHR injustices were extracted from the papers and thematically categorised.
Results: We identified 18 papers on adolescent girls’ SRHR from Kenya, Ghana, and Zambia. The main drivers therein included poverty, culture and gender norms, discrimination based on disability, low education level, peer pressure, and limited access to SRH services, such as financial and geographic barriers. The main issue that cut across all these drivers was adolescent pregnancy.
Conclusion: From the papers, using an SRHR frame, poverty is one of the main drivers that stands out and interconnects with others, including lack of education, lack of access to SRH services, and culture. All of the identified drivers were related to adolescent pregnancy. While adolescent pregnancy in itself may not be a human rights violation, it may relate to violations such as lack of access to services, lack of education, and early child marriage. The outcomes of the review will inform policy interventions to protect adolescent girls’ SRHR.
Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-026-28865-1.
Related
- Three decades of sexual and reproductive health literacy and information behaviour research on adolescent and young adult males: a scoping review
- Period poverty in Nigeria: a scoping review of its drivers and implications among women of reproductive age
- Mapping reproductive healthcare needs of incarcerated women: a scoping review.
- Reproductive life course histories and menopausal outcomes at midlife: evidence from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health
- Prevalence and associated factors of selected adverse sexual and reproductive health outcomes and gender-based violence among adolescent girls and young women in Ethiopia: an umbrella review
BibTeX
@article{anyona2026mapping,
title = {{Mapping drivers of sexual and reproductive health injustices among adolescent girls in Kenya, Ghana, and Zambia: a scoping review}},
author = {Dona Anyona and Rieke van der Graaf and Fleur Kootstra and Josephat Nyagero and Julie Fraser and Johannes J. M. van Delden},
journal = {BMC Public Health},
year = {2026},
month = aug,
doi = {10.1186/s12889-026-28865-1},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-026-28865-1},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Mapping drivers of sexual and reproductive health injustices among adolescent girls in Kenya, Ghana, and Zambia: a scoping review
AU - Dona Anyona
AU - Rieke van der Graaf
AU - Fleur Kootstra
AU - Josephat Nyagero
AU - Julie Fraser
AU - Johannes J. M. van Delden
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/08/11
JO - BMC Public Health
DO - 10.1186/s12889-026-28865-1
UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-026-28865-1
AB - Background: Violation of adolescent girls’ sexual reproductive health rights (SRHR) leads to injustices that impact their well-being with potentially fatal and life-long consequences. These injustices often arise due to early marriage, and in 2022, approximately 12 million girls were married before the age of 18, globally. Adolescent girls’ SRHR is especially problematic in Africa, with the highest levels being from West and Central Africa (40%), followed by East and Southern Africa (32%). To address the problem of adolescent girls’ SRHR violations, interventions have included formulating laws and policies to protect the rights and welfare of girls in national legislation, as well as in regional and international human rights instruments. Despite these efforts, the literature that explicitly focuses on SRHR lacks mapping related to drivers of adolescent girls’ SRH injustices to inform programming and policies. Therefore, a scoping review was necessary to map and understand what drives these injustices of adolescent girls’ SRHR in Africa. Methods: We conducted a scoping review of papers using a SRHR lens to identify the drivers of adolescent girls’ SRHR injustices in Kenya, Ghana, and Zambia, drawing on multidisciplinary papers. We utilised the Web of Science, PubMed, HeinOnline, JSTOR, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and HINARI databases. Drivers of adolescent girls’ SRHR injustices were extracted from the papers and thematically categorised. Results: We identified 18 papers on adolescent girls’ SRHR from Kenya, Ghana, and Zambia. The main drivers therein included poverty, culture and gender norms, discrimination based on disability, low education level, peer pressure, and limited access to SRH services, such as financial and geographic barriers. The main issue that cut across all these drivers was adolescent pregnancy. Conclusion: From the papers, using an SRHR frame, poverty is one of the main drivers that stands out and interconnects with others, including lack of education, lack of access to SRH services, and culture. All of the identified drivers were related to adolescent pregnancy. While adolescent pregnancy in itself may not be a human rights violation, it may relate to violations such as lack of access to services, lack of education, and early child marriage. The outcomes of the review will inform policy interventions to protect adolescent girls’ SRHR. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-026-28865-1.
SN - 1471-2458
ER -