Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 19 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYICES Journal of Marine Science

Potential exposure of loggerhead turtles to pelagic longliners constrains dynamic spatial avoidance in the western Indian Ocean

2 more authors

Abstract

Fisheries bycatch remains the leading threat to loggerhead turtle (Caretta caretta) populations worldwide, yet interaction risk in the Indian Ocean has been poorly quantified. Here, we assess potential exposure by quantifying the spatiotemporal overlap between oceanic-stage loggerhead turtle foraging habitats and pelagic longline fisheries across the western Indian Ocean. Using satellite telemetry data from tracked individuals exhibiting foraging behaviour, we developed high-resolution daily predictions of foraging habitat suitability by coupling environmental predictors with an ensemble of machine-learning species distribution models. We generated predictions from June 2017 to May 2020 and evaluated them within their area of applicability. We then quantified horizontal overlap with pelagic longline effort derived from Global Fishing Watch and examined the spatial distribution of fishing activity relative to core turtle foraging areas, to assess whether dynamic spatial avoidance based solely on horizontal overlap is feasible. Loggerhead foraging habitats showed marked regional and seasonal contrasts. In the northwest Indian Ocean, suitable habitats were persistent but shifted latitudinally in response to monsoon-driven oceanographic variability, whereas in the southwest Indian Ocean, foraging habitat suitability exhibited strong seasonality associated with the Agulhas Current system and subtropical frontal zones. Overlap with pelagic longlining was substantially higher in the southwest (52% of fishing hours within core foraging areas) than in the northwest (23%), with pronounced seasonal peaks between austral autumn and winter. In both regions, a large proportion of fishing effort occurred well inside core foraging habitats, indicating that effective spatial avoidance would require displacing fishing activity far beyond habitat boundaries. Dynamic spatial management has greater potential to reduce turtle-fishery overlap than permanent static closures, while also outperforming spatially fixed seasonal closures. Nevertheless, our results highlight fundamental limitations of real-time horizontal spatial avoidance measures where fisheries and turtles respond to the same dynamic oceanographic features. While dynamic ocean management may reduce interactions at habitat margins, mitigating loggerhead bycatch in the western Indian Ocean will likely require complementary strategies, including gear-based mitigation, adaptive effort controls, and coordinated regional governance. These findings underscore the need to integrate ecological dynamics and fisheries behaviour, while also accounting for climate variability, when designing bycatch mitigation strategies for highly mobile marine species.

Related

  1. Paired exposure to blue light and nutrient alters subsequent photo-avoidance in Physarum polycephalum
    Q. Wang, N. Gaspers, M. Sims +2
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textZoology & animal behaviourbioRxiv
  2. Repeated shrimp allergen exposure drives 5-lipoxygenase-dependent avoidance and selective gut-brain activation
    C. M. Andrade, N. de Souza Pinto, B. G. Costa Lima +11
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textImmunologybioRxiv
  3. Characterization of skin, cloacal, and respiratory-associated microbiota in Mediterranean loggerhead and Green Sea turtle populations
    Vanessa M. Bachmann, Sandra Hochscheid, Andrea Affuso +9
    Frontiers in MicrobiologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0MicrobiologyFrontiersCrossref
  4. Subacute oral exposure to Fumaria parviflora aromatic water (hydrosol) is associated with 2,4-DTBP-related toxicity in rats, with molecular docking suggesting a potential pro-oxidant role
    Valiollah Keshavarz, Mahla Saffari, Forouzan Rahmani +3
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textPlant biologyCrossref
  5. Potential exposure risk of global timber production, carbon stocking, and biodiversity to forest pests
    Yuxin Qiao, Jianquan Liu, David P. Edwards
    Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEcologyCrossref
BibTeX
@article{monsinjon2026potential,
  title = {{Potential exposure of loggerhead turtles to pelagic longliners constrains dynamic spatial avoidance in the western Indian Ocean}},
  author = {Jonathan Monsinjon and Antoine Laforge and Philippe Gaspar and Anne Barat and Olivier Bousquet and Stéphane Ciccione and Claire Jean and Mathieu Barret and Katia Ballorain and Mayeul Dalleau and Sylvain Bonhommeau and Pascal Bach and Philippe Sabarros and Jerome Bourjea},
  journal = {ICES Journal of Marine Science},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.1093/icesjms/fsag173},
  url = {https://hal.science/hal-05854063v1},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Potential exposure of loggerhead turtles to pelagic longliners constrains dynamic spatial avoidance in the western Indian Ocean
AU  - Jonathan Monsinjon
AU  - Antoine Laforge
AU  - Philippe Gaspar
AU  - Anne Barat
AU  - Olivier Bousquet
AU  - Stéphane Ciccione
AU  - Claire Jean
AU  - Mathieu Barret
AU  - Katia Ballorain
AU  - Mayeul Dalleau
AU  - Sylvain Bonhommeau
AU  - Pascal Bach
AU  - Philippe Sabarros
AU  - Jerome Bourjea
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/05
JO  - ICES Journal of Marine Science
DO  - 10.1093/icesjms/fsag173
UR  - https://hal.science/hal-05854063v1
AB  - Fisheries bycatch remains the leading threat to loggerhead turtle (Caretta caretta) populations worldwide, yet interaction risk in the Indian Ocean has been poorly quantified. Here, we assess potential exposure by quantifying the spatiotemporal overlap between oceanic-stage loggerhead turtle foraging habitats and pelagic longline fisheries across the western Indian Ocean. Using satellite telemetry data from tracked individuals exhibiting foraging behaviour, we developed high-resolution daily predictions of foraging habitat suitability by coupling environmental predictors with an ensemble of machine-learning species distribution models. We generated predictions from June 2017 to May 2020 and evaluated them within their area of applicability. We then quantified horizontal overlap with pelagic longline effort derived from Global Fishing Watch and examined the spatial distribution of fishing activity relative to core turtle foraging areas, to assess whether dynamic spatial avoidance based solely on horizontal overlap is feasible. Loggerhead foraging habitats showed marked regional and seasonal contrasts. In the northwest Indian Ocean, suitable habitats were persistent but shifted latitudinally in response to monsoon-driven oceanographic variability, whereas in the southwest Indian Ocean, foraging habitat suitability exhibited strong seasonality associated with the Agulhas Current system and subtropical frontal zones. Overlap with pelagic longlining was substantially higher in the southwest (52% of fishing hours within core foraging areas) than in the northwest (23%), with pronounced seasonal peaks between austral autumn and winter. In both regions, a large proportion of fishing effort occurred well inside core foraging habitats, indicating that effective spatial avoidance would require displacing fishing activity far beyond habitat boundaries. Dynamic spatial management has greater potential to reduce turtle-fishery overlap than permanent static closures, while also outperforming spatially fixed seasonal closures. Nevertheless, our results highlight fundamental limitations of real-time horizontal spatial avoidance measures where fisheries and turtles respond to the same dynamic oceanographic features. While dynamic ocean management may reduce interactions at habitat margins, mitigating loggerhead bycatch in the western Indian Ocean will likely require complementary strategies, including gear-based mitigation, adaptive effort controls, and coordinated regional governance. These findings underscore the need to integrate ecological dynamics and fisheries behaviour, while also accounting for climate variability, when designing bycatch mitigation strategies for highly mobile marine species.
SN  - 1054-3139
SN  - 1095-9289
ER  -