Retrospective Comparison of the Pericapsular Nerve Group Block Versus the Fascia Iliaca Block for Hip Fractures in the Emergency Department.
- 1Eisenhower Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Rancho Mirage, California.
- 2University of California, Irvine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Orange, California.
Abstract
Introduction
Hip fractures are a common injury among the elderly and a substantial cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Pain management is an essential component of care for patients with hip fractures, particularly for improving patient outcomes. Ultrasound-guided nerve blocks such as the fascia iliaca block (FIB) are evidence-based means of providing perioperative analgesia and reducing opioid use. Newer nerve blocks, such as the pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block, may serve as alternatives to the FIB. The objective of this study was to retrospectively compare pain reduction following the PENG block and FIB in patients with hip fractures treated in our emergency department. Secondary objectives included block-related complications such as local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST), greater hospital length of stay, and increase in mortality.Methods
The primary outcome measure was to investigate whether the PENG block is an effective alternative to FIB in achieving analgesia. Secondary objectives include data on rates of LAST, block complications, hospital length of stay, and mortality. We conducted a retrospective chart review on adult patients (≥18 years) with hip fractures who received either a FIB or PENG block between June 2021 and June 2023. Among the participants, pain scores (0-10 scale) were recorded before and after the block. Opioid use 24 hours postblock was also documented. We used generalized estimating equation modeling to compare pre-to-post block pain reduction between the FIB and PENG block groups.Results
A total of 88 participants met inclusion criteria (73 FIB, 15 PENG). The mean (SD) preblock pain scores were 6.5 (2.1) for FIB and 7.9 (1.6) for PENG, improving to 4.4 (2.0) and 4.3 (2.1) postblock, respectively. Generalized estimating equation analysis revealed a statistically significant greater reduction in pain for the PENG group compared to FIB (mean difference = 1.42; 95% CI, 0.21-2.63; P = .02). In this study, there were no cases of local anesthetic systemic toxicity or other block-related complications observed (0%; 95% CI, 0%-3.4%).Conclusion
Patients who received the PENG block achieved a greater reduction in pain scores compared to the FIB in this small retrospective cohort study. These findings suggest that the PENG block may be an effective alternative to FIB for analgesia in this setting. However, larger, prospective studies are needed to confirm these results. Given the study design and baseline differences in pain scores, these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Related
- Clinical and radiographic features of fractures raising suspicion of non-accidental trauma in young children: A retrospective emergency department study.
- Emergency Department Management of Ankle Fractures: A Narrative Review
- Regional nerve blocks are associated with greater early analgesia for femoral neck fractures in the emergency department
- Vertebral artery injury in patients presenting to the emergency department with cervical spine fractures: national trends, predictors, and cerebrovascular outcomes.
- Orthopaedic Consultation Versus No Consultation for Clavicle, Radial Head, and Proximal Humerus Fractures: Association with Post-Imaging Emergency Department Length of Stay
BibTeX
@article{kim2026retrospective,
title = {{Retrospective Comparison of the Pericapsular Nerve Group Block Versus the Fascia Iliaca Block for Hip Fractures in the Emergency Department.}},
author = {Theresa Kim and Vahe Martikian and Soheil Saadat and Michael Hetzel and Matthew Whited and Ami Kurzweil},
journal = {The western journal of emergency medicine},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.5811/westjem.53940},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42900922},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Retrospective Comparison of the Pericapsular Nerve Group Block Versus the Fascia Iliaca Block for Hip Fractures in the Emergency Department.
AU - Theresa Kim
AU - Vahe Martikian
AU - Soheil Saadat
AU - Michael Hetzel
AU - Matthew Whited
AU - Ami Kurzweil
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/24
JO - The western journal of emergency medicine
DO - 10.5811/westjem.53940
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42900922
AB - Introduction Hip fractures are a common injury among the elderly and a substantial cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Pain management is an essential component of care for patients with hip fractures, particularly for improving patient outcomes. Ultrasound-guided nerve blocks such as the fascia iliaca block (FIB) are evidence-based means of providing perioperative analgesia and reducing opioid use. Newer nerve blocks, such as the pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block, may serve as alternatives to the FIB. The objective of this study was to retrospectively compare pain reduction following the PENG block and FIB in patients with hip fractures treated in our emergency department. Secondary objectives included block-related complications such as local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST), greater hospital length of stay, and increase in mortality.Methods The primary outcome measure was to investigate whether the PENG block is an effective alternative to FIB in achieving analgesia. Secondary objectives include data on rates of LAST, block complications, hospital length of stay, and mortality. We conducted a retrospective chart review on adult patients (≥18 years) with hip fractures who received either a FIB or PENG block between June 2021 and June 2023. Among the participants, pain scores (0-10 scale) were recorded before and after the block. Opioid use 24 hours postblock was also documented. We used generalized estimating equation modeling to compare pre-to-post block pain reduction between the FIB and PENG block groups.Results A total of 88 participants met inclusion criteria (73 FIB, 15 PENG). The mean (SD) preblock pain scores were 6.5 (2.1) for FIB and 7.9 (1.6) for PENG, improving to 4.4 (2.0) and 4.3 (2.1) postblock, respectively. Generalized estimating equation analysis revealed a statistically significant greater reduction in pain for the PENG group compared to FIB (mean difference = 1.42; 95% CI, 0.21-2.63; P = .02). In this study, there were no cases of local anesthetic systemic toxicity or other block-related complications observed (0%; 95% CI, 0%-3.4%).Conclusion Patients who received the PENG block achieved a greater reduction in pain scores compared to the FIB in this small retrospective cohort study. These findings suggest that the PENG block may be an effective alternative to FIB for analgesia in this setting. However, larger, prospective studies are needed to confirm these results. Given the study design and baseline differences in pain scores, these findings should be interpreted with caution.
SN - 1936-900X
SN - 1936-9018
ER -