A forecast-to-dispatch workflow for day-ahead operation of a regional natural gas transmission network based on station-level load prediction and linepack target setting
5 affiliations
- 1Surface Engineering Design Center, PetroChina Southwest Oil & Gasfield Company, Chengdu, China
- 2Development and Planning Department, China National Petroleum Corporation, Beijing, China
- 3Gas Field Development and Management Department, PetroChina Southwest Oil & Gasfield Company, Chengdu, China
- 4Gas Distribution and Transmission Management Department, PetroChina Southwest Oil & Gasfield Company, Chengdu, China
- 5Kunlun Digital Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China
Abstract
Day-ahead operation of regional natural gas transmission networks requires station demand forecasts and their translation into inventory-preparation references. This study evaluated a sequential forecast-to-dispatch workflow for the Chongqing regional gas network. Six forecasting models were assessed under a leakage-controlled 30-day walk-forward protocol. Across nine routine stations, mean station-level MAPE was 8.61% for SARIMAX, 8.95% for XGBoost, and 9.78% for GRU. The corresponding values were 10.93% for LSTM, 11.63% for BPNN, and 11.77% for CNN-BiLSTM-Attention. Station G was assessed separately as a data-quality boundary case; Station K was excluded because only 62 observations were available. An independent archived 18-day hourly dataset reported reconstruction MAPE of 6.7%−8.1% and peak-timing deviations of 1.0–1.5 h. A retrospective West-pipeline case for 22 April 2023 traced historical station forecasts through weighted aggregation, intermediate rounding, hourly reconstruction, and reduced-order linepack calculation. Its LFFX preparation target and the separate NGXDD and DLFX targets were 1.272, 4.702, and 1.571 × 10⁶ m³, respectively. All three targets passed case-specific deterministic inventory checks. The results support station-specific forecast-model selection and an explicit interface between daily prediction and segment-level inventory preparation.
Related
- The Noise-Transmission Burden of Diffusion Network: Why Image Prediction Can Outperform Noise Prediction
- Readiness-Constrained Pre-Islanding Dispatch for Military Microgrids
- Fixed Hall-Call Assignments and Floor-Ordered Pair Costs in Elevator Dispatch
- Privacy-Preserving Distributed Online Dispatch of Low-Carbon Microgrids with TCN–BiLSTM Probabilistic Photovoltaic Forecasts
- A Memory-Assisted Self-Adaptive Bonobo Optimizer for Economic Dispatch with Valve-Point Effects Including Combined Heat and Power Units
BibTeX
@article{liu2026forecasttodispatch,
title = {{A forecast-to-dispatch workflow for day-ahead operation of a regional natural gas transmission network based on station-level load prediction and linepack target setting}},
author = {Ying Liu and Yong Xiao and Zhiping Tang and Simin Zhong and Chenguang Yong and Yuanyuan Tian},
journal = {PLOS One},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0349981},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0349981},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - A forecast-to-dispatch workflow for day-ahead operation of a regional natural gas transmission network based on station-level load prediction and linepack target setting
AU - Ying Liu
AU - Yong Xiao
AU - Zhiping Tang
AU - Simin Zhong
AU - Chenguang Yong
AU - Yuanyuan Tian
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/05
JO - PLOS One
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0349981
UR - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0349981
AB - Day-ahead operation of regional natural gas transmission networks requires station demand forecasts and their translation into inventory-preparation references. This study evaluated a sequential forecast-to-dispatch workflow for the Chongqing regional gas network. Six forecasting models were assessed under a leakage-controlled 30-day walk-forward protocol. Across nine routine stations, mean station-level MAPE was 8.61% for SARIMAX, 8.95% for XGBoost, and 9.78% for GRU. The corresponding values were 10.93% for LSTM, 11.63% for BPNN, and 11.77% for CNN-BiLSTM-Attention. Station G was assessed separately as a data-quality boundary case; Station K was excluded because only 62 observations were available. An independent archived 18-day hourly dataset reported reconstruction MAPE of 6.7%−8.1% and peak-timing deviations of 1.0–1.5 h. A retrospective West-pipeline case for 22 April 2023 traced historical station forecasts through weighted aggregation, intermediate rounding, hourly reconstruction, and reduced-order linepack calculation. Its LFFX preparation target and the separate NGXDD and DLFX targets were 1.272, 4.702, and 1.571 × 10⁶ m³, respectively. All three targets passed case-specific deterministic inventory checks. The results support station-specific forecast-model selection and an explicit interface between daily prediction and segment-level inventory preparation.
SN - 1932-6203
ER -