Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,220 studies31 sourcesUpdated 10 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Local-discrepancy ambiguity sets for distributionally robust optimization

Abstract

In this paper, we introduce a new class of data-driven ambiguity sets for distributionally robust optimization (DRO) that aim to enhance the local inference accuracy of an unknown distribution. Building on optimal transport-based discrepancy measures, we depart from the conventional paradigm of monolithic ambiguity balls, which rely on a single global transport budget to capture distributional uncertainty. Instead, we introduce local-discrepancy ambiguity sets, where the support of the distribution is partitioned into predefined regions and transport cost constraints are imposed locally to each region. This added flexibility allows for a more refined characterization of plausible distributions by preventing highly imbalanced transport across regions. As a result, the proposed approach can yield less conservative and more robust decisions, particularly in settings where decisions depend on the local properties of the sample space. We further derive tractable reformulations of the resulting DRO problems and demonstrate through simulations that our method can outperform traditional Wasserstein ambiguity sets in terms of decision quality.

Related

  1. Conformal-DRO: Distributionally Robust Optimization with Conformalized Ambiguity Set
    Luhao Zhang, Shixiang Zhu
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textOptimisation & controlStatisticsarXiv
  2. Calibrating Ambiguity Set via Diagnostic Transport for Distributionally Robust Optimization
    Wenbin Zhou, Elizabeth Cucuzzella, Shixiang Zhu
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textOptimisation & controlStatisticsarXiv
  3. Distributionally robust chance-constrained standard quadratic optimization with Wasserstein ambiguity
    Immanuel M. Bomze, Daniel De Vicente, Simge Küçükyavuz
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  4. A Composite Bayesian Risk--Distributionally Robust Optimization Model for Stochastic Programming with Elliptical Distribution Ambiguity
    Renjie Chen, Huifu Xu
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textOptimisation & controlStatisticsarXiv
  5. Distributionally robust decision-making under ambiguity: case study of water environmental management
    Hidekazu Yoshioka, Motoh Tsujimura, Yumi Yoshioka +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textOptimisation & controlarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{papagoudis2026localdiscrepancy,
  title = {{Local-discrepancy ambiguity sets for distributionally robust optimization}},
  author = {Ilias Papagoudis and Dimitris Boskos},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.18590},
  eprint = {2610.18590},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.18590},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Local-discrepancy ambiguity sets for distributionally robust optimization
AU  - Ilias Papagoudis
AU  - Dimitris Boskos
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/13
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.18590
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.18590
AB  - In this paper, we introduce a new class of data-driven ambiguity sets for distributionally robust optimization (DRO) that aim to enhance the local inference accuracy of an unknown distribution. Building on optimal transport-based discrepancy measures, we depart from the conventional paradigm of monolithic ambiguity balls, which rely on a single global transport budget to capture distributional uncertainty. Instead, we introduce local-discrepancy ambiguity sets, where the support of the distribution is partitioned into predefined regions and transport cost constraints are imposed locally to each region. This added flexibility allows for a more refined characterization of plausible distributions by preventing highly imbalanced transport across regions. As a result, the proposed approach can yield less conservative and more robust decisions, particularly in settings where decisions depend on the local properties of the sample space. We further derive tractable reformulations of the resulting DRO problems and demonstrate through simulations that our method can outperform traditional Wasserstein ambiguity sets in terms of decision quality.
ER  -