Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 16 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

The Geometry of Randomized Smoothing on Feasible Sets

Abstract

Randomized smoothing certifies the probability of a fixed output event as the center of Gaussian noise moves. Feasibility or confidence filtering reports label probabilities only among retained proposals, producing a ratio. Its numerator is a fixed Gaussian event mass, while its denominator is the probability of retention and can change with the center. Substituting this ratio into the ordinary smoothing formula can therefore certify a ball that contains a decision boundary. We separate the problem into a geometric question and a certification question. Geometry determines when conditioning preserves Gaussian comparisons. Convex retained sets preserve the full comparison, while general sets require geometric control of the retained law as the center moves. Without such control, conditional probabilities imply no positive universal radius. Joint retention-and-label probabilities always yield a valid certificate for the same filtered predictor. A uniform covariance bound transfers divergence certificates to the retained law and can yield larger radii even when the Gaussian event comparison fails. Both methods admit finite-sample bounds. For a learned image classifier with a training-selected nonconvex filter, conditional Rényi bounds certify more images than joint-mass bounds without additional model evaluations. A released confidence filter exhibits verified label changes inside radii obtained by conditional substitution. An application of adaptive Gaussian composition covers causal finite-horizon executions with history-dependent center shifts under a pathwise energy bound.

Related

  1. An Improved Upper Bound for Finite Sidon Sets via Vector-Valued Smoothing
    Jianfeng Hou, Hongbin Zhao
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsarXiv
  2. Conformalized Safe Feasible Sets in Uncertain Decision Systems
    Yajie Bao, Yinjie Min, Haojie Ren +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  3. Convex Optimization with Nested Evolving Feasible Sets (CONES) under Time-Varying Loss Functions
    Rahul Vaze
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  4. Randomized and Oracle-Based Feasible Directions Methods for Nonsmooth Nonconvex Constrained Optimization
    Dan Greenstein, Nadav Hallak
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  5. Plunge bounds for Fourier concentration operators: geometry, smoothing, and wave packets
    Ahmadreza Azimifard
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAnalysis & PDEsMathematical physicsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{khilji2026geometry,
  title = {{The Geometry of Randomized Smoothing on Feasible Sets}},
  author = {Syed Izhan Khilji and Alireza Furutanpey and Schahram Dustdar},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.39497},
  eprint = {2609.39497},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.39497},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - The Geometry of Randomized Smoothing on Feasible Sets
AU  - Syed Izhan Khilji
AU  - Alireza Furutanpey
AU  - Schahram Dustdar
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/30
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.39497
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.39497
AB  - Randomized smoothing certifies the probability of a fixed output event as the center of Gaussian noise moves. Feasibility or confidence filtering reports label probabilities only among retained proposals, producing a ratio. Its numerator is a fixed Gaussian event mass, while its denominator is the probability of retention and can change with the center. Substituting this ratio into the ordinary smoothing formula can therefore certify a ball that contains a decision boundary. We separate the problem into a geometric question and a certification question. Geometry determines when conditioning preserves Gaussian comparisons. Convex retained sets preserve the full comparison, while general sets require geometric control of the retained law as the center moves. Without such control, conditional probabilities imply no positive universal radius. Joint retention-and-label probabilities always yield a valid certificate for the same filtered predictor. A uniform covariance bound transfers divergence certificates to the retained law and can yield larger radii even when the Gaussian event comparison fails. Both methods admit finite-sample bounds. For a learned image classifier with a training-selected nonconvex filter, conditional Rényi bounds certify more images than joint-mass bounds without additional model evaluations. A released confidence filter exhibits verified label changes inside radii obtained by conditional substitution. An application of adaptive Gaussian composition covers causal finite-horizon executions with history-dependent center shifts under a pathwise energy bound.
ER  -