Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 6 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDActa medica Philippina

Comparison of Single Drop versus Two Drops 0.5% Tropicamide Using Manual and Automated Refraction in Children Aged 5-7 Years: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

8 affiliations
  1. 1Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Philippine General Hospital, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines.
  2. 2Department of Ophthalmology, Department of Health - Governor Celestino Gallares Memorial Medical Center, Bohol, Philippines.
  3. 3Eye and Vision Institute, The Medical City, Pasig City, Philippines.
  4. 4International Eye Institute, St. Luke's Medical Center, Quezon City, Philippines.
  5. 5Department of Ophthalmology, Manila Doctors Hospital, Manila, Philippines.
  6. 6Department of Ophthalmology, Asian Hospital and Medical Center, Muntinlupa City, Philippines.
  7. 7Olivarez General Hospital, Parañaque City, Philippines.
  8. 8Department of Ophthalmology, Jose B. Lingad Memorial Medical Center, Pampanga, Philippines.

Abstract

Cycloplegia is important for obtaining accurate refractive measurements in children. However, the limited availability of cycloplegic agents in the Philippines presents challenges for pediatric mass-refraction programs. This study evaluated the efficacy and reliability of 0.5% tropicamide administered as a single-drop versus the standard two-drop regimen for obtaining cycloplegic refraction in children. This multicenter, randomized, single-sequence, crossover, controlled, single-blind study included children aged 5-7 years recruited from selected schools and a pediatric ophthalmology clinic in a tertiary hospital in the Philippines. Participants were randomized to receive a single drop and two drops of 0.5% tropicamide according to the study sequence. Automated refraction was performed at 5, 15, and 30 minutes, followed by manual refraction at 30-40 minutes. Another manual refraction performed 30-40 minutes after 2 drops of 0.5% tropicamide served as the reference standard. The pediatric ophthalmologists performing the reference refraction were masked to the automated refraction results. A total of 219 eyes from 111 children were included, 59% (66/111) of whom were male. Hyperopia was the most common refractive error (76%, 166/219), followed by astigmatism (62.6%, 137/219) and myopia (16%, 34/219). After a single drop of tropicamide, auto-mated refraction at 5, 15, and 30 minutes demonstrated significant differences from the reference standard in spherical equivalent (SE), sphere, cylinder, and axis (all P <0.05). The median SE values at 5, 15, and 30 minutes were 0.25 D (Interquartile Range or IQR, 1.25 D), 0.25 D (IQR, 1.50 D), and 0.375 D (IQR, 1.50 D), respectively, compared with 0.75 D (IQR, 1.75 D) for the reference refraction. In contrast, manual refraction performed 30-40 minutes after a single drop did not differ significantly from the reference standard for sphere (P = 0.479), cylinder (P = 0.470), axis (P = 0.137), or SE (P = 0.327). Following two drops, automated refraction at all time points remained significantly different from the reference standard for cylinder, axis, and SE. However, at 30 minutes, the spherical refraction did not differ significantly from the reference standard (P = 0.209). In children aged 5-7 years, manual refraction performed 30-40 minutes after either a single- or two-drop administration of 0.5% tropicamide produced results comparable with the reference standard. Automated refraction following a single drop demonstrated greater variability and should be interpreted with caution. For mass-refraction settings, a single-drop regimen followed by manual refraction after 30-40 minutes may be a practical alternative to the standard two-drop regimen. When automated refraction is used, the sphere obtained after two drops may provide an estimate of cycloplegic refraction.

Related

  1. Comparison of analgesic efficacy and safety between liposomal bupivacaine and ropivacaine for paravertebral block in patients undergoing thoracoscopic lung tumor surgery: a prospective double-blind randomized controlled trial
    Journal of thoracic diseasePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Comparison of Metronidazole Gel and Povidone‑Iodine for Vaginal Preparation in Preventing Post‑Cesarean Infection‑Related Morbidity: A Three‑Group Randomized Controlled Trial
    Fatemeh Davodabadi, Hamideh Parsapour, Behzad Imani +2
    Health science reportsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Comparison of sevoflurane and propofol on the novel oxygenation index and respiratory mechanics in gynecological laparoscopic surgery: a randomized controlled trial
    Meining Zhang, Shiwei Huang, Shaodan Xu +6
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textSurgery & anaesthesiaCrossref
  4. Comparison between practical and traditional blood flow restriction methods in upper limb resistance training: a study protocol for a randomized controlled clinical trial
    Gabriel Martins da Silva, Julia Waszczuk Vendrame, Guilherme Henrique da Silva Brandão +5
    TrialsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Clinical trials & evidence synthesisCrossref
  5. Extended Use of the Omnipod 5 Automated Insulin Delivery System in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: 12‐Month Extension of a Randomized Controlled Trial
    Eric Renard, Ruth S Weinstock, Alfred Penfornis +3
    Endocrinology, Diabetes & MetabolismPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textSystems & synthetic biologyEndocrinology & metabolismHAL
BibTeX
@article{torrefranca2026comparison,
  title = {{Comparison of Single Drop versus Two Drops 0.5% Tropicamide Using Manual and Automated Refraction in Children Aged 5-7 Years: A Randomized Controlled Trial.}},
  author = {Aramis B Torrefranca and Alvina Pauline D Santiago and Jose Antonio T Paulino and Paulita Pamela P Astudillo and Andrea Kristina Monzon-Pajarillo and Marissa N Valbuena},
  journal = {Acta medica Philippina},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.47895/amp.v60i17.14500},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42952911},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Comparison of Single Drop versus Two Drops 0.5% Tropicamide Using Manual and Automated Refraction in Children Aged 5-7 Years: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
AU  - Aramis B Torrefranca
AU  - Alvina Pauline D Santiago
AU  - Jose Antonio T Paulino
AU  - Paulita Pamela P Astudillo
AU  - Andrea Kristina Monzon-Pajarillo
AU  - Marissa N Valbuena
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/15
JO  - Acta medica Philippina
DO  - 10.47895/amp.v60i17.14500
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42952911
AB  - Cycloplegia is important for obtaining accurate refractive measurements in children. However, the limited availability of cycloplegic agents in the Philippines presents challenges for pediatric mass-refraction programs. This study evaluated the efficacy and reliability of 0.5% tropicamide administered as a single-drop versus the standard two-drop regimen for obtaining cycloplegic refraction in children. This multicenter, randomized, single-sequence, crossover, controlled, single-blind study included children aged 5-7 years recruited from selected schools and a pediatric ophthalmology clinic in a tertiary hospital in the Philippines. Participants were randomized to receive a single drop and two drops of 0.5% tropicamide according to the study sequence. Automated refraction was performed at 5, 15, and 30 minutes, followed by manual refraction at 30-40 minutes. Another manual refraction performed 30-40 minutes after 2 drops of 0.5% tropicamide served as the reference standard. The pediatric ophthalmologists performing the reference refraction were masked to the automated refraction results. A total of 219 eyes from 111 children were included, 59% (66/111) of whom were male. Hyperopia was the most common refractive error (76%, 166/219), followed by astigmatism (62.6%, 137/219) and myopia (16%, 34/219). After a single drop of tropicamide, auto-mated refraction at 5, 15, and 30 minutes demonstrated significant differences from the reference standard in spherical equivalent (SE), sphere, cylinder, and axis (all P <0.05). The median SE values at 5, 15, and 30 minutes were 0.25 D (Interquartile Range or IQR, 1.25 D), 0.25 D (IQR, 1.50 D), and 0.375 D (IQR, 1.50 D), respectively, compared with 0.75 D (IQR, 1.75 D) for the reference refraction. In contrast, manual refraction performed 30-40 minutes after a single drop did not differ significantly from the reference standard for sphere (P = 0.479), cylinder (P = 0.470), axis (P = 0.137), or SE (P = 0.327). Following two drops, automated refraction at all time points remained significantly different from the reference standard for cylinder, axis, and SE. However, at 30 minutes, the spherical refraction did not differ significantly from the reference standard (P = 0.209). In children aged 5-7 years, manual refraction performed 30-40 minutes after either a single- or two-drop administration of 0.5% tropicamide produced results comparable with the reference standard. Automated refraction following a single drop demonstrated greater variability and should be interpreted with caution. For mass-refraction settings, a single-drop regimen followed by manual refraction after 30-40 minutes may be a practical alternative to the standard two-drop regimen. When automated refraction is used, the sphere obtained after two drops may provide an estimate of cycloplegic refraction.
SN  - 0001-6071
SN  - 2094-9278
ER  -