Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 37 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYPLOS One

Lens dislocation, OCTA, and archived FBN1 reports: An exploratory study

  1. 1Department of Medical Genetics, Adiyaman University Faculty of Medicine, Adiyaman, Türkiye.
  2. 2Department of Ophthalmology, Beyoglu Eye Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye.
  3. 3Department of Ophthalmology, Bursa Yüksek İhtisas Training and Research Hospital, Bursa, Türkiye.

Abstract

Purpose: Lens dislocation (ectopia lentis) is a recognized anterior-segment manifestation of fibrillinopathy. This exploratory phenotype-first study compared macular optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) parameters between participants with and without documented lens dislocation and descriptively reviewed available archived clinical FBN1 reports. Methods: This retrospective, availability-based study included 16 participants classified by verified current or historical lens-dislocation status. Participant-level superficial capillary plexus (SCP) vessel density was calculated by averaging valid bilateral measurements or using the single valid eye. Five OCTA endpoints were compared using two-sided Mann–Whitney U tests; Benjamini–Hochberg q values were used as a multiplicity sensitivity analysis. Seven archived clinical FBN1 reports from lens-dislocation-positive (LD+) participants were summarized without variant reclassification. No genotype–OCTA association was assessed. Results: The cohort comprised 7 LD+ and 9 lens-dislocation-negative (LD−) participants; 15 participants (6 LD+ and 9 LD−) contributed quantitative OCTA data. Foveal SCP vessel density was lower in LD+ participants (median [IQR], 19.38% [18.68–20.04] vs 30.20% [29.20–31.85]; p = 0.036), but the finding was not retained after multiplicity sensitivity analysis (q = 0.180). Whole-image, parafoveal, and perifoveal vessel-density comparisons were not significant (p = 0.328, 0.272, and 0.238; q = 0.410 each), and OD-only foveal avascular zone area did not differ (n = 14; p = 0.606; q = 0.606). Six of seven archived reports documented an FBN1 variant; one was negative within its assay scope. Conclusions: The unadjusted foveal signal was not robust to multiplicity analysis, and other OCTA endpoints did not differ significantly. Marked between-group differences in spherical equivalent and axial length, the small sample, and heterogeneous routine-care genetic reports limit interpretation. These findings are hypothesis-generating and do not establish OCTA as a diagnostic or prognostic test or demonstrate an individual-level genotype–OCTA association.

Related

  1. Surgical management of intraocular lens dislocation in highly myopic eyes.
    Shiyu Tang, Chenxi Li, Zihan Xie +4
    Frontiers in medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Epidural Abscess in Routine Preoperative MRI Reports Versus Documented Operative Findings, and Exploratory Mortality Risk Factors in Surgically Treated Spondylodiscitis: A Retrospective Single-Centre Study
    Bahadır Balkanlı, Enver İpek, Mehmet Alp Yüksel +3
    Journal of clinical medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMCCrossref
  3. An X‐ray micro‐CT protocol enables non‐destructive 3D visualization of glandular architecture in archived paraffin‐embedded prostate cancer tissue
    Santiago Laguna‐Castro, Erna Mäkinen, Teemu Tolonen +2
    The journal of pathology. Clinical researchPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Associations of multiregional OCTA metrics and systemic hematologic biomarkers With 12-month diabetic retinopathy progression
    Lina Ge, Shenghai Huang, Weihe Zhou +4
    Frontiers in medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Refined Four-Layer Peripapillary OCTA Enables Layer-Specific Localization of Microvascular Alterations in Retinal Vein Occlusion
    Jinlian Zhan, Genming Liang, Xia Huang +3
    Translational vision science & technologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{cevik2026lens,
  title = {{Lens dislocation, OCTA, and archived FBN1 reports: An exploratory study}},
  author = {Muhammer Özgür Çevik and Metehan Simsek and Sadik Gorkem Cevik and Irfan Perente},
  journal = {PLOS One},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0361193},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0361193},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Lens dislocation, OCTA, and archived FBN1 reports: An exploratory study
AU  - Muhammer Özgür Çevik
AU  - Metehan Simsek
AU  - Sadik Gorkem Cevik
AU  - Irfan Perente
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/23
JO  - PLOS One
DO  - 10.1371/journal.pone.0361193
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0361193
AB  - Purpose: Lens dislocation (ectopia lentis) is a recognized anterior-segment manifestation of fibrillinopathy. This exploratory phenotype-first study compared macular optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) parameters between participants with and without documented lens dislocation and descriptively reviewed available archived clinical FBN1 reports. Methods: This retrospective, availability-based study included 16 participants classified by verified current or historical lens-dislocation status. Participant-level superficial capillary plexus (SCP) vessel density was calculated by averaging valid bilateral measurements or using the single valid eye. Five OCTA endpoints were compared using two-sided Mann–Whitney U tests; Benjamini–Hochberg q values were used as a multiplicity sensitivity analysis. Seven archived clinical FBN1 reports from lens-dislocation-positive (LD+) participants were summarized without variant reclassification. No genotype–OCTA association was assessed. Results: The cohort comprised 7 LD+ and 9 lens-dislocation-negative (LD−) participants; 15 participants (6 LD+ and 9 LD−) contributed quantitative OCTA data. Foveal SCP vessel density was lower in LD+ participants (median [IQR], 19.38% [18.68–20.04] vs 30.20% [29.20–31.85]; p = 0.036), but the finding was not retained after multiplicity sensitivity analysis (q = 0.180). Whole-image, parafoveal, and perifoveal vessel-density comparisons were not significant (p = 0.328, 0.272, and 0.238; q = 0.410 each), and OD-only foveal avascular zone area did not differ (n = 14; p = 0.606; q = 0.606). Six of seven archived reports documented an FBN1 variant; one was negative within its assay scope. Conclusions: The unadjusted foveal signal was not robust to multiplicity analysis, and other OCTA endpoints did not differ significantly. Marked between-group differences in spherical equivalent and axial length, the small sample, and heterogeneous routine-care genetic reports limit interpretation. These findings are hypothesis-generating and do not establish OCTA as a diagnostic or prognostic test or demonstrate an individual-level genotype–OCTA association.
SN  - 1932-6203
ER  -