Factors Associated with Self-Management Behavior in Hemodialysis Patients in Eastern China: A COM-B Model-Based Cross-Sectional Study
- 1Shulan International Medical College, Zhejiang Shuren University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310015, People’s Republic of China
- 2The Fourth Clinical Medical College, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310053, People’s Republic of China
- 3The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (Zhejiang Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310000, People’s Republic of China
Abstract
Background: Self-management behavior is closely linked to clinical outcomes and quality of life in hemodialysis patients, but evidence from high-resource East Asian regions, where behavioral execution remains paradoxically difficult, is limited.
Objective: To identify factors associated with self-management behavior and examine dimensional interactions based on the COM-B model among hemodialysis patients in Eastern China.
Methods: This cross-sectional study enrolled 345 hemodialysis patients from two tertiary hospitals in Hangzhou (September 2023 – September 2024). Data were collected using electronic questionnaires, including a general information form and the Chinese Hemodialysis Self-Management Behavior Scale. Descriptive statistics, univariate analysis, and forced-entry multiple linear regression were performed.
Results: Mean self-management score was 2.88±0.60 (moderate; range 1–4). Dimension scores: partnership (3.24±0.65), emotional management (3.09±0.70), problem-solving (2.86±0.68), and self-care behavior (2.57±0.68). Independent factors identified by multiple regression were education (β=0.230), marital status (β=0.213), income (β=0.206), dialysis vintage (β=0.203), and complications (β=−0.202), all P<0.05. Hierarchical regression showed no significant interactions among COM-B dimensions (ΔR2=0.000–0.004, all P>0.05), suggesting additive rather than multiplicative effects – a pattern not previously reported. The model explained 32.0% of the variance (adjusted R2=0.289). Education and dialysis vintage reflect capability; marital status and income reflect opportunity; complications affect both capability and motivation.
Conclusion: Self-management behavior was moderate, with self-care being the weakest domain. Education (capability) was the strongest positive factor, while complications (capability/motivation depletion) showed the most prominent negative effect. Causal inferences are precluded by the cross-sectional design. In similar eastern urban settings, low education, low income, divorce/widowhood, and heavy comorbidity burden represent potential intervention targets. Future research should design and validate stratified interventions across COM-B dimensions.
Related
- Serum Myonectin Levels Are Positively Associated With Physical Function and Lower Frailty‐Related Limitation in Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients: A Cross‐Sectional Study
- Prevalence and factors associated with physical function among patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis in Buraydah, Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study.
- Factors associated with self-management behavior among pregnant women with diet-controlled gestational diabetes mellitus in China: A cross-sectional study.
- Development of a nomogram for identifying prevalent medication discrepancy in maintenance hemodialysis patients: a multicenter cross-sectional study
- Construction and validation of an identification model for frailty in maintenance hemodialysis patients using multiple machine learning algorithms: a cross-sectional study of retrospectively collected data
BibTeX
@article{li2026factors,
title = {{Factors Associated with Self-Management Behavior in Hemodialysis Patients in Eastern China: A COM-B Model-Based Cross-Sectional Study}},
author = {Ling Li and Chenxin Yu and Qin Lin and Yanping Niu and Pei Chen and Anling Yao},
journal = {Patient preference and adherence},
year = {2026},
month = nov,
doi = {10.2147/ppa.s608526},
url = {https://doi.org/10.2147/ppa.s608526},
note = {CC BY-NC 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Factors Associated with Self-Management Behavior in Hemodialysis Patients in Eastern China: A COM-B Model-Based Cross-Sectional Study
AU - Ling Li
AU - Chenxin Yu
AU - Qin Lin
AU - Yanping Niu
AU - Pei Chen
AU - Anling Yao
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/11/01
JO - Patient preference and adherence
DO - 10.2147/ppa.s608526
UR - https://doi.org/10.2147/ppa.s608526
AB - Background: Self-management behavior is closely linked to clinical outcomes and quality of life in hemodialysis patients, but evidence from high-resource East Asian regions, where behavioral execution remains paradoxically difficult, is limited. Objective: To identify factors associated with self-management behavior and examine dimensional interactions based on the COM-B model among hemodialysis patients in Eastern China. Methods: This cross-sectional study enrolled 345 hemodialysis patients from two tertiary hospitals in Hangzhou (September 2023 – September 2024). Data were collected using electronic questionnaires, including a general information form and the Chinese Hemodialysis Self-Management Behavior Scale. Descriptive statistics, univariate analysis, and forced-entry multiple linear regression were performed. Results: Mean self-management score was 2.88±0.60 (moderate; range 1–4). Dimension scores: partnership (3.24±0.65), emotional management (3.09±0.70), problem-solving (2.86±0.68), and self-care behavior (2.57±0.68). Independent factors identified by multiple regression were education (β=0.230), marital status (β=0.213), income (β=0.206), dialysis vintage (β=0.203), and complications (β=−0.202), all P<0.05. Hierarchical regression showed no significant interactions among COM-B dimensions (ΔR2=0.000–0.004, all P>0.05), suggesting additive rather than multiplicative effects – a pattern not previously reported. The model explained 32.0% of the variance (adjusted R2=0.289). Education and dialysis vintage reflect capability; marital status and income reflect opportunity; complications affect both capability and motivation. Conclusion: Self-management behavior was moderate, with self-care being the weakest domain. Education (capability) was the strongest positive factor, while complications (capability/motivation depletion) showed the most prominent negative effect. Causal inferences are precluded by the cross-sectional design. In similar eastern urban settings, low education, low income, divorce/widowhood, and heavy comorbidity burden represent potential intervention targets. Future research should design and validate stratified interventions across COM-B dimensions.
SN - 1177-889X
ER -