Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
182,544 studies31 sourcesUpdated 4 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Data Protection in Function-Correcting Symbol-Pair Codes: Redundancy Bounds and Protection Profiles

Abstract

In several storage systems, including DNA storage and flash memory, errors affect neighbouring symbols jointly, and the Hamming metric does not adequately capture such error patterns. The symbol-pair read channel, introduced by Cassuto and Blaum~\cite{cassuto2011codes}, addresses this by reading consecutive pairs of symbols rather than individual symbols. Motivated by this, we introduce function-correcting symbol-pair codes with data protection (FCSPC-DP), which guarantee reliable recovery of a desired function of the message while simultaneously protecting the message itself against symbol-pair errors. We derive bounds on the optimal redundancy of such codes and establish a relationship with joint-pair distance matrices. We also give explicit constructions of FCSPC-DP for locally pair-bounded functions and symbol-pair weight functions. We introduce the pair-separation constant of a function, the minimum symbol-pair distance between messages sharing a function value, and show that when it is sufficiently large, data protection requires no additional redundancy: the optimal redundancy coincides with that of the corresponding code without data protection. Considering the symbol-pair analogue of the α-distance graph, we introduce two code invariants, the generation profile and the disconnection threshold, and use them to characterise a code's protection properties. Relating the two metrics through these invariants yields upper and lower bounds on the symbol-pair threshold in terms of its Hamming counterpart, both of which are attained. We further extend the classical Plotkin and sphere-packing bounds to this setting.

Related

  1. On Function-Correcting Lee Metric Codes with Data Protection
    Gyanendra K. Verma, Abhay Kumar Singh
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textGeneral mathematicsarXiv
  2. Collection de vignettes inégalement distribuées ou quand l'hétérogénéité est une protection
    Emmanuel Lesigne
    HALPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textGeneral mathematicsHAL
  3. Counter-terrorism: Protection Resources Allocation
    Igor Ushakov
    Reliability: Theory & ApplicationsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull text6 citedGeneral mathematicsDOAJ
  4. Counter-terrorism: Protection Resources Allocation. Part Ii. Branching System
    Igor Ushakov
    Reliability: Theory & ApplicationsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull text4 citedGeneral mathematicsDOAJ
  5. Universal Decoding for Unequal Error Protection
    Seyed AmirPouya Moeini, Albert Guillén i Fàbregas
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textGeneral mathematicsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{singh2026data,
  title = {{Data Protection in Function-Correcting Symbol-Pair Codes: Redundancy Bounds and Protection Profiles}},
  author = {Anamika Singh and Abhay Kumar Singh},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.10989},
  eprint = {2609.10989},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.10989},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Data Protection in Function-Correcting Symbol-Pair Codes: Redundancy Bounds and Protection Profiles
AU  - Anamika Singh
AU  - Abhay Kumar Singh
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/10
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.10989
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.10989
AB  - In several storage systems, including DNA storage and flash memory, errors affect neighbouring symbols jointly, and the Hamming metric does not adequately capture such error patterns. The symbol-pair read channel, introduced by Cassuto and Blaum~\cite{cassuto2011codes}, addresses this by reading consecutive pairs of symbols rather than individual symbols. Motivated by this, we introduce function-correcting symbol-pair codes with data protection (FCSPC-DP), which guarantee reliable recovery of a desired function of the message while simultaneously protecting the message itself against symbol-pair errors. We derive bounds on the optimal redundancy of such codes and establish a relationship with joint-pair distance matrices. We also give explicit constructions of FCSPC-DP for locally pair-bounded functions and symbol-pair weight functions. We introduce the pair-separation constant of a function, the minimum symbol-pair distance between messages sharing a function value, and show that when it is sufficiently large, data protection requires no additional redundancy: the optimal redundancy coincides with that of the corresponding code without data protection. Considering the symbol-pair analogue of the α-distance graph, we introduce two code invariants, the generation profile and the disconnection threshold, and use them to characterise a code's protection properties. Relating the two metrics through these invariants yields upper and lower bounds on the symbol-pair threshold in terms of its Hamming counterpart, both of which are attained. We further extend the classical Plotkin and sphere-packing bounds to this setting.
ER  -