Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,952 studies31 sourcesUpdated 27 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0Zenodo

Gravitational Lensing and the Classical Limit: Unifying Discrete Hardware Lag with General Relativity

Abstract

For a century, the central challenge of theoretical physics has been the "quantization of gravity", the attempt to force the continuous, smooth geometry of General Relativity (GR) into a discrete quantum framework. In this paper, we invert the paradigm. Within Computational Finitism, spacetime is already quantized at the Planck scale as a discrete Modulo-9 causal graph. We demonstrate that gravity is not a fundamental force or a continuous curvature of a manifold, but an emergent computational gradient. By modeling mass as a localized saturation of the Topological Redundancy Buffer (TRB), we show that "spacetime curvature" is physically manifested as discrete hardware lag. We present a deterministic Cellular Automaton simulation that successfully reproduces gravitational lensing and the Shapiro time delay purely through local routing algorithms. Finally, we derive the "Bridge Equation," proving that in the macroscopic continuum limit, this discrete hardware lag converges exactly to the Schwarzschild metric, Fermat's Principle, and the Parametrized Post-Newtonian (PPN) parameter = 1. We do not quantize gravity; we derive it.

Related

  1. Unfreezing Time: Unifying General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics through Conformal Emergent Geometry v1.1 Compendium
    Salman Akhtar
    ZenodoPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textZenodo
  2. Discrete Frame-by-Frame Model of Space-Time ("Grizzly Theory"): Derivation of General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics
    Мєдвєдєв Михайло
    ZenodoPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textZenodo
  3. Evidence for deviation in gravitational light deflection from general relativity at cosmological scales with KiDS-Legacy and CMB lensing
    Guohong Du, Tian-Nuo Li, T Liu +2
    Science China Physics Mechanics and AstronomyPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text6 citedCosmologyOpenAlex
  4. Classical tests of New General Relativity
    V. P. Vandeev, V. A. Parkhomenko, A. N. Semenova +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textGravitation & general relativityarXiv
  5. Quantum f-divergences from retrodictive tests: a unifying classical variational principle
    Francesco Buscemi
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textMathematical physicsQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{ramos2026gravitational,
  title = {{Gravitational Lensing and the Classical Limit: Unifying Discrete Hardware Lag with General Relativity}},
  author = {Néstor E. Ramos},
  howpublished = {Zenodo},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.5281/zenodo.23498130},
  url = {https://zenodo.org/records/23498130},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Gravitational Lensing and the Classical Limit: Unifying Discrete Hardware Lag with General Relativity
AU  - Néstor E. Ramos
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/20
PB  - Zenodo
DO  - 10.5281/zenodo.23498130
UR  - https://zenodo.org/records/23498130
AB  - For a century, the central challenge of theoretical physics has been the "quantization of gravity", the attempt to force the continuous, smooth geometry of General Relativity (GR) into a discrete quantum framework. In this paper, we invert the paradigm. Within Computational Finitism, spacetime is already quantized at the Planck scale as a discrete Modulo-9 causal graph. We demonstrate that gravity is not a fundamental force or a continuous curvature of a manifold, but an emergent computational gradient. By modeling mass as a localized saturation of the Topological Redundancy Buffer (TRB), we show that "spacetime curvature" is physically manifested as discrete hardware lag. We present a deterministic Cellular Automaton simulation that successfully reproduces gravitational lensing and the Shapiro time delay purely through local routing algorithms. Finally, we derive the "Bridge Equation," proving that in the macroscopic continuum limit, this discrete hardware lag converges exactly to the Schwarzschild metric, Fermat's Principle, and the Parametrized Post-Newtonian (PPN) parameter = 1. We do not quantize gravity; we derive it.
ER  -