Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,226 studies31 sourcesUpdated 17 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Head and Neck Pathology

MALAT1::PLAG1 Fusion in Pleomorphic Adenoma with Mucinous and Squamous Metaplasia: A Diagnostic Pitfall Mimicking Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma (ex Pleomorphic Adenoma)

7 affiliations
  1. 1Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH USA
  2. 2Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen and Faculty Hospital, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic
  3. 3Bioptic Laboratory, Ltd., Pilsen, Czech Republic
  4. 4Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON Canada
  5. 5Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON Canada
  6. 6Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON USA
  7. 7Robert J. Tomsich Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH L15 USA

Abstract

Purpose: Pleomorphic adenoma (PA), the most common salivary neoplasm, is capable of tremendous histologic diversity. Co-occurrence of squamous and mucinous differentiation in PA is a rare phenomenon generally considered within its histologic spectrum, though previously advocated by some as evidence of mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) ex PA. Herein, we describe a multi-institutional series of MEC-like PA with squamous differentiation, mucous cells, cystic change, and MALAT1::PLAG1 fusion.

Materials and Methods: Retrospective multi-institutional review identified 5 PAs with MALAT1::PLAG1 fusion. Histopathologic and immunohistochemical slides were reviewed, as well as demographic, clinical, and molecular findings.

Results: Five MALAT1::PLAG1-rearranged PA occurred in the parotid gland of 3 female and 2 male patients (median age: 53 yrs, range: 47–58 yrs). Median tumor dimension was 2.5 cm (range: 1.4–3.4 cm). All tumors demonstrated characteristic histologic features of PA as well as areas of cystic squamous and mucinous differentiation resembling MEC (comprising 25–80% of the tumors). There was no capsular invasion or high-grade features. No canonical MEC driver alterations were identified by NGS. No recurrences were identified during available follow-up in 2 patients.

Conclusion: Cystic squamous and mucinous differentiation may occur in PA, representing a potential diagnostic pitfall both in small biopsy specimens, where it can be misdiagnosed as MEC, as well as in resection specimens where it should not be interpreted as MEC ex PA. Instead, apparent association of these histologic features with MALAT1::PLAG1 fusion suggests a novel genotype–phenotype correlation in PA. Adjunct molecular testing may be valuable in diagnostically challenging cases.

Related

  1. Diagnostic Challenge in Cytology: Fibrosing Thyroiditis Mimicking Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma.
    G Anju, Meenakshi Rao, Nivedita Sharma
    Journal of cytologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-SAFull textEndocrinology & metabolismEurope PMC
  2. Complex sclerosing lesions of the breast mimicking carcinoma: diagnostic pitfalls and the decisive role of immunohistochemistry
    Shuo Zhang, Jiaxing Wang, Lei Han +1
    Annals of medicine and surgery (2012)Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Mimicking Juvenile Nasopharyngeal Angiofibroma in an Adolescent Ghanaian Male: A Diagnostic Pitfall.
    Dennis Brempong, Margaret Neizer, Samuel Romeo Hammond +1
    Clinical case reportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMCPMC
  4. Proximal Tracheal Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma Complicated by Early Anastomotic Stenosis—A Case Report
    Shivanjali Pandya, Gani Nuredini, Jahangir Ahmed +1
    Clinical case reportsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. A Case Report of Pleomorphic Adenoma of the Lower Lip: An Uncommon Location and a Diagnostic Pitfall
    Evangelos Parcharidis, Konstantinos Paraskevopoulos, Dimitrios Minotakis +2
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{lu2026malat1plag1,
  title = {{MALAT1::PLAG1 Fusion in Pleomorphic Adenoma with Mucinous and Squamous Metaplasia: A Diagnostic Pitfall Mimicking Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma (ex Pleomorphic Adenoma)}},
  author = {Liang Lu and Martina Bradová and Elan Hahn and Iona Leong and Laura J. Tafe and Darcy A. Kerr and Ivan J. Stojanov},
  journal = {Head and Neck Pathology},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1007/s12105-026-01977-1},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s12105-026-01977-1},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - MALAT1::PLAG1 Fusion in Pleomorphic Adenoma with Mucinous and Squamous Metaplasia: A Diagnostic Pitfall Mimicking Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma (ex Pleomorphic Adenoma)
AU  - Liang Lu
AU  - Martina Bradová
AU  - Elan Hahn
AU  - Iona Leong
AU  - Laura J. Tafe
AU  - Darcy A. Kerr
AU  - Ivan J. Stojanov
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/26
JO  - Head and Neck Pathology
DO  - 10.1007/s12105-026-01977-1
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1007/s12105-026-01977-1
AB  - Purpose: Pleomorphic adenoma (PA), the most common salivary neoplasm, is capable of tremendous histologic diversity. Co-occurrence of squamous and mucinous differentiation in PA is a rare phenomenon generally considered within its histologic spectrum, though previously advocated by some as evidence of mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) ex PA. Herein, we describe a multi-institutional series of MEC-like PA with squamous differentiation, mucous cells, cystic change, and MALAT1::PLAG1 fusion.  Materials and Methods: Retrospective multi-institutional review identified 5 PAs with MALAT1::PLAG1 fusion. Histopathologic and immunohistochemical slides were reviewed, as well as demographic, clinical, and molecular findings.  Results: Five MALAT1::PLAG1-rearranged PA occurred in the parotid gland of 3 female and 2 male patients (median age: 53 yrs, range: 47–58 yrs). Median tumor dimension was 2.5 cm (range: 1.4–3.4 cm). All tumors demonstrated characteristic histologic features of PA as well as areas of cystic squamous and mucinous differentiation resembling MEC (comprising 25–80% of the tumors). There was no capsular invasion or high-grade features. No canonical MEC driver alterations were identified by NGS. No recurrences were identified during available follow-up in 2 patients.  Conclusion: Cystic squamous and mucinous differentiation may occur in PA, representing a potential diagnostic pitfall both in small biopsy specimens, where it can be misdiagnosed as MEC, as well as in resection specimens where it should not be interpreted as MEC ex PA. Instead, apparent association of these histologic features with MALAT1::PLAG1 fusion suggests a novel genotype–phenotype correlation in PA. Adjunct molecular testing may be valuable in diagnostically challenging cases.
SN  - 1936-055X
SN  - 1936-0568
ER  -