Processing of Non-Bauxite Aluminum-Bearing Resources for Alumina Production: A Review
- 1Institute of Metallurgy and Ore Beneficiation, Satbayev University, Almaty 050010, Kazakhstan
- 2Department of Chemistry, College of Basic Sciences and Humanities, G.B. Pant University of Agriculture & Technology, Pantnagar 263145, UK, India
Abstract
The growing demand for alumina, regional limitations in the availability of high-quality bauxite, and the accumulation of aluminum-bearing industrial residues have increased interest in alternative raw materials. In this review, we examine natural and technogenic non-bauxite aluminum-bearing resources, including nepheline ores, kaolin and kaolinitic clays, alunite ores, coal fly ash, and bauxite residue. Their geographical occurrence, chemical composition, aluminum content, major mineral phases, and associated valuable components are summarized and compared. Particular attention is paid to the mineralogical occurrence of aluminum, which largely determines the technological value of a resource. In nepheline ores, aluminum is incorporated into a stable framework aluminosilicate structure. Kaolinite is also relatively resistant, but its transformation into metakaolin substantially increases aluminum reactivity. Alunite represents a distinct sulfate-bearing resource that may provide aluminum together with potassium- and sulfur-containing products. In coal fly ash, aluminum is distributed between reactive amorphous aluminosilicate material and refractory mullite, whereas bauxite residue contains aluminum in several residual and secondary mineral phases associated with Fe, Ti, Si, Ca, and Na. Our comparison demonstrates that the suitability of alternative resources for alumina production cannot be evaluated from the total Al2O3 content alone: mineralogy, silica reactivity, impurity composition, resource availability, and the potential recovery of co-products must also be considered. Processing routes are therefore discussed in relation to the specific characteristics of each feedstock.
Related
- Production of Secondary Microbial Methane from a Gas Hydrate-Bearing Reservoir at the HYDRATE P1 Production Test Well (PTW-1) on the Alaskan North Slope
- Combined Decarbonizing Technologies for Treatment of Bauxite Residues
- Tritium production and processing systems for ST-E1
- Optimization of Coagulation-Flocculation with Aluminum Sulfate for the Treatment of Chemical Industry Effluent
- Unraveling the charge-storage mechanism of microporous carbon cathodes in LiCl-saturated chloroaluminate ionic liquid electrolytes for aluminum-ion batteries
BibTeX
@article{akhmadiyeva2026processing,
title = {{Processing of Non-Bauxite Aluminum-Bearing Resources for Alumina Production: A Review}},
author = {Nazym Akhmadiyeva and Yerkezhan Abikak and Rinat Abdulvaliyev and Nurila Burabayeva and Abylai Smailov and Tangsholpan Sagyntayeva and Valeriy Pozmogov and Mohammad Ghulam Haider Zaidi},
journal = {Inorganics},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3390/inorganics14100265},
url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6740/14/10/265},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Processing of Non-Bauxite Aluminum-Bearing Resources for Alumina Production: A Review
AU - Nazym Akhmadiyeva
AU - Yerkezhan Abikak
AU - Rinat Abdulvaliyev
AU - Nurila Burabayeva
AU - Abylai Smailov
AU - Tangsholpan Sagyntayeva
AU - Valeriy Pozmogov
AU - Mohammad Ghulam Haider Zaidi
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/17
JO - Inorganics
DO - 10.3390/inorganics14100265
UR - https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6740/14/10/265
AB - The growing demand for alumina, regional limitations in the availability of high-quality bauxite, and the accumulation of aluminum-bearing industrial residues have increased interest in alternative raw materials. In this review, we examine natural and technogenic non-bauxite aluminum-bearing resources, including nepheline ores, kaolin and kaolinitic clays, alunite ores, coal fly ash, and bauxite residue. Their geographical occurrence, chemical composition, aluminum content, major mineral phases, and associated valuable components are summarized and compared. Particular attention is paid to the mineralogical occurrence of aluminum, which largely determines the technological value of a resource. In nepheline ores, aluminum is incorporated into a stable framework aluminosilicate structure. Kaolinite is also relatively resistant, but its transformation into metakaolin substantially increases aluminum reactivity. Alunite represents a distinct sulfate-bearing resource that may provide aluminum together with potassium- and sulfur-containing products. In coal fly ash, aluminum is distributed between reactive amorphous aluminosilicate material and refractory mullite, whereas bauxite residue contains aluminum in several residual and secondary mineral phases associated with Fe, Ti, Si, Ca, and Na. Our comparison demonstrates that the suitability of alternative resources for alumina production cannot be evaluated from the total Al2O3 content alone: mineralogy, silica reactivity, impurity composition, resource availability, and the potential recovery of co-products must also be considered. Processing routes are therefore discussed in relation to the specific characteristics of each feedstock.
SN - 2304-6740
ER -