Cancer-related loneliness management strategies: qualitative interviews of British adults
- 1School of Nursing, Allied and Public Health Professions, Canterbury Christ Church University, Canterbury, UK
Abstract
Background: Advances in early detection and treatment means people live longer with or survive cancer. However, many experience loneliness at a prevalence exceeding level of the general population. The literature shows that there are limited interventions explicitly for cancer-related loneliness and many have limited efficacy. This study sought to understand what people with cancer do themselves, that addresses their loneliness.
Methods: Qualitative interviews of adult participants with cancer (n = 18) were conducted. Participants were recruited within a region served by one English NHS trust. Participants were aged 27-80 years, 56% were female. Interviews were conducted between 2024-2025. Data were analysed using Framework Method and mapped against a novel intervention typology.
Results: Participants described themselves as making a concerted effort to be mentally and actively occupied (immersion), openly acknowledged their thoughts and feelings (reframing), spent time with others with cancer (shared experience), actively nurtured relationships (mutuality and reciprocity), sought information from varied sources (education) or sought to express themselves to make meaning (self-concept). Many participants did more than one regularly, to alleviate loneliness. Uniquely, individuals who reported that they had never been lonely used the strategies and also appeared adaptive to change. Cancer context and resource availability affected participation in available interventions.
Conclusions: Cancer-related loneliness is managed through multiple strategies. Adaptability may be protective but requires more research. The study established a foundation for tailored, multi-level approaches to reduce loneliness among adults living with cancer. The series of prominent themes and issues identified should inform future work to codesign a complex intervention.
Key messages: • People with cancer rely on individual-level strategies in contexts where sustained or structured support is limited.
• A multi-layered complex intervention that accounts for context and accessibility is essential to address cancer-related loneliness.
Related
- Cancer-related loneliness context and mechanisms: A qualitative interview study of British adults
- Cancer-related loneliness context and mechanisms: A qualitative interview study of British adults
- TVET teachers’ perceptions of ICT integration in resource-constrained teaching contexts: a qualitative thematic analysis of interviews from Hebei, China
- Experiences of nutritional management in patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema: a qualitative study guided by Fitch's supportive care framework
- “It’s not necessarily science based”: understanding organ utilisation decision-making in cardiothoracic transplantation in the UK through qualitative interviews
BibTeX
@article{brownett2026cancerrelated,
title = {{Cancer-related loneliness management strategies: qualitative interviews of British adults}},
author = {T Brownett},
journal = {The European Journal of Public Health},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1935},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1935},
note = {CC BY-NC 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Cancer-related loneliness management strategies: qualitative interviews of British adults
AU - T Brownett
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/01
JO - The European Journal of Public Health
DO - 10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1935
UR - https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1935
AB - Background: Advances in early detection and treatment means people live longer with or survive cancer. However, many experience loneliness at a prevalence exceeding level of the general population. The literature shows that there are limited interventions explicitly for cancer-related loneliness and many have limited efficacy. This study sought to understand what people with cancer do themselves, that addresses their loneliness. Methods: Qualitative interviews of adult participants with cancer (n = 18) were conducted. Participants were recruited within a region served by one English NHS trust. Participants were aged 27-80 years, 56% were female. Interviews were conducted between 2024-2025. Data were analysed using Framework Method and mapped against a novel intervention typology. Results: Participants described themselves as making a concerted effort to be mentally and actively occupied (immersion), openly acknowledged their thoughts and feelings (reframing), spent time with others with cancer (shared experience), actively nurtured relationships (mutuality and reciprocity), sought information from varied sources (education) or sought to express themselves to make meaning (self-concept). Many participants did more than one regularly, to alleviate loneliness. Uniquely, individuals who reported that they had never been lonely used the strategies and also appeared adaptive to change. Cancer context and resource availability affected participation in available interventions. Conclusions: Cancer-related loneliness is managed through multiple strategies. Adaptability may be protective but requires more research. The study established a foundation for tailored, multi-level approaches to reduce loneliness among adults living with cancer. The series of prominent themes and issues identified should inform future work to codesign a complex intervention. Key messages: • People with cancer rely on individual-level strategies in contexts where sustained or structured support is limited. • A multi-layered complex intervention that accounts for context and accessibility is essential to address cancer-related loneliness.
SN - 1101-1262
SN - 1464-360X
ER -