Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 14 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Intact-to-Amputee Transfer in Surface-EMG Gesture Decoding: Training Source and Calibration Budget

Abstract

A recogniser trained on one person rarely transfers to the next, and useful performance usually demands a fresh round of labelled calibration from the end user. A systematic review of 1077 studies quantifies where the evidence is thin: amputees appear in about one in six. Here a montage-agnostic cross-user encoder is carried to eleven transradial amputees on a protocol matched to its intact-limb training data. Zero-shot cross-population transfer fails outright: the encoder requires labeled data from the new user before it begins decoding, and it then exceeds the per-user classifier a clinic would fit by 0.190 macro F1 at three repetitions and for every subject in the cohort. Given three labelled repetitions it reaches 0.779 macro-F1 against 0.589 for the per-user pipeline. Training on forty intact subjects produces better transfers to a new amputee than training on ten other amputees, and combining the two produces better transfers than either individually. The prediction pre-registered for this study, which extends the encoder's baseline-strength account with the premise that amputee EMG is less separable, holds true only after a few repetitions become available and after enriching the source pool with additional amputees. At a single repetition, and at every budget under a source matched to the intact-limb comparison, it fails. Thus, it locates the boundary of the proposed account.

Related

  1. Toward process-level decoding of cognition with cross-domain transfer
    Soroush Mirjalili, Dobromir Rahnev, Audrey Duarte
    PsyArXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textNeuroscienceOSF
  2. PAT: Privacy-Preserving Adversarial Transfer for Accurate, Robust and Privacy-Preserving EEG Decoding
    Xiaoqing Chen, Tianwang Jia, Dongrui Wu +1
    Fundamental ResearchPeer-reviewedCC BYFull text5 citedNeuroscienceOpenAlex
  3. Mangrove taxon mapping from Sentinel-1/2 using a compact one-dimensional network with probability calibration, predictive entropy, and frozen transfer evaluation
    Guohao Liu, Shulei Wu, Yaoru Wang +5
    Frontiers in Plant SciencePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textPlant biologyCrossrefEurope PMCPMC
  4. Ten numbers from the Laplace-Beltrami spectrum facilitate training-free classification of protein structures based on surface shape
    M. Fernandez-Giro, J. Emonts, B. Berkels +1
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textBioinformatics & computational biologybioRxiv
  5. Rhythms in Decoding Do Not Signal Pulsing Information
    Freek van Ede
    The European journal of neurosciencePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textNeuroscienceEurope PMC
BibTeX
@misc{odeyemi2026intacttoamputee,
  title = {{Intact-to-Amputee Transfer in Surface-EMG Gesture Decoding: Training Source and Calibration Budget}},
  author = {Jethro Odeyemi and W. J. Zhang},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.20297},
  eprint = {2609.20297},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.20297},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Intact-to-Amputee Transfer in Surface-EMG Gesture Decoding: Training Source and Calibration Budget
AU  - Jethro Odeyemi
AU  - W. J. Zhang
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/01
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.20297
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.20297
AB  - A recogniser trained on one person rarely transfers to the next, and useful performance usually demands a fresh round of labelled calibration from the end user. A systematic review of 1077 studies quantifies where the evidence is thin: amputees appear in about one in six. Here a montage-agnostic cross-user encoder is carried to eleven transradial amputees on a protocol matched to its intact-limb training data. Zero-shot cross-population transfer fails outright: the encoder requires labeled data from the new user before it begins decoding, and it then exceeds the per-user classifier a clinic would fit by 0.190 macro F1 at three repetitions and for every subject in the cohort. Given three labelled repetitions it reaches 0.779 macro-F1 against 0.589 for the per-user pipeline. Training on forty intact subjects produces better transfers to a new amputee than training on ten other amputees, and combining the two produces better transfers than either individually. The prediction pre-registered for this study, which extends the encoder's baseline-strength account with the premise that amputee EMG is less separable, holds true only after a few repetitions become available and after enriching the source pool with additional amputees. At a single repetition, and at every budget under a source matched to the intact-limb comparison, it fails. Thus, it locates the boundary of the proposed account.
ER  -