Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 20 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NC-NDmedRxiv

Real-World Implementation and Clinical Outcomes of Mavacamten in an Underserved Urban Cohort With Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

  1. 1Morristown Medical Center

Abstract

BackgroundReal-world data regarding mavacamten use in underserved and racially diverse populations remain limited, particularly for long-term therapy implementation. Structural barriers such as financial instability, fragmented healthcare access, and challenges adhering to REMS-related monitoring requirements may affect longitudinal therapy implementation.

MethodsWe performed a retrospective observational study of consecutive patients with symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (oHCM) evaluated for mavacamten therapy at a tertiary HCM center in Bronx, NY, between 6/2022-10/2025. Patients were followed for up to 48 weeks after treatment initiation. Clinical characteristics, treatment interruptions, adverse events, echocardiographic and functional outcomes, and implementation barriers were assessed descriptively.

ResultsSeventy-two patients with symptomatic oHCM were evaluated for mavacamten; sixty-seven initiated treatment. Mean age was 66.9{+/-}15.3 years, 72% were female, and 61% identified as Black or Hispanic. Median resting left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) gradient decreased from 51mmHg (IQR30-88) at baseline to 7mmHg (IQR5-10) at 48 weeks. Median Valsalva LVOT gradient decreased from 74mmHg (IQR50-104) to 20mmHg (IQR10-29). At final follow-up, 80% of patients improved by [≥]1 NYHA functional class. LVEF declined below 50% in five patients and recovered in all cases. Approximately one-quarter experienced treatment interruption or discontinuation, nearly half related to insurance instability, non-adherence, and REMS-related monitoring barriers.

ConclusionsMavacamten demonstrated efficacy and safety outcomes comparable to those reported in clinical trials and prior registries in this predominantly underserved minority urban cohort. However, structural and healthcare-access barriers substantially affected long-term treatment implementation. These findings highlight the need to address healthcare-system barriers to ensure equitable implementation of contemporary HCM therapies.

Related

  1. Managing a mavacamten non-responder in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: A case report
    Smita Scholtz, Felix Langkamp, Volker Rudolph +2
    Journal of cardiology casesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textCardiovascular medicineEurope PMC
  2. Clinical effectiveness of mavacamten on cardiac function and disease-related indicators in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
    Ya-Nan Shi, Jia-Jia Huang, Hong-Zhi Liu +2
    Frontiers in PharmacologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textCardiovascular medicineCrossref
  3. Long-term mavacamten exposure reduces force and sarcomere density in a human induced pluripotent stem cell–derived model of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
    Marianna Langione, Lucrezia Giammarino, Roberto Semeraro +16
    Cardiovascular ResearchPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textCardiovascular medicineHAL
  4. Mavacamten shows broad benefit in human and mouse models of MYBPC3-related hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
    Laura Sen-Martín, Ángel Fernández-Trasancos, Miguel Á. López-Unzu +34
    Nature Cardiovascular ResearchPeer-reviewedPublisher termsFull textCardiovascular medicineHAL
  5. Mavacamten improves energy balance in a pre-clinical model of RASopathy-associated hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
    Andrea Ruiz-Velasco, Charlène Jouve, Lucille Deshayes +3
    Pediatric ResearchPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-SA 4.0Full text1 citedGeneral biologyCardiovascular medicineHAL
BibTeX
@misc{bock2026realworld,
  title = {{Real-World Implementation and Clinical Outcomes of Mavacamten in an Underserved Urban Cohort With Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy}},
  author = {J. Bock and S. Murthy and A. L. Schenone and A. Weissler-Snir},
  howpublished = {medRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.09.29.26364363},
  url = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.29.26364363v1},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Real-World Implementation and Clinical Outcomes of Mavacamten in an Underserved Urban Cohort With Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
AU  - J. Bock
AU  - S. Murthy
AU  - A. L. Schenone
AU  - A. Weissler-Snir
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/29
PB  - medRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.09.29.26364363
UR  - https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.29.26364363v1
AB  - BackgroundReal-world data regarding mavacamten use in underserved and racially diverse populations remain limited, particularly for long-term therapy implementation. Structural barriers such as financial instability, fragmented healthcare access, and challenges adhering to REMS-related monitoring requirements may affect longitudinal therapy implementation.  MethodsWe performed a retrospective observational study of consecutive patients with symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (oHCM) evaluated for mavacamten therapy at a tertiary HCM center in Bronx, NY, between 6/2022-10/2025. Patients were followed for up to 48 weeks after treatment initiation. Clinical characteristics, treatment interruptions, adverse events, echocardiographic and functional outcomes, and implementation barriers were assessed descriptively.  ResultsSeventy-two patients with symptomatic oHCM were evaluated for mavacamten; sixty-seven initiated treatment. Mean age was 66.9{+/-}15.3 years, 72% were female, and 61% identified as Black or Hispanic. Median resting left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) gradient decreased from 51mmHg (IQR30-88) at baseline to 7mmHg (IQR5-10) at 48 weeks. Median Valsalva LVOT gradient decreased from 74mmHg (IQR50-104) to 20mmHg (IQR10-29). At final follow-up, 80% of patients improved by [≥]1 NYHA functional class. LVEF declined below 50% in five patients and recovered in all cases. Approximately one-quarter experienced treatment interruption or discontinuation, nearly half related to insurance instability, non-adherence, and REMS-related monitoring barriers.  ConclusionsMavacamten demonstrated efficacy and safety outcomes comparable to those reported in clinical trials and prior registries in this predominantly underserved minority urban cohort. However, structural and healthcare-access barriers substantially affected long-term treatment implementation. These findings highlight the need to address healthcare-system barriers to ensure equitable implementation of contemporary HCM therapies.
ER  -