Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
182,544 studies31 sourcesUpdated 27 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Kernel-based External Validity of Experimental Studies

Abstract

The external validity of a study is the extent to which its findings generalize to unseen experimental conditions, such as datasets. We formalize the results of a study together with its research question, and define external validity as the probability that two independent and same-sized replications of the study produce results whose maximum mean discrepancy (MMD) is below a given tolerance. This approach, centered on the choice of a space of results and of an appropriate reproducing kernel for the MMD, is flexible enough to be deployed on multiple different types of results and research questions. Additionally, we establish an asymptotic power-law relation between the size of a study and the quantiles of the MMD, which we use to estimate the desired size of an externally valid study from a small-scale preliminary study. We deploy our framework to rankings with ties and discuss kernels suited to different research questions. Experiments on existing case studies and on a simulated newly designed study illustrate the applicability of the framework. We release our code as part of the genexpy Python module.

Related

  1. Designing multi‐site studies for external validity: Site selection via synthetic purposive sampling
    Naoki Egami, Diana Da In Lee
    American Journal of Political SciencePeer-reviewedCC BYFull text8 citedStatisticsOpenAlex
  2. What Pilot Studies Can (and Cannot) Do for Validity in Psychological Research
    Yashvin Seetahul, Mahmoud Elsherif, Caroline Zygar-Hoffmann +7
    PsyArXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsOSF
  3. Addressing threats to validity in large dataset research
    Wonsuk Yoo, John P A Ioannidis
    PLOS MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textStatisticsPLOSEurope PMCEurope PMC
  4. Long-time validity of the Korteweg-de Vries approximation for the Boussinesq equation
    Younghun Hong, Junyeong Jang
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAnalysis & PDEsarXiv
  5. A counterexample to the pointwise validity of an asymptotic mean value property for p-harmonic functions
    Ángel Arroyo, Jeff Calder, Mikko Parviainen
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAnalysis & PDEsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{matteucci2026kernelbased,
  title = {{Kernel-based External Validity of Experimental Studies}},
  author = {Federico Matteucci and Gerhard Neumann},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.13625},
  eprint = {2610.13625},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.13625},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Kernel-based External Validity of Experimental Studies
AU  - Federico Matteucci
AU  - Gerhard Neumann
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/09
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.13625
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.13625
AB  - The external validity of a study is the extent to which its findings generalize to unseen experimental conditions, such as datasets. We formalize the results of a study together with its research question, and define external validity as the probability that two independent and same-sized replications of the study produce results whose maximum mean discrepancy (MMD) is below a given tolerance. This approach, centered on the choice of a space of results and of an appropriate reproducing kernel for the MMD, is flexible enough to be deployed on multiple different types of results and research questions. Additionally, we establish an asymptotic power-law relation between the size of a study and the quantiles of the MMD, which we use to estimate the desired size of an externally valid study from a small-scale preliminary study. We deploy our framework to rankings with ties and discuss kernels suited to different research questions. Experiments on existing case studies and on a simulated newly designed study illustrate the applicability of the framework. We release our code as part of the genexpy Python module.
ER  -