Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 1 h ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYAnnals of medicine

Performance of the Phoenix Sepsis Score for in-hospital mortality in critically ill pediatric oncology patients with suspected infection.

  1. 1Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.

Abstract

Background

Pediatric oncology patients with infection face a high risk of death. Although the Phoenix Sepsis Score (PSS) has recently been introduced as an organ dysfunction score for pediatric sepsis, its performance in pediatric oncology populations remains insufficiently characterized.Methods

This retrospective study enrolled pediatric oncology patients admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) with suspected infection. The performance of the PSS was evaluated and compared with other pediatric critical care scores for discrimination of in-hospital mortality.Results

The study cohort comprised 224 patients, accounting for 254 PICU admissions. The overall hospital mortality rate was 17.7%. All scoring systems except the Pediatric Risk of Mortality III (PRISM III) score demonstrated good discrimination. Phoenix-8 showed the highest area under the curve (AUC) (0.855, 95% CI: 0.791-0.919), followed by PSS (0.837) and Pediatric Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (pSOFA) score (0.836). Phoenix-8 had significantly higher AUCs than PHO-Phoenix and PRISM III; differences among the other scoring systems were not statistically significant. Sensitivity analyses were broadly consistent with the primary analysis but showed lower AUCs after inclusion of deaths following discontinuation of life-sustaining therapy.Conclusions

The PSS showed good discrimination for in-hospital mortality in PICU-admitted pediatric oncology patients with infection, with an AUC of similar magnitude to those of pSOFA and PELOD-2. Its lower data requirements may support its use as a clinically feasible tool for mortality risk assessment in this high-risk population.

Related

  1. LDAR shows more consistent prognostic performance than other albumin-derived indices for 28-day ICU mortality in critically ill patients with urosepsis: evidence from a dual-cohort retrospective study
    Yi Mu, Hao Tang, Yan Zeng +5
    Frontiers in medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Diagnostic performance of the dengue Ag NS1 rapid test in Peruvian adults with suspected dengue virus infection
    Lesly Rivera-Yancce, Jhanet Prado-Cárdenas, Jeel Moya-Salazar +3
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthCrossref
  3. Factors associated with mortality among critically ill pediatric patients referred to a tertiary hospital in Indonesia
    Desy Rusmawatiningtyas, Indah Kartika Murni, Dwi Astuti Dharma Putri +3
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral biologyObstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsPLOSPMC
  4. Molecular Etiology and Mortality Risk Stratification of Non-SARS-CoV-2 Severe Acute Respiratory Infection in a Predominantly Pediatric Cohort: A Retrospective Study From a Tertiary Care Hospital in North India
    Praroop Garg, Vikramjeet Dutta, Mohit Bhatia +6
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Prehospital qSOFA Is Associated with 30-Day Mortality Within Emergency Department Triage Strata in Ambulance-Transported Adults with Suspected Infection: An Exploratory Three-Year Retrospective Cohort Study
    Ayşenur Özçelik, Faruk Danış, Kaan Çelik
    Journal of clinical medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMCCrossref
BibTeX
@article{xing2026performance,
  title = {{Performance of the Phoenix Sepsis Score for in-hospital mortality in critically ill pediatric oncology patients with suspected infection.}},
  author = {Dianwei Xing and Zijing Xiao and Baiming Liu and Jingjing Xu and Yufeng Liang},
  journal = {Annals of medicine},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1080/07853890.2026.2743326},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42851065},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Performance of the Phoenix Sepsis Score for in-hospital mortality in critically ill pediatric oncology patients with suspected infection.
AU  - Dianwei Xing
AU  - Zijing Xiao
AU  - Baiming Liu
AU  - Jingjing Xu
AU  - Yufeng Liang
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/09
JO  - Annals of medicine
DO  - 10.1080/07853890.2026.2743326
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42851065
AB  - Background  Pediatric oncology patients with infection face a high risk of death. Although the Phoenix Sepsis Score (PSS) has recently been introduced as an organ dysfunction score for pediatric sepsis, its performance in pediatric oncology populations remains insufficiently characterized.Methods  This retrospective study enrolled pediatric oncology patients admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) with suspected infection. The performance of the PSS was evaluated and compared with other pediatric critical care scores for discrimination of in-hospital mortality.Results  The study cohort comprised 224 patients, accounting for 254 PICU admissions. The overall hospital mortality rate was 17.7%. All scoring systems except the Pediatric Risk of Mortality III (PRISM III) score demonstrated good discrimination. Phoenix-8 showed the highest area under the curve (AUC) (0.855, 95% CI: 0.791-0.919), followed by PSS (0.837) and Pediatric Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (pSOFA) score (0.836). Phoenix-8 had significantly higher AUCs than PHO-Phoenix and PRISM III; differences among the other scoring systems were not statistically significant. Sensitivity analyses were broadly consistent with the primary analysis but showed lower AUCs after inclusion of deaths following discontinuation of life-sustaining therapy.Conclusions  The PSS showed good discrimination for in-hospital mortality in PICU-admitted pediatric oncology patients with infection, with an AUC of similar magnitude to those of pSOFA and PELOD-2. Its lower data requirements may support its use as a clinically feasible tool for mortality risk assessment in this high-risk population.
SN  - 0785-3890
SN  - 1365-2060
ER  -