Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 32 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NC-SA 4.0arXiv

Sequential resetting procedures and false discovery rate

Abstract

Data arrive sequentially, each associated with a null hypothesis. We develop testing procedures to locate intervals in which some null hypotheses fail, with false discovery rate (FDR) control. The new procedures are called sequential resetting procedures, and they are based on e-values and test supermartingales. We also develop a refined version of the procedures by dropping less informative data points before the block minimum of the test supermartingale in each rejection block. These procedures have explicit FDR bounds under two settings: a classic setting of independence and the more general setting of possible dependence across null data and non-null data. These FDR bounds are independent of the testing horizon, and the general one has anytime validity, but it has an extra logarithm factor compared with the standard FDR level. We present simulation studies and data experiments with applications of sequential resetting procedures to LLM watermark detection and financial backtesting.

Related

  1. False discovery rate control for sparse correlation matrix.
    Arief Gusnanto, Basuki Widodo, Norli Anida Abdullah +2
    Bioinformatics advancesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textStatisticsEurope PMC
  2. Controlling the False Discovery Rate via Model-Agnostic Importance Measures
    Mengtao Wen, Haojie Ren, Changliang Zou
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  3. Admissibility and Complete Classes for False Discovery Rate Control with E-values
    Liulei Sun, Ruodu Wang
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  4. Empirical Bayes prepivoting under group invariance: false discovery rate control and moderated t-tests
    Nikolaos Ignatiadis, Etienne Roquain
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  5. Multiple Testing Of Composite Null Hypotheses With High Dimensional Count Data: A Local False Discovery Rate Approach
    Emmanuel Asare, Pratyaydipta Rudra, Joshua Habiger
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{wang2026sequential,
  title = {{Sequential resetting procedures and false discovery rate}},
  author = {Qiuqi Wang and Ruodu Wang and Zhenyuan Zhang},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.09339},
  eprint = {2610.09339},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.09339},
  note = {CC BY-NC-SA 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Sequential resetting procedures and false discovery rate
AU  - Qiuqi Wang
AU  - Ruodu Wang
AU  - Zhenyuan Zhang
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/13
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.09339
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.09339
AB  - Data arrive sequentially, each associated with a null hypothesis. We develop testing procedures to locate intervals in which some null hypotheses fail, with false discovery rate (FDR) control. The new procedures are called sequential resetting procedures, and they are based on e-values and test supermartingales. We also develop a refined version of the procedures by dropping less informative data points before the block minimum of the test supermartingale in each rejection block. These procedures have explicit FDR bounds under two settings: a classic setting of independence and the more general setting of possible dependence across null data and non-null data. These FDR bounds are independent of the testing horizon, and the general one has anytime validity, but it has an extra logarithm factor compared with the standard FDR level. We present simulation studies and data experiments with applications of sequential resetting procedures to LLM watermark detection and financial backtesting.
ER  -